Debate: when if ever should we gate our content behind a form?
Jon Miller
MarTech entrepreneur, cofounder at Marketo and Engagio, board member, keynote speaker
Here's my point of view on this ongoing debate.
??? ARGUMENTS TO UNGATE
Opponents of gating argue it's in conflict with a buyer-centric approach. The sentiment is fair; nobody enjoys form-filling. An ungated approach definitely makes for a smoother user experience, which can, in turn, boost brand perception. Assuming you want your content to get seen by as many people as possible, ungating will help it get seen and shared. You may not even get accurate data with a form, and in a landscape where GDPR and CCPA reign, concerns around data privacy are real.
?? ADVANTAGES OF GATING
You got the person to your site and got them to engage. Great! But if they remain anonymous, you can't nurture the relationship over time. It’s valuable to have opt-in permission to invite the person to events and other ways to engage. And if the content indicates the company may actually be in-market to make it purchase, without a form it’s harder to know who to contact. Ungated content also makes it harder to measure the ROI of your efforts to attract buyers to the site. Lastly, there should be a fair value exchange with the customer: if you give them something valuable, shouldn’t they be willing to give you something valuable?
?? A BALANCED APPROACH
Rather than having religion around a “No Forms” policy, I think the most pragmatic strategy is a hybrid model, combining both gated and ungated assets based on the buying stage and value of the content.
(A quick note about requiring work vs personal emails: I think we need a balanced, hybrid approach here as well. There are times a valid recipient can’t use a work email, e.g. they’re on leave or are perhaps switching jobs. I wouldn’t require a work email for early stage content, but perhaps work email is required for valuable content that indicates an active buying cycle such as a buyer’s guide or analyst report.)
??? LEVERAGING TECH FOR SMARTING GATING
Fortunately, technology can help a lot here. For example:
领英推荐
Account Identification ??
Even if a visitor remains anonymous, ABM platforms can identify their associated company. Knowing which companies are engaging with your content provides invaluable account intelligence and prioritize marketing and sales efforts toward organizations that are likely in-market for your solutions.
Retargeting Ads ??
Retargeting ads can reengage visitors, funneling them back into your site or a landing page, where perhaps they’ll to opt-in.
Intelligent Forms ??
There's no need to ask things like the person's company size if you know their company and can look that up. The most extreme version of this is to just ask for the email address; from that, you get opt-in and can look up their name, title, even mobile phone. This is not only better for the buyer but can also give more accurate and standardized information.
Skip the Form with Automation ??
For visitors already "cookied" into your marketing automation systems like Marketo, there's absolutely no need for another form. Bypass it completely; these systems can still track content consumption as if the visitor filled out a form, giving you insights into user behavior without causing friction for the visitor.
In summary, don't look at gated content as a binary decision. It's about balancing accessibility with the capacity to engage and nurture prospects. By doing so, you're not leaving your pipeline to chance, but building it on strategic choices and measurable actions.
Let me know if you agree or disagree in the comments, and how you handle this!
Empowering brands to reach their full potential
1 个月Jon, thanks for sharing! How are you?
Founder of Jewel Content Marketing Agency | Truths & Memes | Content Strategy, Thought Leadership, Copywriting, Social Media 'n' Stuff for B2B & Tech
1 年Whether to gate depends on the goal of the content. If you want a broad audience, don't get. If you really want leads now, gate. But don't gate willy-nilly, even if you want leads. Gate in instances where the likelihood of the reader is high that they're currently looking to buy, or gate in instances where you have an extremely niche audience where the awareness penalty for gating is low. Something I wrote on this: https://jewelcontent.com/blog23.html
This topic has been discussed for a long time now, inside marketing teams, conferences and bar conversations, and the obvious answer has always been “a hybrid approach”. First of all, no form download should be considered a MQL, maybe a lead in the best case scenario. But the main issue I see here is WHY companies decide to gate or don’t gate content. And in most cases, the reason is “to track ROI” so they can run lead generation reports and look good to the executive teams. Very few organizations really take the time to understand why, when and how to use forms for their content. Most don’t have the tools, staff or knowledge to implement a holistic plan that can incorporate a “hybrid approach”. IMHO forms are obsolete and we have better ways to capture intent and engage with our buyers (ABM, Social selling, AI-powered landing pages, etc).
Chief Revenue Officer | SVP Growth & Commercial Director | Expert in Sales Strategies, ABM & Gen AI | Growth Consultancy & SaaS | MEDDICC | Mentor
1 年Don’t gate. Not ever on your own digital estate. Focus efforts instead on making it findable. A gate is a barrier between you and your audience. On third party platforms, it’s a good way to capture direct access to send them more relevant/valuable content that helps their buyer journey.
CEO, oneninefive | Demand Generation Specialists for Global B2B Brands | Start-Up Investor & NED
1 年We always advice our clients a simple mantra ‘if you can Google it, don’t gate it’ If the subject matter you are planning to put behind a gate is easily searchable, the value exchange for a prospects details simply it’s not there. If however it can’t be Googled (has unique slant, is a customised for the prospect or original research) then raise the drawbridge!?