The death of the larger HMS provider?
Dave Loudon
Thought leader, consultant and advocate of how social housing can benefit from technology. Founder of the insight shacks and also a board member for Muirhouse and Non-Exec for Smplicare. Columnist for Housing Executive
Some weeks ago, I arranged a very popular session we called Question Time with a panel who discussed the topic: ‘Is the recent acquisition of Capita from MRI and other acquisitions a good thing for the sector’.
It was a great event and can still be seen on our YouTube channel here: https://youtu.be/gD_FGSA5Thw
We held this event as I was asked on a number of occasions what I thought about the spate of acquisitions and what it means for the sector.
As folks will know I have been working with housing management systems suppliers, procuring, implementing and analysing for some years and get asked by many landlords and indeed other suppliers what the state of the nation is on a regular basis.
Well, from recent activities and news, I don’t think the state of the nation is all that healthy when it comes to many of the traditional suppliers.
Awkward reviews and customer feedback, needless acquisitions, further competition from other, newer suppliers, and changing needs all mean there is some very serious questions that should be asked of the suppliers. Let’s take some case by case:
Capita/MRI
I don’t think the acquisition of Capita from MRI is all that good for the sector at all. It’s one step too far for the American company. Scale does not necessarily translate and bigger is not better, no matter what anyone says. Capita were seriously struggling on a number of fronts before the acquisition and the buyout means that a company who has aggressively sought and bought many other solutions providers have just added another layer to the complexity and confusion as to their offerings for a sector that needs simplicity. We are now seeing the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) is investigating the completed acquisition by MRI Software LLC of Capita One Limited. So, a stage too far and a terrible decision? We’ll sound find out.
See the investigation and enforcement order here: https://www.gov.uk/cma-cases/mri-software-slash-capita-one-merger-inquiry
?
Civica
I have over the past few days had two calls from landlords asking what I think about Civica’s current position. The initial discussions I’ve had are not looking good, with business change that seems evidence of a poor run of implementations and incredible consultancy costs. If you also pay attention, you will have seen a number of redundancies in recent months, another sign of a struggling business perhaps. Make of it what you will, but when has redundancy been a sign of anything good. Are Civica struggling? Are the new owners getting nervous, it looks like it.
There is also a human side to this, and I know of many excellent folks in Civica that, just before Christmas are looking for jobs.
Aareon
Another company who were a mainstay in the housing sector have had some serious issues of recent years and I am not convinced their recent buy-out from TPG (Who?) for 3.9 billion, that’s right, 3.9 BILLION for a struggling company in a crowded market, well, guess someone thought that was worth it.
So, another acquisition and one that will no doubt bring a pretty pay packet to some individuals, but what about the customers, are they seeing any value? I just don’t know, perhaps worth digging further.
?
SDM
SDM, perhaps not as well-known as the above companies, yet one with a decent number of customers were recently bought out by the Volaris Group, a massive acquirer of software businesses across the globe. How this is affecting SDM provision of software in the social housing sector I don’t know yet. What I do know IS that when you add it to the mix again we have to ask is there simply too many acquisitions in the sector and is it a good thing, is it damaging trust in said providers actually caring about the sector or is it just about the next buck?
Then there is NEC
NEC just seem to be getting on with things. You may recall they were once Northgate, and one acquisition that was managed well.?
So, it can work, but I wonder if that is the exception,
?
Designer Software, MIS-AMS and Rubixx
These three companies seem to be the steady ships of the sector and have not been enticed by big money buy outs that from my opinion seems to be purely about money. Will this remain the case, who knows, but for now these companies must be sitting back and wondering if the amount of acquisitions above can only be a good thing,
So, back to one of the first points. Are there acquisitions a good thing for the sector, will they all work out, is it fundamentally changing the way landlords will seek solutions?
I also think the overall approach is changing and we are seeing a change in systems architecture, with the large, all encompassing system not the only option for landlords. Best of breed, specialist software providers are offering in some cases far better solutions at more affordable costs. Integration solutions are advancing also. My point then to finish up is that there are options, you can if you are unhappy with a supplier question their motives, question if they are right for you as a customer. Carry out some due diligence and ask others what they think. Don't just assume the acquisition is right for you.
Workforce, Job Management and Compliance Software Vendor
1 周A good debate Dave, a separate but recurring commentary born out by our own enquiries is that SH Organisations are coming to Propeller after they have procured systems because the large HMS vendors are simply not able to deliver against all the operationally essential requirements of the Client. In essence what is promised during procurement couldn’t be delivered in practice. This is an incredibly expensive inefficiency for SH at a time, as a sector, it cannot afford it. Deep dive diligence and referencing prior to contracting is essential to out the corporates that are using their profile and size to win contracts without the functionality and capability available. I think one of your previous contributors is spot on. Do these large corporates really understand the challenges facing SH?
Channel Manager
1 周Very good read and as always Dave, spot on.
Managing Director at SDM Housing Software
1 周Thanks Dave for highlighting key issues in the housing management sector. I’d like to clarify SDM’s position following our acquisition by Volaris Group in 2022. While acquisitions can raise concerns, SDM is in a strong and positive position. Joining Volaris has provided us with financial stability and resources to grow, but we remain fully independent. We make our own decisions about how we run the business and serve our customers, ensuring our focus stays on their needs. The acquisition has enabled us to invest more in developing our software to meet the evolving needs of the sector. We pride ourselves on providing reliable, user-friendly solutions that help social housing providers work more efficiently. What sets SDM apart is our commitment to transparency and customer satisfaction. Unlike others, we dont oversell or overpromise - we deliver what we say we will. Our customers trust and success are at the heart of everything we do and always will be. I hope this offers clarity about SDM’s position. If anyone has questions, Id be happy to discuss further. It is important I speak up on this as SDM has worked incredibly hard over the past two years since the acquisition to strengthen our business and deliver for our customers.