On decision making
Hmm..

On decision making

Elevating Your Leadership Game

In any organization, whether you're a permanent leader or stepping in temporarily, one of the fundamental responsibilities is making decisions. This might seem straightforward, but decision-making is far from a single-dimensional task. It's not just about saying yes or no.

For many leaders, the ability to quickly provide an answer is seen as a hallmark of great leadership. It eliminates bottlenecks and allows the organization to move forward swiftly. While this can be true in some cases, if decisions were always that simple, they could be handled further down the chain with the right guidance and delegation.

To truly optimize for the best outcomes, decisions need to be categorized. When younger managers come to me with an "urgent" request for a decision, I often ask:

  • Why can't you make this decision yourself?
  • When do we really need to decide?
  • How many options do we have?
  • Is this a no-regret decision with long-term consequences?

Sometimes, the hesitation to decide stems from uncertainty about their mandate, which can be clarified to empower them for the future. Other times, what feels urgent is simply the desire to clear the table and move on. Even in the most pressing situations, I've found there's always time to take five minutes to think things through, avoiding reflexive responses.

Is it a binary choice, or have we considered multiple options? Introducing simple, standard ways to describe options ensures we've reflected on all possibilities, including doing nothing. This helps the leadership team develop a common language and approach.

Lastly, consider if the decision will have significant long-lasting consequences, which might require a different approach altogether.

As you move up the leadership ladder, your perspective changes, and so does the need for different decision-making styles. In February 2006, the Harvard Business Review published an article titled "The Seasoned Executive's Decision-Making Style," which included a simple 2x2 matrix. The authors found that senior executives who performed best used integrative and flexible methods more frequently, aligning with the increasing complexity of decisions at higher leadership levels.


Adapted from Brousseau et al., Harvard Business Review (2006)

?

Reflecting on your decision-making styles and applying different approaches in various situations is key to optimizing context-driven decision-making.

What has been your experience with different decision-making styles?

Peter CG Andersen

Executive Advisor | Partner @ HR navigator | Executive Search & Recruitment | C-level, IT, Sales... | VL109

4 周

Great summary, I’m insight, Rasmus Blom. These are very good questions: “? Why can't you make this decision yourself? ? When do we really need to decide?”

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Rasmus Blom的更多文章

  • The Principle of Principles.

    The Principle of Principles.

    In almost all the companies and organizations (including the army) I have worked with in my life, I have been met with…

    1 条评论
  • Internet of Things - there's no turning back, now it's about how.

    Internet of Things - there's no turning back, now it's about how.

    This is a translated article from the Danish business newspaper B?rsen, published on 16th of November 2016, under the…

    1 条评论
  • Radical Transformation..? No, thanks.

    Radical Transformation..? No, thanks.

    Isn’t the truth that, besides butterflies, very few of us really enjoy going through radical organisational…

  • The 3 value categories of IoT and the Connected Industry

    The 3 value categories of IoT and the Connected Industry

    There really is no point talking about IoT or Connected Industry if it wasn’t because they was some value to be…

    4 条评论
  • Unlock, understand and unleash the value.

    Unlock, understand and unleash the value.

    Taking use of new connectivity technologies and digitization in what is mainly described as Internet of Things or IoT…

    4 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了