THE DEAL THAT CHANGED EVERYTHING

THE DEAL THAT CHANGED EVERYTHING

John Martinez stared at his laptop screen, the glow reflecting off his wire-rimmed glasses. To his team at Midwest Foods & Beverages, their Chief Strategy Officer probably looked deep in acquisition spreadsheets. The $25 million dairy deal should have been straightforward - their smallest this year, but strategic for their expansion into specialty cheese.

But John wasn't looking at numbers. His hands rested on either side of his keyboard as he tried to process what his old friend Sarah had just told him over coffee. How had a seemingly perfect acquisition with every certification checked turned into a nine-figure nightmare? More importantly, what did that mean for his own deal?

Three Weeks Earlier...

Once upon a time, there was a food company looking to grow. Midwest Foods & Beverages had built its reputation on quality ingredients and reliable supply chains. There were two key players in this story: John Martinez and Sarah Chen.

John was a second-generation Mexican-American who had worked his way up through operations and strategy roles. He believed in thorough diligence and careful growth. His father had run a small tortilla factory in Chicago, teaching him that quality control wasn't just about taste - it was about trust.

Sarah came from private equity, where she had seen both spectacular successes and crushing failures. She had a sixth sense for deal complexities that came from fifteen years of buying and selling companies. She believed in looking beyond the obvious, especially when things seemed perfect.

They met for coffee on a crisp January morning. John wasn't looking for advice about cybersecurity - he was focused on closing their latest acquisition, a promising dairy processor that would help them expand into specialty cheese products.

"How's the diligence going?" Sarah asked, stirring her latte. The question seemed casual, but John knew better. Sarah never asked casual questions about deals.

"Standard process," John replied, pride creeping into his voice. "Financials look solid, operations are clean, and they've got all their certifications - including SOC 2 Type II for their systems."

Sarah's expression shifted subtly. If John hadn't known her for ten years, he might have missed it. "The cybersecurity audit?"

"Already done," John said, perhaps too quickly. "Clean report, all the boxes checked."

Sarah set down her cup with deliberate care. "Let me tell you a story about boxes being checked," she began. "About eight months ago, my firm lost hundreds of millions on what looked like a perfect deal. And it all started with those same checked boxes."

John leaned forward. Sarah rarely shared details about her deals, but when she did, it was always worth listening. He noticed she was gripping her cup a little too tightly, her knuckles white against the ceramic.

"We were acquiring a software company - bigger deal than yours, but the principles are the same," she continued. "They had every certification you could want. SOC 2, ISO 27001, perfect security questionnaires. We did the standard cyber diligence - cost us $125,000, seemed thorough at the time."

She paused, and John could see the weight of what came next in her eyes.

"Nine days after closing, everything fell apart..."


The Breach

Sarah's coffee had grown cold, untouched since she began her story. The morning crowd at Blue Bottle had thinned out, leaving them in a bubble of quiet perfect for uncomfortable truths.

"It started with a Slack message," Sarah said, pulling out her phone. "Monday morning, 6:47 AM. Our portfolio company's CTO: 'Minor authentication issues, working on it.'" She gave a bitter laugh. "By 10 AM, nearly half their customers couldn't log in. By 2 PM, we were staring at a ransom note demanding $25 million in Bitcoin."

John felt his stomach tighten. He reached for his own coffee, needing something to do with his hands. "But they had the certifications," he protested weakly, hearing how hollow it sounded.

Sarah's eyes met his. "That's exactly the problem. We checked all the boxes, but nobody checked if anyone was actually following the processes." She pulled out her tablet, her fingers dancing across the screen. "Look at this."

She turned the tablet toward him. The numbers made him wince:

```

Initial Crisis Costs:

- Ransom Payment: $25M

- Forensics/Technical: $7.5M

- Legal/PR: $4.2M

- Customer Communications: $2.1M

- Emergency Security Measures: $8.3M

```

"Forty-seven million," John whispered, doing the math. "Just in the first wave?"

"And that's not even the worst part." Sarah leaned back, running a hand through her short black hair. "The attackers had been in their systems for five months before we found them. Five months, John."

The implications hit him like a physical blow. His target company's systems controlled everything from temperature monitoring to ingredient tracking. A breach wouldn't just mean lost data - it could compromise food safety. He thought about the specialty cheese production lines they were so excited about acquiring.

"Think about it," Sarah continued, reading his expression. "Five months of access to your production systems, quality control data, supplier information..." She trailed off, letting him fill in the blanks.

John pulled out his own tablet, opening the due diligence report he'd been so proud of earlier. The words "SOC 2 Type II Compliant" seemed to mock him now. "What about insurance?" he asked, grasping for some comfort.

Sarah's laugh had no humor in it. "That's another fun story. Our carrier tried to deny coverage. Something about a 'failure to maintain security standards' exclusion." She tapped her perfectly manicured nails on the table. "And yes, that was with all those precious certifications in place."

The café had grown quieter, the morning rush over. Through the window, John could see people hurrying past, wrapped up in their own concerns. None of them knowing that just a few feet away, his entire approach to M&A was being dismantled over cooling coffee.

"So what did you do?" he asked, though he wasn't sure he wanted to know the answer.

Sarah's expression softened slightly. "That's actually the interesting part. And the reason I'm telling you all this." She pulled her chair closer, lowering her voice. "Last month, I worked with another food company on an acquisition. They brought in a specialized cybersecurity firm - not just for protection, but as a negotiating tool."

John raised an eyebrow. "Negotiating tool?"

"They found serious security issues during the enhanced audit - nothing showing up in the standard SOC 2 reports. Instead of walking away, they used the findings to negotiate. Knocked almost 15% off the purchase price, with the seller agreeing to fund immediate security improvements."

For the first time that morning, John felt a glimmer of hope. He thought about his own $25 million deal, and the growing knot of anxiety in his stomach began to loosen. "Tell me more about this enhanced audit."


The Audit Process

Three weeks later, John found himself in a conference room that felt more like a war room. The walls were covered with network diagrams and system architecture maps that reminded him of his father's old recipe flow charts, though considerably more complex. Rachel Martinez, the lead security assessor, stood before him, her presence commanding despite her small frame.

The room smelled of marker ink and cold pizza - remnants of the late-night sessions that had become routine. This wasn't the checkbox exercise he was used to. This was surgery.

"Walk me through what you've found," John said, unconsciously straightening his tie. He'd developed that habit in business school, a tell that Sarah always teased him about when he was nervous.

Rachel pulled up her preliminary findings on the screen, her movements precise and deliberate. John had chosen her team specifically because they understood food production systems - they spoke his language.

"Let's start with the production systems," Rachel began, her voice carrying the same gravity his father's had when discussing a compromised batch of tortillas. "It's not pretty."

The findings appeared on screen:

```

Initial Discoveries:

1. Production Systems

- Outdated control systems in 3 facilities

- Default passwords on key equipment

- Unpatched vulnerabilities in temperature monitoring

- No segmentation between IT and OT networks

2. Recipe Management System

- Former employees with active access

- Weak encryption on proprietary formulas

- No audit trail for recipe modifications

- Backup systems compromised

3. Supply Chain Management

- Vendor portal vulnerabilities

- Unsecured EDI connections

- Critical supplier data exposed

- Legacy systems with known exploits

```

John's pen hovered over his notepad, forgotten. "The temperature monitoring systems?" he asked, his voice tight. His father's words echoed in his head: 'Quality control isn't just about taste - it's about trust.'

Rachel nodded grimly. "Anyone with access could alter the logs. Think about your cheese aging processes - temperature variations could go completely unnoticed."

She switched to another slide, and John felt his coffee from earlier threatening to make a reappearance:

```

Business Risk Assessment:

- Food Safety Compliance: HIGH RISK

* Temperature monitoring systems vulnerable

* Quality control data integrity questionable

* Audit trail gaps in production logs

- Intellectual Property: CRITICAL RISK

* Recipe database accessible via multiple paths

* R&D documentation inadequately protected

* Trade secrets vulnerable to exfiltration

- Operational Continuity: SEVERE RISK

* Production systems susceptible to ransomware

* Backup systems compromised

* Recovery time estimated: 2-3 weeks

```

"How did their SOC 2 audit miss all this?" John asked, echoing his earlier conversation with Sarah. The words tasted bitter now.

Rachel's response was measured, but he could hear the frustration in her voice. "Traditional audits are like checking if a restaurant has a health code certificate on the wall. We're actually going into the kitchen and testing the food safety procedures."

The next day brought another revelation. John sat across from Mark Chen (no relation to Sarah, he'd checked) from Lockton, their deal insurance provider. The meeting wasn't going as expected, but not in the way he'd feared.

"Based on these findings," Mark explained, adjusting his glasses, "we'd have to significantly modify our coverage terms. The standard cyber policy wouldn't cover most of these pre-existing conditions."

John braced himself, but then Mark smiled. "However, if you implement the recommended security improvements before closing, we can offer enhanced coverage at preferred rates. This is exactly the kind of proactive due diligence we've been advocating for."

Later that evening, John found himself doing the math for the third time:

```

Original Deal Structure:

- Purchase Price: $25M

- Standard Insurance: $180K/year

- Basic Security Audit: $75K

New Reality:

- Identified Security Issues: $2.8M value

- Enhanced Audit Cost: $275K

- Remediation (Seller Funded): $2.8M

- New Insurance Rate: $140K/year

```

His phone buzzed - a text from Sarah: "How's the enhanced audit going?"

John smiled as he typed back: "Remember when you said it could be a negotiating tool? We just found $2.8M worth of leverage."

Sarah's response came quickly: "Now you're thinking like a dealmaker. Coffee tomorrow?"

John looked at the network diagrams still covering his conference room walls. The audit had revealed more than just security issues - it had shown him a new way to think about value in acquisitions.

"Coffee tomorrow," he replied. "I have a story to tell you this time."


The Negotiation

The seller's conference room felt different from John's war room. Everything was too polished, too perfect - like their SOC 2 certification. The mahogany table gleamed under recessed lighting, and the view of downtown Chicago stretched out behind the target company's management team like a statement of power.

John sat across from them, Rachel to his right, his deal team to his left. The target company's CEO, David Thompson, sat directly opposite him, flanked by his CFO and CTO. The audit findings were projected on the screen between them, the stark bullet points cutting through the room's carefully crafted atmosphere.

"This is unprecedented," David protested, his perfectly pressed suit somehow making him look more uncomfortable, not less. "We've never had a buyer dig this deep into our systems."

John thought about his father's factory, how he'd insist on testing every batch of masa himself, no matter how many certifications their suppliers had. "That's exactly why we're here," he replied quietly.

Rachel stepped in, her voice carrying that same measured tone she'd used with John three weeks ago. "The issues were always there, Mr. Thompson. Nobody looked, so nobody found them. But they've been there, waiting to be exploited."

John pulled out a single sheet of paper and slid it across the mahogany expanse:

```

Proposed Deal Revision:

1. Purchase price reduced by $3.2M

- $2.8M for identified security issues

- $400K for business risk adjustment

2. Seller Commitments:

- Fund immediate critical fixes

- Implement security improvements

- Third-party verification before closing

3. Buyer Commitments:

- Technical support during transition

- Expedited closing timeline

- Enhanced insurance coverage

```

The CFO, Janet Miller, picked up the paper. John watched as her eyes moved down the page, her expression shifting from defensive to thoughtful. He'd expected this - financial people understood numbers better than arguments.

"The remediation costs..." she began, then paused, doing mental calculations. "These are actually quite reasonable. I was expecting worse after seeing the audit."

The CTO shifted uncomfortably in his chair. John had learned his name was Mike Peterson, and he'd been with the company for fifteen years. The same fifteen years many of their systems had gone unpatched.

"Some of these findings are debatable," Mike started, but Janet cut him off.

"Are they, Mike? Because I'm looking at our insurance renewal quotes, and they're not debating anything." She turned to David. "This actually makes sense. We'd rather fix these issues now than deal with a breach later."

John watched David's face as the CEO processed this shift in the room. He'd seen that expression before - in his father's eyes the day they'd discovered a supplier had been cutting corners with their corn quality.

"The price adjustment," David said slowly, "it's not just about the technical fixes, is it?"

John shook his head. "It's about trust. And rebuilding it properly." He gestured to the screen where the audit findings still glowed. "Every one of these issues is fixable. But they tell a story about processes, about culture. The price adjustment isn't a penalty - it's an investment in changing that story."

The room fell silent. Through the windows, John could see the afternoon sun catching on the Chicago River, making it glitter like the promise of something new.

David looked at his CFO, then his CTO, then back at John. "We'll need to review the specific remediation plans. And the timeline."

John nodded, feeling the tension in the room shift from confrontational to collaborative. He pulled out another document - the one Rachel had helped him prepare the night before.

"We've broken it down into three phases," he began, but his phone buzzed in his pocket. A text from Sarah: "How's it going?"

He smiled slightly, remembering their coffee conversation that had started all this. "The story's not over yet," he typed back quickly, then returned his attention to the room.

It was time to rebuild some trust.


Building the Security Foundation

John stood at his office window a month later, watching the Chicago winter settle in. The morning frost on the glass reminded him of the crystalline patterns that formed on aging cheese - patterns that could only develop under precisely controlled conditions. Behind him, Rachel was setting up for another meeting, this one different from their usual audit sessions.

"None of our acquisition targets had dedicated security teams for their production systems," Rachel said, arranging her papers on the conference table. "'IT handles that' was always the response." She said the words with the same tone Sarah used when discussing checkbox compliance.

John turned from the window, his reflection replaced by the reality of what they needed to build. The war room had evolved - gone were the urgent red-marked diagrams, replaced by structured plans and architectural drawings. They weren't just fixing problems anymore; they were building something new.

"My father used to say that quality control isn't a department - it's a mindset," John said, settling into his chair. "Maybe security needs to be the same way."

Rachel nodded, pulling up her presentation. The screen filled with what John had started calling their security recipe:

```

Security Team Structure:

1. Production Security Operations

- Control system specialists

- Recipe protection experts

- Quality control system monitors

- Supply chain security analysts

2. Compliance & Safety Team

- FDA compliance specialists

- FSMA security experts

- HACCP system monitors

- Audit response team

3. Incident Response Team

- Production recovery specialists

- Recipe protection responders

- Supply chain continuity experts

- Customer communication team

```

"It looks expensive," John mused, thinking about his upcoming board presentation. The numbers below the organizational chart were substantial:

```

Annual Investment:

- Core Team (12 people): $1.8M

- Tools and Systems: $800K

- Training and Certification: $400K

- External Audits: $300K

```

Rachel's expression reminded him of Sarah's that first morning at Blue Bottle. "Compare it to the cost of a breach," she said quietly. "Or a food safety incident."

John's phone buzzed - another text from Sarah: "Heard you're building a security team from scratch. Bold move."

He smiled, typing back: "Remember when you said cybersecurity wasn't just about protection? We're making it about value creation."

The security protocols they were developing were as detailed as any recipe his father had ever written:

```

Production System Security:

1. Recipe Protection

- Multi-factor authentication for formula access

- Encrypted recipe database

- Change tracking and versioning

- Access logging and monitoring

2. Production Line Security

- Isolated control systems

- Regular vulnerability scanning

- Temperature monitoring integrity

- Equipment access controls

3. Supply Chain Protection

- Vendor system security requirements

- Ingredient tracking security

- Transportation monitoring

- Cold chain integrity verification

```

But their most innovative creation was what Rachel had dubbed the "Security-First Production" protocol. John liked to think of it as HACCP for the digital age - his father would have appreciated that.

"Think of it like taste-testing at every stage of production," Rachel explained to the operations team later that week. "But instead of checking flavor, we're checking security."

The protocol was elegantly simple:

```

Security-First Production Steps:

1. Pre-Production

- System integrity verification

- Recipe version confirmation

- Equipment security check

- Ingredient tracking validation

2. During Production

- Real-time monitoring

- Temperature log verification

- Access control enforcement

- Quality check validation

3. Post-Production

- Batch record security

- Distribution tracking

- Customer system integration

- Compliance documentation

```

As John reviewed the final draft, his office door opened. Mike Peterson, the target company's CTO, stepped in - a surprise visitor from their acquisition target. The past month of remediation work had changed him; gone was the defensive posture from the negotiation room.

"Your security requirements seemed excessive at first," Mike admitted, settling into a chair. "Now I see them as a competitive advantage." He paused, looking at the protocol displayed on the screen. "I've been thinking about some additions to the recipe protection module..."

John's phone buzzed again. Sarah had sent another text: "Coffee next week? Want to hear how this story ends."

He looked at Mike, already deep in discussion with Rachel about encryption algorithms and temperature monitoring systems. At the security protocol that was becoming as fundamental to their operations as his father's recipe testing had been to the tortilla factory.

"Story's not ending," he typed back to Sarah. "It's just beginning."


The Financial Sector Response

John found himself in a different kind of conference room two weeks later. Gone were the network diagrams and security protocols. Instead, the walls held framed stock certificates and banking awards. The room smelled of leather and money - the kind of place where deals were blessed or buried.

Michael Chen from their lead bank sat across from him, bow tie slightly askew, reading glasses perched on his nose as he reviewed their new security protocols. John had known Michael for years - he'd helped structure the financing for three previous acquisitions. But he'd never seen the banker quite this animated.

"This changes everything about how we evaluate food industry deals," Michael said, removing his glasses and setting them carefully on the polished table. "We're not just looking at EBITDA anymore - we're looking at cyber resilience."

John thought about how his father would have reacted to that term - cyber resilience. He probably would have compared it to the resilience of a good sourdough starter, something that needed constant attention but made everything better.

The banking group's new requirements reflected this shift in thinking:

```

New Lending Requirements:

1. Security Due Diligence

- Enhanced cyber audit mandatory

- Production system security review

- Recipe protection assessment

- Supply chain security verification

2. Ongoing Monitoring

- Quarterly security metrics

- Monthly compliance reports

- Real-time incident notification

- Annual penetration testing

3. Covenant Requirements

- Minimum security spending levels

- Required team staffing

- Regular system updates

- Incident response readiness

```

But the real revolution came during his meeting with Lockton and Gallagher the next day. The insurance executives didn't just want to talk about policies - they wanted to talk about transformation.

"We're completely revising our food industry policies," explained Lisa Wong, Lockton's lead underwriter. She reminded John of Rachel - the same precise way of speaking, the same focus on details that others missed. "Companies with enhanced security protocols like yours are now our preferred risk category."

The numbers told a compelling story:

```

Insurance Impact:

Standard Policy (Pre-Enhancement):

- Premium: $800K/year

- Deductible: $2M

- Coverage Limits: $25M

- Multiple Exclusions

Enhanced Security Policy:

- Premium: $500K/year

- Deductible: $1M

- Coverage Limits: $50M

- Broader Coverage

```

John's phone buzzed - Sarah again: "Heard Lockton's using your security framework as their new standard. Not bad for three months' work."

He smiled, remembering their first coffee conversation that had started all this. The most significant change had come in their deal insurance:

```

M&A Insurance Changes:

Traditional Structure:

- Basic reps & warranties

- Cyber exclusions

- Limited coverage

- High premiums

New Structure:

- Enhanced cyber coverage

- Production system protection

- Recipe liability included

- Reduced premiums

```

"It's simple math for us," Lisa continued, echoing Rachel's words from months ago. "Companies with robust security programs have fewer claims. We'd rather give you a discount up front than pay for a breach later."

The banking syndicate followed suit, adjusting their terms:

```

Loan Terms Impact:

Original Terms:

- Interest: L+350

- Quarterly Compliance

- Standard Covenants

- Basic Reporting

Enhanced Security Terms:

- Interest: L+275

- Monthly Monitoring

- Security Covenants

- Real-time Reporting

```

Later that evening, John sat in his office, watching the city lights come on. His father had taught him that quality wasn't an expense - it was an investment. Now he was teaching the financial world the same thing about security.

His phone lit up with a final text from Sarah: "Ready to tell the industry how you did it?"

John looked at the presentation he'd been preparing for next month's Food Industry Alliance conference. The title slide read: "How Cybersecurity is Reshaping Food Industry M&A."

"The reduced interest rate alone pays for the enhanced security program," he typed back. "But that's not even the best part."

"Oh?" Sarah replied.

"The best part is that we're not just protecting value anymore," he wrote. "We're creating it."

Through his window, he could see the lights of other office buildings, knowing that behind each one were people making decisions about security, about value, about trust. The industry was changing, one deal at a time.

And it had all started with a cup of coffee and a horror story.


One Year Later: The New Standard

John stood at the podium of the Food Industry Alliance's annual conference, adjusting his tie - that old nervous habit Sarah still teased him about. The room was packed with faces he recognized: CEOs from major food companies, investment bankers who'd once dismissed cybersecurity as an IT problem, insurance executives who now spoke about security like his father had spoken about quality control.

The screen behind him showed a single slide: "How One Deal Changed an Industry." Sarah sat in the front row, that knowing smile on her face - the same one she'd worn when she first told him her horror story over coffee a year ago.

"A year ago," John began, his voice steady despite the butterflies, "I thought I was just doing another acquisition. Today, I'm going to tell you how one enhanced cyber audit changed not just our company, but our entire industry's approach to deal-making."

He clicked to the next slide, and the numbers told their own story:

```

Industry Impact After One Year:

Deals with Enhanced Cyber Diligence:

- Average price adjustment: 8-15%

- Insurance premium reduction: 20-30%

- Post-closing incidents: Near zero

Traditional Diligence Deals:

- Post-closing security issues: 45%

- Average remediation cost: $2.5M

- Insurance premium increases: 15-25%

```

After his presentation, John found himself in a quiet corner with James Wilson, CEO of one of the largest dairy producers in the country. The older executive had that look John recognized - the same one he'd had himself a year ago.

"We killed a $40 million acquisition last month," James admitted, swirling the coffee in his cup - the conference center's brew a far cry from Blue Bottle. "Enhanced audit found their production systems were completely exposed. A year ago, we wouldn't have even looked."

The transformation had been comprehensive. John pulled out his tablet to show James how the industry had evolved:

```

1. Deal Structure Changes:

Pre-Audit Era:

- Basic cyber review

- Standard reps and warranties

- Post-closing remediation

New Standard:

- Enhanced security audit

- Detailed security schedules

- Pre-closing remediation

- Insurance-backed guarantees

2. Industry Protocols:

New Requirements:

- Active threat hunting

- Production system testing

- Recipe protection verification

- Supply chain security review

- Regulatory compliance validation

3. Insurance Evolution:

Policy Changes:

- Preferred rates for audited deals

- Coverage tied to security measures

- Pre-closing assessments required

- Continuous monitoring mandated

```

His phone buzzed - a text from Rachel: "Another seller doing pre-sale security audit. They're learning."

Later that day, John met with his board to review their acquisition pipeline. The conversation had a different flavor now:

"Start with the security assessment," his CEO requested. "Everything else is negotiable."

The numbers justified their new approach:

```

Midwest Foods & Beverages - Year One Results:

Acquisitions Reviewed: 8

- Proceeded with enhanced terms: 4

- Rejected due to security: 2

- Sellers withdrew to fix issues: 2

Financial Impact:

- Total purchase price reductions: $12.4M

- Insurance savings: $800K/year

- Avoided remediation costs: $15M+

```

But the real validation came from unexpected places. The FDA had taken notice of their enhanced due diligence protocol, particularly the focus on production system security. They were now in discussions about making similar requirements standard for food industry acquisitions.

That evening, John met Sarah at their usual Blue Bottle spot. The café looked the same, but everything else had changed.

"Remember when we thought this was just about cybersecurity?" John asked, stirring his latte.

Sarah smiled, that knowing look in her eyes. "Now it's about fundamentally changing how we value and protect companies," she replied. "The food industry is just the beginning."

His phone buzzed again - another banker with another deal. But now he knew the first question to ask:

"Have they done the enhanced security audit?"

Because in modern M&A, especially in the food industry, cybersecurity wasn't just a technical issue anymore.

It was the foundation of value creation.

Miguel Saenz

Director/VP | Agile Operational Maestro | Strategic Disruptor | AI & GTM Virtuoso | Enterprise Evolutionist | Former Microsoft, Dell, Oracle | 303-669-7244

2 天前

Robert Flores, your insights shared in this article highlight a crucial shift in M&A strategy. Cybersecurity isn't just a checkbox anymore; it's integral to building trust and value. Just today, Richard Bird wrote" No one in the enterprise C-suite has their compensation tied to security performance. The costs of security are top-rolled, meaning that no one in the enteprise actually pays for their per unit consumption of security - even though they pay on a per unit basis for every other bit of technology that they use. The financial incentives associated with security performance aren't out-of-whack; they are non-existent." John's journey from a routine acquisition to a transformative approach is a testament to the importance of thorough diligence. You said it when you wrote"Companies with robust security programs have fewer claims. We'd rather give you a discount up front than pay for a breach later.... It's simple math" As we navigate digital transformation, let's prioritize security as a core component of our growth strategies. Thank you for sharing a the real use-case and lessons learned Robert Flores! ? CyberSweep #Cybersecurity #Leadership #CxO #Innovation #CostSavings #InsuranceSavings #Masa #Risks #PrivateEquity

回复
Karla Rico

Senior M&A Advisor at Generational Group

1 周

Robert, your insights are always invaluable! Your dedication to sharing knowledge in cybersecurity is truly commendable. This comprehensive article is sure to be a game-changer for many. Keep inspiring!

回复
Anders Mikkelsen

Helping CIOs Save Up to 50% on Voice & Data Costs, Fueling Innovation While Enhancing Budget Visibility and Control

1 个月

I remember running into a firm black fog which focused around making sure important data couldn’t leave a firms premises. Interesting thesis.

Anders Mikkelsen

Helping CIOs Save Up to 50% on Voice & Data Costs, Fueling Innovation While Enhancing Budget Visibility and Control

1 个月

I thought this was interesting. "The issues were always there, Mr. Thompson. Nobody looked, so nobody found them. But they've been there, waiting to be exploited." I see this all the time with how firms manage their vendor spending on services like Telecom data and voice - or cloud or SaaS or anything complex. Vendors end up billing as much as twice what they should.

Anders Mikkelsen

Helping CIOs Save Up to 50% on Voice & Data Costs, Fueling Innovation While Enhancing Budget Visibility and Control

1 个月

This is great. It provides clear details not just hand waving.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Robert Flores的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了