No Damage = No Case

No Damage = No Case

Broker Different Than Agent and Insurer

Posted on May 17, 2023 by Barry Zalma

See the full video at https://rumble.com/v2nff6i-no-damage-no-case.html and at https://youtu.be/iRy3RfPkJMQ

Knockerball MidMo, LLC (“Knockerball”) appealed from the judgment of the trial court granting McGowan & Company, Inc.’s (“McGowan”) motion for summary judgment on Knockerball’s claims for negligence and breach of fiduciary duties.

In Knockerball Midmo, LLC v. Mcgowan & Company, Inc. d/b/a McGowan Excess & Casualty, No. WD85458, Court of Appeals of Missouri, Western District, Fourth Division (May 9, 2023) the Court of Appeals resolved?the dispute.

BACKGROUND

McGowan, in its capacity as Knockerball’s insurance broker, and Sportsinsurance, in its capacity as managing general agent for Liability Insurer, assisted in procuring general liability insurance coverage for Knockerball in the amount of $1 million and the liability insurance policy covered the time period when Hart was severely injured on Knockerball’s premises.

Hart sued Knockerball for personal injuries (the “Underlying Suit”). Knockerball was served?and promptly notified McGowan of the Underlying Suit and provided a copy of the petition to McGowan. McGowan’s representative assured Knockerball’s managing member that McGowan would “handle it.”

However, through a variety of missteps by McGowan, Sportsinsurance, and Liability Insurer, no responsive pleading was timely filed on behalf of Knockerball and an order of interlocutory default against Knockerball was entered in the Underlying Suit on March 31, 2017.

Knockerball then entered into an agreement with Hart that contained the following provisions: Hart and Knockerball and for the consideration of TEN DOLLARS ($10.00) provided to Hart this day by Knockerball agreed to settle and assign rights against broker and insurer.

Thereafter, a bench trial on damages was held on July 11, 2017, at which Knockerball did not cross-examine witnesses or object to the evidence Hart’s attorney offered. On July 13, 2017, the court in the Underlying Suit entered a Final Judgment for Hart against Knockerball in the amount of $44,631,268.99 with interest at the rate of 6.16 percent.

It is undisputed that Knockerball did not incur any attorney’s fees for the defense of the Underlying Suit. And Hart is prohibited from attempting to collect any portion of the judgment in the Underlying Suit against Knockerball or Knockerball’s managing member.

The trial court found that it was undisputed that not only was Knockerball protected from liability on Hart’s claims but it also stood to collect in excess of $1 million as a result of the resolution of actual coverage claims, therefore it was difficult to see how Knockerball has been damaged and that such damage was proximately caused by McGowan’s conduct.

ANALYSIS

This case is not a “bad faith refusal to settle” case against a liability insurer or that insurer’s general agent. Simply put, there is a difference between an insurance broker such as McGowan and a general agent for the insurer (i.e., Sportsinsurance). While an agent represents the insurer, an insurance broker, unless otherwise authorized and provided, represents the insured and, unless otherwise shown by the evidence, is to be regarded as the agent of the insured. Knockerball’s claims against McGowan are for negligence.

The circuit court granted summary judgment in favor of the insurance broker, and the insured appealed, asserting that the trial court erred in concluding that the insured sustained no damages resulting from the insurance broker’s failure to procure adequate insurance coverage.

The judgment in the Underlying Suit was entered after Hart agreed that he would not levy execution by garnishment or otherwise provided by law, or otherwise collect or attempt to collect on any property, asset, or right of Knockerball for any portion of the Judgment entered against it in the Underlying Suit. Instead of Knockerball suffering damages from a $44 million default judgment in the Underlying Suit, it actually received $1.25 million from Liability Insurer’s settlement of Hart’s claims against Liability Insurer.

Knockerball actually profited from its own business premises negligence due to the corresponding settlement of Hart’s coverage and bad faith claims.

The Court of Appeals concluded that Knockerball has not been damaged as a result of the judgment entered against it in the Underlying Suit. Knockerball has not established that it sustained pecuniary damage as a result of McGowan’s alleged negligence and breach of fiduciary duties to Knockerball as Knockerball’s insurance broker.

Without damages, the trial court’s summary judgment ruling is not erroneous, and Knockerball’s appeal is without merit.

ZALMA OPINION

No alt text provided for this image

Although the broker was negligent in not immediately forwarding the notice of the suit to the insurer the resulting actions of the insured and the plaintiff to allow action against the insurer and the brokers resulted in Knockerball incurring no damages and, in fact, profiting from the situation. This part of the case was, in my opinion, a waste of judicial time since an inability to prove any damage defeats the purpose of litigation.

(c) 2023 Barry Zalma & ClaimSchool, Inc.

Subscribe and receive videos limited to subscribers of Excellence in Claims Handling at locals.com https://zalmaoninsurance.locals.com/subscribe.

Consider subscribing to my publications at substack at https://barryzalma.substack.com/publish/post/107007808

Go to Newsbreak.com? https://www.newsbreak.com/@c/1653419?s=01

Barry Zalma, Esq., CFE, is available at https://www.zalma.com and [email protected]

Follow me on LinkedIn: www.dhirubhai.net/comm/mynetwork/discovery-see-all?usecase=PEOPLE_FOLLOWS&followMember=barry-zalma-esq-cfe-a6b5257

No alt text provided for this image

Write to Mr. Zalma at [email protected]; https://www.zalma.com; https://zalma.com/blog; daily articles are published at https://zalma.substack.com. Go to the podcast Zalma On Insurance at https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/barry-zalma/support; Follow Mr. Zalma on Twitter at https://twitter.com/bzalma; Go to Barry Zalma videos at Rumble.com at https://rumble.com/c/c-262921; Go to Barry Zalma on YouTube- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCysiZklEtxZsSF9DfC0Expg; https://creators.newsbreak.com/home/content/post; Go to the Insurance Claims Library – https://zalma.com/blog/insurance-claims-library.

Harry F. Billings Jr.

Pyroforensics.com at Forensicevent

1 年

HOW TRUE THIS H BILLINGS P. I . MOTOR VEHICLE / FRAUD

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Barry Zalma, Esq., CFE的更多文章

  • Unsubstantiated Legal Conclusion Defeats Bad Faith Claim

    Unsubstantiated Legal Conclusion Defeats Bad Faith Claim

    When Common Law Bad Faith Claim Fails so Does Statutory Bad Faith Claims Post 5023 Posted on March 18, 2025 by Barry…

  • Zalma’s Insurance Fraud Letter – March 15, 2025

    Zalma’s Insurance Fraud Letter – March 15, 2025

    ZIFL Volume 29, Issue 6 The Ides of March Produces the Newest Issue of Zalma’s Insurance Fraud Letter The Source for…

  • “The Passover Seder For Americans”

    “The Passover Seder For Americans”

    Posted on March 14, 2025 by Barry Zalma For American Jews Who Can’t Read Hebrew & For Christians Who Want to Understand…

  • Insurance Appraisal is an Arbitration in Rhode Island

    Insurance Appraisal is an Arbitration in Rhode Island

    Appraisal Award Must be Rejected if Appraiser Has a Financial Interest in a Potential Award Post 5019 Posted on March…

    4 条评论
  • Lies on Application Voids Policy

    Lies on Application Voids Policy

    An Insurance Company Can Avoid Liability On The Policy By Showing That The Insured Misrepresented A Material Fact Post…

    1 条评论
  • Duties and Liabilities of Insurance Brokers

    Duties and Liabilities of Insurance Brokers

    Excellence in Claims Handling This blog post is just a taste of the full article that is only available to subscribers…

  • CGL Policy not a Course of Construction Policy

    CGL Policy not a Course of Construction Policy

    Damage Before Project is Complete Excluded by CGL Post 5013 Posted on March 12, 2025 by Barry Zalma Consolidated…

    1 条评论
  • Sixteen Years in Prison for Stalking

    Sixteen Years in Prison for Stalking

    Accusing Victim of Insurance Fraud Was Not a Defense to Stalking and Violence Post 5012 Posted on March 11, 2025 by…

  • Policy Enforced as Issued

    Policy Enforced as Issued

    No Duty of Care Exists in Arms-Length Negotiations Between Insurer and Insured Post 5011 Posted on March 10, 2025 by…

    2 条评论
  • Fraud is Epidemic

    Fraud is Epidemic

    Guilty Verdict of Mortgage Fraud Scheme Stands Post 5010 Posted on March 7, 2025 by Barry Zalma See the full video at…

    2 条评论

社区洞察