The Dangers and Perils of Tech Dependencies in Legal Firms
Legal Technology & Innovation Institute
'Transforming your technology challenges into opportunities'
The recent #CrowdStrike outage is a stark reminder of the risks associated with heavy reliance on technology and the need for law firms to scrutinise their tech dependencies. While technology enhances efficiency, it also introduces vulnerabilities. The outage disrupted operations across various sectors, including legal services, highlighting the necessity for legal firms to not take vendor assurances as gospel.
Are we surprised? The global impact of the CrowdStrike outage is indeed surprising and highlights the interconnectedness and dependence of modern systems on key technology vendors. Such widespread disruptions underscore the vulnerabilities in relying on single points of failure within IT infrastructure. Precedents for global tech outages exist, such as the AWS outages that have similarly caused widespread disruptions across various sectors.
Key Insights:
The CrowdStrike outage serves as a wake-up call for law firms to reevaluate their tech dependencies and adopt a more cautious and proactive approach. By diversifying their technology providers, enforcing strict vendor accountability, and maintaining robust contingency plans, firms can safeguard their operations against future disruptions. As gatekeepers of sensitive client information, law firms must prioritise security and operational resilience to uphold their fiduciary duties and maintain client trust.
Whilst CrowdStrike’s Falcon system was throwing law firms and many others into chaos, it was a day of blissful ignorance for the Mac users, tapping away as if the sky hadn’t just fallen. It’s almost poetic that Apple’s walled garden—a fortress many love to hate—turned out to be the serene sanctuary in this storm.
Meanwhile, Microsoft is attributing the extensive impact of the CrowdStrike outage to a regulatory decision made by the European Commission in the early 2000s. Following antitrust concerns, Microsoft agreed to give third-party security software developers the same level of access to the Windows operating system that Microsoft itself had. This decision meant that CrowdStrike’s Falcon system, with deep access to the Windows kernel, could cause widespread issues when a faulty update was released. In contrast, Apple's more restricted, closed ecosystem prevented such a scenario on their devices. We guess MS have a right to be a tad upset.
领英推荐
?? Join the Future of LegalTech with LTIC!
Stay ahead in the evolving legal landscape with the Legal Technology & Innovation Certificate (LTIC). Our next cohort starts on 11/24. Gain hands-on experience with cutting-edge technologies like chatbots and smart contracts, learn from global LegalTech experts, and transform your practice into a business enabler.
Secure your spot with a 10% deposit and interest-free payment options. Don't miss this opportunity to lead in LegalTech!
?? Enroll Now!
#LegalTech #Innovation #LTIC #FutureOfLaw
References:
Amanda O'Brien & Samson Amore, "CrowdStrike Outage Yields Mixed Impacts on Big Law," The American Lawyer, July 19, 2024.