Dawn of the Agents: Moving from AI Demos to Customer-Ready Products
Agents have been the buzzword of the past few months, and there's a lot to unpack. My goal today is simple: to demystify what agents are, to explore how they make AI products more reliable, and to illuminate how agents create a pathway toward something customers are willing to pay for—not just something users find interesting.
The difference between a good AI demo and a product lies in how they handle edge cases, guardrails, reliability and scale.
Demos often showcase ideal scenarios, but products must be built to handle edge cases—those unpredictable, less common situations that can break functionality. Products also need guardrails, ensuring alignment with business needs and compliance standards, which demos might not address. Finally, reliability and scale is crucial: while a demo works well in controlled conditions, a product must maintain reliability and performance as user demand grows and always produce consistent output. The agent framework can enable these critical elements—guardrails, scale, and handling edge cases—turning demos into robust, customer-ready products. If you had a AI use case such as RAG, moving it Agent Framework can only make it more reliable, safe and aligned to business goals.
Understanding AI Agents & their Design Patterns
The traditional definition of an agent is a piece of software that acts independently, learning from its environment to execute tasks and make decisions on behalf of the user. It anticipates needs, adapts, and continuously optimizes—all without constant human guidance (i.e. shows agency).
In contrast, an AI or LLM agent is a software system powered by an LLM (Large Language Model) that accomplishes tasks for the user by understanding context, planning, and executing tasks with various tools or APIs. It also reflects on its own output and reviews its work, iterating until the task is accomplished to satisfaction. A key distinction between a LLM and a LLM agent is that the LLM agent continues working on the problem through multiple attempts and iterations which leads to better reliability and reduced hallucinations.
Andrew Ng's framework for building AI agents outlines four key design patterns: Reflection, where agents analyze their own work; Tool Use, allowing interaction with external systems; Planning, breaking down tasks strategically; and Multi-Agent Collaboration, enabling agents to work together.
The reflection pattern helps solve hallucination and alignment problems by having agents double-check their outputs and only present results to users when they meet quality standards. This ensures that the output is reliable and accurate, leading to a more trustworthy user experience.
Tool use in AI agents is essential because it allows them to interact with external systems and databases, expanding their capabilities beyond simple text generation. They also help delegate tasks that LLMs are not well-suited for, such as number crunching and data processing, allowing appropriate software or code to handle these tasks more efficiently.
Planning is crucial in AI agent workflows, especially for complex tasks, as it enables the agent to break down the objective into smaller, manageable subtasks. This strategic decomposition allows the agent to determine the most effective sequence of actions, potentially involving tool use and reflection, to successfully reach the desired outcome. Planning focuses on a single agent strategically decomposing a task into a sequence of subtasks, determining the necessary steps, and utilizing various tools along the way. This process is analogous to creating a detailed to-do list and then methodically working through it, ensuring each step is completed efficiently and effectively.
The final pattern Multi-Agent Collaboration, on the other hand, involves multiple agents, each potentially with specialized roles and expertise, working together to achieve a common goal. These agents might communicate, share information, and even debate ideas to arrive at a solution. This is akin to a team of experts collaborating on a project, each contributing their unique skills and perspectives. In reality we would be combining reflection, planning, tool usage and multi agent collaboration together to right size the design for Agent AI System.
Frameworks like Autogen , Crew AI, LangSmith , LangChain enable you to quickly implement multi agent patterns by taking care of boilerplate code for message passing, keeping track of tasks. If you are into Software Development agents ChatDev has some good inbuilt tooling / plugins for Software Development Automation. Personally, my go to has been Autogen and would recommend it for new users.
Disclaimer: Multi-Agent Collaboration Software are still works in progress. There is significant variability in their performance, so I would not yet recommend using this pattern for building reliable products, yet.
How do I get started on Agents?
AutoGen is an open-source programming framework that simplifies building AI agents and facilitates their collaboration to solve tasks. Combined with low-code / no-code AutoGen Studio, it provides a user-friendly interface for creating and managing multi-agent systems without extensive technical expertise. To get started, you'll need Python and basic programming knowledge. The GitHub project offers Jupyter Notebooks to guide you through setup and initial projects, making it accessible for newcomers to engage with most common AI workflows. Below is a HelloWorld example showcasing agent coding for the user, contrasting with a standard non-agent approach
Implementing Agent Systems: Challenges and Opportunities
To implement agent systems effectively, begin by identifying the key tasks your agents need to perform. Consider the types of tools and APIs required for these tasks, and determine how the agent will reflect and iterate to ensure reliable outcomes. For simpler implementations, prioritize using Reflection and Tool Use patterns, as they have proven reliable in practice.
领英推è
Guardrails, Safety, Alignment:
Reflection is particularly important for handling edge cases, enforcing guardrails, and ensuring responsible AI behavior. It involves checking for prompt injection attacks, multi-prompt manipulation, and reviewing all outputs to ensure they align with business rules, maintain a friendly tone, and are factually correct. This thorough reflection and validation process constitutes 80% of the work in building dependable AI agents. Never show direct output to user without running through using?Nvidia Guardrails, ?Azure AI Content Safety?or Llama Guard or other products that are focused on AI Safety.
Reliability, Accuracy and Consistency:
Tool use improves reliability, accuracy, and consistency by ensuring agents leverage the most appropriate tools for specific tasks. For example, instead of relying on an LLM for complex calculations, using a calculator API ensures precision. Similarly, using a SQL API for data retrieval guarantees accuracy and efficiency. This targeted approach minimizes errors and helps maintain consistent output quality, ultimately enhancing the overall dependability of the AI system.
Here are some examples of tools: Calculators or Math APIs, SQL Procedures or APIs to retrieve data, Web Scraping Tools (e.g., BeautifulSoup, Scrapy), Sentiment Analysis APIs, Vision and OCR APIs, Translation APIs (e.g., Google Translate), Weather or Stock Market APIs, File Parsing Libraries (e.g., Pandas for CSVs), Speech-to-Text Tools (e.g., Google Speech Recognition), Automation Tools (e.g., Selenium). Make sure your tools are unit tested and have input and output sanitation using reflection pattern.
Scaling:
Agents are inherently chatty and tend to use more tokens compared to prompts. To manage this efficiently, consider using smaller language models like Llama 3.2, Phi, or Gemma, which are fine-tuned for specific domains. Additionally, token costs are steadily dropping, so it's wise to monitor leaderboards for the most cost-effective and scalable LLM providers. Investing in LLM observability tools is also crucial for understanding and debugging production issues in agent systems.
Summary of Agent Systems
AI agents enhance automation, reliability, and efficiency by leveraging guardrails for safety, using specialized tools, and adopting patterns like reflection and planning. Despite challenges such as token usage, system complexity, and debugging, the right strategies can transform agents from demos to reliable, customer-ready products.
Real-World Examples of AI Agents
ChatGPT: ChatGPT exemplifies a powerful AI agent that not only generates conversational text but also effectively uses tools like python code generator to expand its functionality. By integrating various APIs, ChatGPT can perform specific tasks like calculations, retrieving external data, and providing contextual answers. It also applies reflection and guardrails to review and validate responses, ensuring quality, accuracy, and alignment with user needs.
Customer Support Bots: AI agents like ChatGPT-based customer support bots provide 24/7 assistance, handling routine queries and improving response time, leading to better customer satisfaction. Companies like Dukaan and Klarna have replaced significant portions of their support staff with AI agents—Dukaan laid off 90% of its customer support team, and Klarna used AI to perform tasks equivalent to 700 customer service agents. Similarly, Duolingo reduced its contractor workforce by 10% after adopting AI for content translation.
Software Development: SWE Workbench is an evaluation framework designed to test language models on real-world software engineering challenges. It includes 2,294 problems from GitHub issues and pull requests, requiring AI agents to edit codebases, handle multiple files, and perform sophisticated reasoning. The recent SWE-bench Verified, a human-validated subset, highlights that agent-based models like Gru (45.2% resolution) and Honeycomb outperform traditional language models (7% resolution with RAG + Claude 3 Opus) by effectively tackling complex tasks, demonstrating the growing capabilities and dominance of agents in this space.
Finance and Investments: AI agents are increasingly being adopted in financial analysis and portfolio management. GPT Investor Portfolio leverages language models like GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 to provide investment strategies and manage portfolios, showcasing significant returns (sometimes losses too) compared to traditional benchmarks like S&P. Platforms like MLQ.ai combine AI-driven insights with financial and alternative data to assist investors with market analysis, while Axyon AI and AlphaSense use AI for investment predictions, market tracking, and risk reduction.
E-commerce and Shopping: Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is particularly effective in improving product discovery. Many AI agents also personalize user experiences by analyzing browsing behaviors and purchase histories to recommend products in real time, enhancing customer satisfaction and driving sales. These assistants are still in the early stages, and companies may be pushing them into deployment too quickly, leading to mixed outcomes.?However, with continued improvements and feedback, their effectiveness will likely grow significantly over time.
Key Takeaways and Future Directions
AI agents are transforming how we think about automation and intelligence, moving from demos to robust, customer-ready products. By employing design patterns like reflection, tool use, and planning, agents bring reliability and scalability to real-world applications.
However, the journey from a demo to a product is not instant—this process will take months or even years to mature, and rushing it could lead to failure or compromise user trust. It is important to take time to thoroughly test, iterate, and ensure these systems are safe and reliable.
The dawn of agents represents more than a technological leap; it's a fundamental shift in how we leverage AI for tangible outcomes. Leaders need to focus on implementing agent frameworks thoughtfully, ensuring they not only drive efficiencies but also uphold user trust. The future lies in building agents that serve intelligently, safely, and ethically—delivering on the promise of AI that works with and for us.
Data & AI Leader
5 个月Nice summary Giri, one of the challange of using smaller models in Agentic framework has been that it goes in iterative loops for more complex planning and does not achieve stop conditions, and may require a determinsitic orchestration.
Excel & AI Productivity Expert | Microsoft Certified Trainer (MCT) | Helping Professionals Save 10+ Hours Weekly Through Technology
5 个月Love this, Giri! Moving from AI demos to reliable, customer-ready products is such an important leap. In my AI for Leaders course, Lesson 4.2 focuses on identifying AI use cases and allocating resources effectively, helping leaders ensure their AI initiatives scale seamlessly and handle complex edge cases. It’s great to see you pushing this forward! Let’s connect, make it a great day! ??
Founder: Bryckel AI | Automating complex real estate workflows are my playground
5 个月Well explained and couldn’t agree more on the guardrails! Agents behavior can turn odd- We have experienced the opposite of chatty. One liner bomb with no explanation!