Decoding Hospital Pricing: A Call for Standardization

Hospital Pricing

Before we dive into the recent directives from the Supreme Court, let's unpack the intricacies of hospital pricing. Hospitals maintain a Schedule of Charges (SOC), which is essentially a price list for various services. This SOC serves as a vital tool for patients and their families to comprehend the financial aspects of their medical care journey. Furthermore, hospitals cater to a diverse range of patients, including those who pay directly in cash and those covered under insurance or government schemes like CGHS and ECHS.

Diverse Patient base

Hospitals cater to various payors, including cash payers who settle bills directly at counter, and credit patients covered under insurance, government schemes like CGHS, ECHS, or other state-run programs.

To grasp the financial landscape of hospitals, it's essential to understand their revenue composition. Hospitals derive approx.40% of their income from cash-paying patients, 20% from those covered under insurance (Including GIPSA), and another 40% from government schemes like CGHS and allied programs. However, this revenue breakdown poses its own set of challenges, given the complexities involved in billing for various services.

While cash payers (40% of biz.) are subject to internally set SOC prices, however insurance companies (20% of biz. including GIPSA) negotiate rates with hospitals on the internally set prices, discount varies 10% to 25% different for each hospital.

GIPSA (General Insurance Practices Service Agreement), it comprises public sector insurance companies, mandates pricing agreements with hospitals seeking empanelment. GIPSA covers more than 100 procedures whose prices are regulated by this body.

Government Schemes: CGHS and similar schemes (40% of biz.) regulate hospital pricing, often resulting in significantly lower rates compared to standard charges. Ayushman Bharat (AB) further lowers prices, posing challenges for hospitals.

The Supreme Court's Call to Action

The recent directives from the Supreme Court have thrust the issue of standardizing hospital pricing into the spotlight. The court's insistence on fairness and uniformity in pricing could potentially extend government-regulated prices to all patients, including cash payers.

Why Hospitals Are Concerned

Hospitals are understandably apprehensive about this proposed change. Their business model heavily relies on revenue from cash and insurance payers, who often provide higher prices compared to government schemes and bears the more burden than other payors. The fear of potential financial losses looms large, threatening the viability of their operations.

A Balanced Approach to Pricing Standardization

While the goal of standardizing hospital pricing is good for the industry as well as for the public, but at the same time it's imperative to adopt a balanced and sub-flexible approach that takes into account the needs of all stakeholders. Organizations like NABH could potentially play a pivotal role in ensuring adherence to standards and fairness in pricing.

While it's crucial to standardize pricing across the payors, it's equally important to do so with a clear rationale. This begs the question: what factors should guide this rationale?

To establish a fair and comprehensive pricing policy, we need to consider a range of variables. These include the size of hospital infrastructure, accreditations obtained, utilization of medical technology, the array of specialties offered, the depth of expertise within each specialty, and participation in government schemes at both central and state levels.

By carefully evaluating these variables, we can develop a pricing framework that accurately reflects the value of healthcare services provided. This approach ensures that pricing is not only standardized but also equitable, taking into account the diverse capabilities and resources of each healthcare institution.

Recognizing the multifaceted challenges within the healthcare sector, there is a compelling need for the creation of a specialized regulatory body. This entity would serve as a platform for listening to the concerns, problems, and requirements of healthcare providers, patients, and other stakeholders, including pricing standardization.

?

Conclusion

The journey towards fair and transparent hospital pricing is truly significant. It's not just about setting standard prices; it's about building trust and fairness in our hospital system. Imagine a world where everyone, regardless of their payor status, can access quality healthcare. That's the kind of equality we're striving for.

For hospitals to achieve this, they need to adopt clear pricing policies that apply to everyone. These policies should spell out how prices are set and when they're reviewed. Plus, on the Government part there should be efficient systems in place for handling payments promptly and transparently.

Fair pricing isn't just about numbers—it's about ensuring that healthcare is accessible to all. By implementing standardized pricing policies and transparent payment processes, hospitals can take a big step towards making this vision a reality for everyone.