Darwall v Dartmoor NPA (9): How To End Your Speech
The End - Alexas Fotos on Pixabay

Darwall v Dartmoor NPA (9): How To End Your Speech

The parts of your Advocacy over which you most have (and wish) control are the beginning and end. You will need both a plan and some flexibility in the middle - but you should know both how you intend to start and also how you want to end. (Indeed in Trial Advocacy standard advice is - start with where you want to end) Your Opening has a formula - especially if you are Senior Appellant. There is a bit more flexibility about Endings, but not about their objectives:-

  1. Make Clear (again) to the Court what you want
  2. Make Clear (again) the main reasons why you should get it
  3. Invite the Court to put to you any final queries/ questions/ objections
  4. Make Clear that you have finished

The last of those means much more than just sitting down!

Items 1 and 2 will be a summary of your main points - perhaps repeated from your Opening, probably adapted somewhat to fit better the Court's concerns.

Item 3 is critical - however much of a hurry you are in, you have not finished until the Court gives permission. A common formula is:-

  • Unless I can be of further assistance to the Court ... ?

Then remain standing while you await the reply - probably a few questions. Vary that wording each time you need to check, until a final 'Thankyou, Mr Heald,' when you say:-

  • May it please the Court, those are my submissions.

Then, having done Item 4, you sit down to signal you have truly finished. (Of course, if the Court remembers something, you leap to your feet again)

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Richard Heald的更多文章

  • A Midsummer Night’s Guising

    A Midsummer Night’s Guising

    Heritage Hub Launch Event To the Groundlings’ Theatre west of the Richmond Building for a University of Portsmouth…

  • Gresham's Law of AI Impact - Explained Better

    Gresham's Law of AI Impact - Explained Better

    I had been writing a lengthy (as usual - Ed) article trying to reason out (and test at the same time) my intuition that…

    2 条评论
  • Art for Art's Sake

    Art for Art's Sake

    I have been reflecting on why I contentedly use AI-generated art (with due credit) but insist on writing every actual…

  • Gods Monsters & Property Law

    Gods Monsters & Property Law

    As some Bank Holiday reading, I have been greatly enjoying Natalie Haynes' Divine Might - her sequel to the equally…

  • The Just Bot Justices (3) - Lady Rose and the Robo-Judges

    The Just Bot Justices (3) - Lady Rose and the Robo-Judges

    I am very grateful to my colleague Alison Poole for drawing my attention to some recent speeches by Lady Rose in…

  • The Just Bot Justices (2B)

    The Just Bot Justices (2B)

    Many aspects of the Socio-Legal Studies Association (SLSA) 2024 Conference in Portsmouth just over a week ago gave me…

  • Reverse Academic Poster - Test 1

    Reverse Academic Poster - Test 1

    (big thanks - as so often - to Dr Andrew Clegg, SFHEA, NTF, IFNTF for the idea) As Andy implied in his earlier post…

  • The Just Bot Justices - Update

    The Just Bot Justices - Update

    I am very grateful for - and much enjoyed - the privilege of presenting my thoughts on this so far at the SLSA…

    2 条评论
  • A Pizza AI?

    A Pizza AI?

    I would no more use a microwave oven for cookery than I would order a takeaway from a restaurant where I do not have…

  • The Just Bot - or Just a Bot?

    The Just Bot - or Just a Bot?

    We learn from the Canadian Legal Information Institute (CanLII) of the intriguing case of Moffatt v Air Canada [2024]…

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了