Decoding Farm Sector - How Much Agitation Is Justified
DHARM RAKSHIT
Creating a meaningful & Engaging workplace at Hero MotoCorp Ltd. Sr HR Leader ||Change leader || Executive Coach|| Mentor II Influencer
Since formative stage of my life I have experienced & am informed that India’s economy is largely dependent on Agriculture and interestingly till today about 77% of rural households depend upon agriculture(the Hindu Business line) for their livelihood and 52% of Indian population is engaged in Agricultural activities, whereas the contribution of Agriculture has declined from 34% in 1983-84 to 16% in 2018-19 at the same time the agricultural sectors contribution to employment has declined from 81% in 1983 to 58% in 2018.
Despite being heavily dependent on agricultural income and involvement of a large population in agriculture & allied agricultural activities, India could not become a lead agro commodities producing nation of the world, having a meagre $3.5 billion of agricultural exports in 2020(IBEF). Till now Indian agricultural largely remains in news for bad reasons like farmers suicide, poor income etc., although our honourable Prime Minister started Kisan Channel on DD Network, still the overall awareness of urban population about agriculture remains very low. Each and every election since 1990 echoed the populist demand for farm loan waivers etc. without considering the harm it caused to overall economy as well as whole agricultural ecosystem of India.
If we take a deep dive to the Indian farming & farm sector structure I find following about these,
Farming structure
- Insignificant intervention and adoption of scientific ways of farming
- Monsoon oriented farming resulting in uncertain & poor yields and impact of El Nino and La Nina
- Poor Logistic to farming products and farm to fork management
- Wastage of perishable farm yields due to lack of cold chain
Farmers Structure
- Big Farmers – owns & cultivates more than 2 hectare lands
- Small Framers – Cultivates between 1-2 hectare of lands
- Marginal Farmers – either works share croppers or owns & cultivates less than 1 hectare land
- Farm labours – Who doesn’t own land but work as labourer in the farm land against money & farm yields
Since independence various interventions had been attempted by successive governments to improve to the plight of farmers & better yields. During the short tenure of Prime Minister Late Lalbahadur Shastri, India first time acclaimed pride by becoming a self-reliant country in yielding core crops. During 1966 , India started witnessing upsurge in agriculture yields as Green revolution stared spreading its foot prints under famous scientist MS Swaminathan but by the 1990s it lost its steam as no further interventions were made to make farmers self-reliant & farming a rewarding profession.
From 1990s, the successive governments, instead of resolving the core issues of farming, paid much attention on populist measures like Loan waivers schemes, subsidy etc., which also did adversely impacted the health of Nationalised banks. While the governments, both Central & State took these populist measures to improve the plights of farmers, the suicide rate of farmers kept increasing. Between 1997 to 2005, the farmer’s suicide rate was 4.55% per 10 lac population whereas due to another reasons the suicide rate 10.6% for rest of the population. (The Journal of Development Studies by Gruère, G. & Sengupta, D)
During the period from 1995 to 2005 the farmers committed suicide in a large no & following data reflects the same (Source NCRB India)
Interestingly the Green Revolution covered largely 3 states Punjab, Haryana & Western UP & in these states the Farmers suicide were the lowest, however states like Maharashtra, Karnataka, Andhra & MP top the tally .
From the beginning of 1990’s a new trend of waiving farmer’s loan started by the Socialist governments. It was a hybrid schemes sometimes announced by centre & sometimes announced by State Govt’s.
In 2008 a package of 52,000 Cr. was introduced as Farm loan waiver by Govt. of India, however it could not improve the plight of farmers as we see the suicide rate in 3 successive year & it remained almost same
The above data is evident that these farm loan waivers schemes could not improve the plight of farmers. Now the valid question arises why these Farm loan waiver schemes could not work?
Farm loans are taken largely by the big & small farmers, who deploy either marginal farmers or land labours on their field. So basically they are money holding persons who invest their money in the farms & work on the Industry module. Get the Capital in terms loans & in the event of any adversities they claim the Loan waivers. However the Marginal Farmers normally take loans from the private money lenders & there is no formal mechanism to capture this loan & none of the waivers schemes in fact helped those farmers & larger population who commit suicide come from this pool only. More over wealthy farmers (large & small) finds a way out to make additional money through the leakages in the process. A report of Tribune, mentions that Punjab Farmers are depositing their income to other banks to avoid payment of their loans & thus defaults. The Condition of farm labourers so far not much got attention. The labourers from Bihar , UP , Odisha migrates to the researcher state likes Punjab, Haryana , Western UP & work as labourers , where they work on meagre income from Rs.160 to 350 per day. Demystifying MSP
The idea for Minimum Support Price (MSP) is to give guaranteed price & assured market to farmers. The MSP is given Food Grains, Oil Seeds, Cotton, Sugarcane, Jute & Tobacco . Pls be noted that the MSP is not given on Vegetable Products.
The Zone wise Production of MSP supported agricultural product
Interesting to note that states which are topping in MSP supported agricultural products are not sharing the lion share of MSP. A data of 2017-18 shows following
Inference
1. The agricultural policy inherited from Britishers & vigorously pursued over the period of time has not helped either farmers or Farm yield
2. There is a huge difference in MSP beneficiary states & MSP supported farm product producers states
3. In the MSP only few farm products are included causing much distress to other farmers viz Vegetable producers etc
Way Forward
In order to improve the situation & revolutionised farm sector we need to have some radical thinking. The New Farm Laws which has now been brought is very much radical in approach. The effectiveness of this can only be judged how it’s going to be implemented. Unfortunately without going in to merits of this Bills & finding the ways & means to make it more effective, a section of people trying to paint it bad & favored the old regime.
Some points to ponder
1. Old regime of Agri Sector - It is evident that past policies & measures have neither helped the farmers nor improved the farming yields as currently India’s farm yields are nowhere matching with global benchmarks ( Rice Yield in India is 2191kg/hectare against global benchmark of 3026 & similarly wheat yield is 2750 kg/hectare whereas global yields are 3289 kg/hectare)
2. Privatization vs Protection - The arguments against privatization in farming does not hold valid in current state of affairs. Normally the political parties try to paint a bad pictures about privatization, but matter of fact is that currently the share of employment in the country of private sector is~ 60% & contribution in GDP is ~33%. Private organizations work more efficiently & innovatively in reducing cost & optimizing profit. Linkages of farming sector with private sector is going to do the revolutionary changes in the sector
3. Farm Subsidy – Either MSP or waiver schemes have not made any significant improvement. Neither this has checked suicide of farmers nor it has improved the overall condition of farmers.
Recommendations
1. Introduce a strong regulatory mechanism to prevent the exploitations of farmers & end users. A Central & state Tribunal may be put into force
2. Emphasis on improving the income of farmer & instead doling out subsidy to make farmers self-reliant
3. Regulation of prices from Farm to Fork
4. Improving logistic for an efficient supply of farm produce to end consumers thus reducing wastage & spillage
5. Large scale introduction of scientific ways of farming including skill development of farmers for better adoption of Agri. Practices in line with the new normal of Climate Change
Adj Faculty IITB & IIST
1 年@dharm Rakshit @Jayant, looks like You have tried to understood things from the roots which may give a path, seeking to resolve problems faced by traditional Method Agri and throwing light on basic principles and foundation. Objective being to make Agriculturist Self Sustainable and not burdening the Funding agencies like Nationalised Banks, Govt Schemes etc
Senior Director-Supply Chain Management,DKSH Malaysia Leadership and People Management | Business Strategy and Planning | Logistics and Distribution | Program Management
3 年Well written !! I think the major issue is redeployment of current farmers before introduction of corporate farming..a major chunk of them don’t have enough skills to do an alternate job and there is unemployment amongst casual labour’s due to stagnation of Real estate/Retail.I think the bill could have thought through this angle,there should be a support to current farmers through MNREGA or other guaranteed employment scheme or an incentive increase their productivity for a set number of years.The money saved from elimination of MSP can be reinvested into this for a set period...this would ensure that next generation of current farmers look at alternate sectors for employment.Discussion and consensus should be the way forward.
Lead-Corporate Security & Admin , Compliance @ HeroMotoCorp ,India ????
3 年A deep dive research over the current issue ?? ?? ??
Strategic HR Consulting || CHRO || Accredited Mediator– S.I.M.I. (Singapore), I.M.I.(Netherlands), ADR ODR Intl (UK), IIAM || Numerologist || A Seeker
3 年My 2 cents on the current stalemate & subject of ur data packed nicely articulated writeup : Punjab; largely an agri state kept on loosing its edge since 80s as continued producing same crops wheat/ rice (fulfilling 65% of national consumption) and grain Supplies went substantially beyond consumption & even storage capacities leading to lower price and thousands of tons of grains getting rotten in govt storages procured on MSP. All this because successive govt’s.of Punjab, centre failed to bring robust agri policy, support & infra introducing other profitable crops, Pulses etc. and we’ve to import pulses today. Other agri state farmers r at better pitch than Punjab today but they also didn’t see those prosperous times as Punjab did 4 decades ago. Another issue that refrained our farmers getting their due is that any major increase in msp drives prices of essential food commodities leading to increase min wage which affects industry directly and the growth....a vicious cycle. Shameful for us as a society that we cudnt bring timely reforms to ensure that our farmers get their due & live respectfully. Kisan & poor have become synonyms today.
Retired as Director- HR from Bisleri International Pvt Ltd.
3 年Dharam sir, very exhaustive note on farm sector with data. This type of analysis is needed to guide the agitating farmers of Punjab & Harayana who are most beneficiaries of MSP and growing non usable wheat which is again procured by Govt through FCI where it rots and go back to Punjab distilleries at throw away price. They buy good rice from MP for their consumption. Again to get MSP from Govt they grow huge paddy whereas they hardly consume rice. Here they are not only using huge amount water available in the area besides deflating ground water for paddy just to get MSP. By continuous cultivating of paddy the land is turning to infertility. Also by burning huge amount of paddy husk, they are creating huge pollution issue in north india. With introduction of new farm law, only farmers of these 2 States only agitating when rest of indian farmers are silent as they are aware of the benefits of new law. The entire issue is not farmers but of politicians, mandi owners and middlemen.