Data Investor – A New Name for a Data Owner

Let’s put a fresh twist on a familiar concept in data governance. We’ve all heard the term “Data Owner” tossed around in boardrooms and governance meetings. It makes sense, right? Someone’s got to own the data, manage it, and be accountable for it. But what if I told you that thinking of people as "Data Owners" might not be the best way to approach it? Instead, let’s try something more forward-thinking: calling them “Data Investors.” Now, before you roll your eyes and think this is just another trendy rebranding, let me explain why this shift could bring about real benefits, especially when viewed through the lens of Non-Invasive Data Governance (NIDG).

First, let’s break down the term “Data Owner.” It’s been around for years and implies control, responsibility, and accountability over a specific dataset. While it gets the point across, it can also sound a bit ... possessive and … even a bit invasive. Ownership implies that the data is a static asset to be kept and guarded, like a treasure chest hidden away from everyone else. In the context of Non-Invasive Data Governance, this mindset can create resistance because ownership also sounds a lot like another job title – one that gets dumped on someone without them asking for it. When people are “assigned” to be Data Owners, it can feel like a burden they never wanted, and worse yet, they might not even fully understand what they’re supposed to do with it. Ownership comes with an implied exclusivity that doesn’t necessarily align with the collaborative spirit of NIDG.

Now, let’s consider the term “Data Investor.” Doesn’t that feel different already? It has a more proactive and engaged vibe to it. Instead of guarding data like a dragon protecting its stash, a Data Investor sees the potential for growth, value, and, yes, a return on investment (ROI) from how they manage, share, and enhance data. In the Non-Invasive Data Governance world, this shift in mindset aligns perfectly with how we emphasize accountability without adding unnecessary burden. Data Investors aren’t just responsible for the data they handle; they are actively contributing to its value within the organization. They’re aware that their “investment” in data management practices leads to better decisions, improved processes, and a stronger data culture overall. It's no longer about ownership in the possessive sense; it’s about contribution and engagement.

But there are two sides to every coin, right? The upside of calling people Data Investors is clear: it promotes a more dynamic, value-driven relationship with data. It encourages individuals to think beyond just holding and managing data and to consider the broader implications of its use. It frames their role as part of a collective strategy to unlock the value of data, which feels far more empowering and forward-looking. This fits beautifully with NIDG’s philosophy of integrating governance naturally into existing roles and responsibilities without making people feel overwhelmed or burdened by the title of “Owner.”

On the flip side, however, not everyone might immediately buy into the idea of being a “Data Investor.” For some, this might feel like just another buzzword, or worse, something that adds more pressure. They might think, “Now I have to invest in this?!” In reality, the concept behind the term doesn’t ask for anything more than what’s already expected in a good data governance framework – it simply reframes the way we think about it. But let’s not pretend: rebranding a job or responsibility, no matter how well-intentioned, can sometimes lead to confusion. Some folks might still prefer the old-school clarity of “ownership” because it’s straightforward, even if it’s not as inspiring.

In the end, whether you call someone a Data Owner or a Data Investor, the goal remains the same: ensuring that data is managed, governed, and used effectively across the organization. Non-Invasive Data Governance is all about embedding these responsibilities into existing processes in a way that feels natural and non-disruptive. So, the next time you’re talking about data governance, ask yourself this: do you want people to feel like they own a piece of the data puzzle, or do you want them to invest in its value and future? In my approach to data governance, the latter sets a more engaging tone for the journey ahead.

?

Non-Invasive Data Governance? is a trademark of Robert S. Seiner / KIK Consulting & Educational Services

Copyright ? 2024 – Robert S. Seiner and KIK Consulting & Educational Services