Dancer Tunes: The Tech Stack

Dancer Tunes: The Tech Stack

When I started building DancerTunes, a crowdsourced music discovery tool for dancers and DJs, I knew the tech stack had to be:

? Scalable – Able to grow as more users contribute curated dance tracks

? Efficient – Handling real-time song classifications and API requests

? Flexible – Supporting integrations with Spotify, Apple Music, Tidal, etc.

? User-Friendly – A clean and responsive UI that works across devices

After weighing my options, I settled on React, TypeScript, Node.js, GraphQL, Prisma, PostgreSQL, and Tailwind CSS, all deployed in a cloud-native architecture. Here’s why:

Frontend: React + TypeScript + Tailwind CSS

?? Component-based UI – Reusable and scalable design

?? Type safety with TypeScript – Reduces runtime errors, improves maintainability

?? Tailwind CSS for styling –?

? Utility-first approach makes UI development faster and more consistent

??? Responsive design baked in—perfect for both mobile and desktop ???

? Minimal CSS bloat—styles are generated dynamically

?? Great state management – React hooks and context make managing UI state straightforward

?? Future flexibility – Easy to extend to React Native if I build a mobile app

Backend: Node.js + TypeScript + GraphQL

?? GraphQL instead of REST – ????

? Efficient queries – Clients get exactly what they need, reducing over-fetching

???? Schema flexibility – Easier to evolve APIs without breaking clients ????

? Strongly typed API – Ensures consistency across frontend and backend

?? Node.js for its async nature – Handles API calls to streaming services efficiently

?? TypeScript for type safety – Reduces runtime errors and improves DX

Database Layer: Prisma + PostgreSQL

?? PostgreSQL – Chosen for its reliability, scalability, and strong support for relational data

?? Prisma as the ORM – ???

? ? Type-safe queries – Eliminates SQL injection risks and improves DX ????

? Migrations are easy – Schema changes are version-controlled and structured ????

? Optimized for GraphQL – Works seamlessly with a strongly typed backend

PostgreSQL was the natural choice because:

?? Tracks, users, playlists, and dance styles all have relational data that benefit from SQL’s structure and indexing.

?? Full-text search capabilities allow users to efficiently find and filter songs.

?? Performance at scale – Handles large datasets of curated music efficiently.

Cloud-Native Approach

?? Serverless functions for scaling API requests

?? Containerized deployment for flexibility across cloud providers

?? Managed PostgreSQL hosting for better uptime and automated backups

Challenges & Trade-offs

? Managing API rate limits – Streaming services impose restrictions on external calls

? Real-time updates vs. caching – Balancing freshness of data with performance

? Handling dance-specific metadata – Ensuring the curation process remains structured

? Styling consistency – Tailwind speeds up development, but enforcing design standards still requires discipline

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Jerry Sewell的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了