Day 0.
When you're tired of the same old conversations about politics, here's the power take: In your obsessive search for certainty, you get distracted by the wrong things: When will it happen? What time will it come? How will they act?
And in your confusion, you tangle with certainty in ways that make?you?sick. And then you think the people around you are unwell.
But it's you who analyzes too much, talks too much, worries too much, withdraws too much.
Uncertainty is not an event;?it’s an energy.?Understand this; change everything.
When you confuse uncertainty for an event—for this conversation, for this problem, for this outcome—you waste your energy trying to run ghosts to the ground.
You don’t need certainty.?You need a more powerful identity.
The most important question of today is not when the outcome will come but?who will you be when it does.
Emotional power?is?the intelligence of the future—in politics, in relationships, in finance. In everything. And I’m here to talk to you about it.
Day 0. Let's go, America.
For a blueprint on how to handle uncertainty in the most powerful ways, check out, check out?Energy Rising: https://lnkd.in/gXedjs3Z
Top 100 HR Global HR Influencer | HRE's 2024 Top 100 HR Tech Influencers | Speaker | Future of HR
4 个月I long the days when a candidate we would disagree with, but was decent, could win. We would say "well, I disagree with this person, but I still think the country will be ok by the end of this term". That's not true in this election, because if certain candidate wins I don't think we will be able to recognize our country after four years. I want a day 0 like that. When the candidates that we disagree with were still patriots (Romney, McCain, etc.), intrinsically decent, and, though with a different point of view, wanted the best for all of us. Let's see.
Enrique Rubio (he/him), Pete Mockaitis and Andy Kaufman: Given our prior conversations about managing uncertainty and leadership, I'd love to hear what you think.