Daily Tax & Corporate Law Digest
Powered by Taxmann,.com

Daily Tax & Corporate Law Digest

Dear Reader,

Today’s newsletter analytically summarizes today’s top Tax & Corporate Law stories reported at?taxmann.com, in a unique section-wise format.

INCOME TAX

SECTION 2(22) OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT, 1961 - DEEMED DIVIDEND

Loans and advances: Section 2(22)(e) would not be applicable where the assessee availed unsecured loan from its group company which was paid back with interest in the same year - Principal Commissioner of Income-tax v. Govind Promoters (P.) Ltd. - [2022] 142 taxmann.com 244 (Calcutta)

Read More

SECTION 9 OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT, 1961 - INCOME - DEEMED TO ACCRUE OR ARISE IN INDIA

Royalties/Fee for technical services - Commission: Where the assessee-company engaged, a foreign entity (SPA) of Italy under the agreement as export commission agent as the said agent was not providing any technical services to the assessee and was acting only as a commission agent and procuring orders for the assessee and reporting assessee for any infringement of rights, no part of its income could be said to accrue or arise in India - ACIT v. Graziano Transmission India (P.) Ltd. - [2022] 140 taxmann.com 475 (Delhi - Trib.)

Read More

SECTION 12AA OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT, 1961 - CHARITABLE OR RELIGIOUS TRUST - REGISTRATION PROCEDURE

Grant of registration: Where assessee-trust claimed exemption under section 11 and AO rejected same on the ground that assessee-trust was not registered under section 12A, however subsequent to filing tax appeals Commissioner (Exemption) permitted assessee-trust registration under section 12AA with effect from 7-7-2004 and copy of same was produced, the matter was to be remanded to AO to consider a certificate of exemption granted by Commissioner (Exemption) - Commissioner of Income-tax v. Soorya Educational Trust - [2022] 142 taxmann.com 232 (Madras)

Read More

SECTION 40A(3) OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT, 1961 - BUSINESS DISALLOWANCE - CASH PAYMENTS EXCEEDING PRESCRIBED LIMITS

Illustrations: Where assessee made payments of Rs. 19.78 lacs in cash towards printing charges to various parties and submitted that no payment was made to any single party in cash above Rs. 20,000 since it was unclear whether separate invoices had been raised by various parties and accordingly separate payments disbursed to them were within the permissible limit of Rs. 20,000, the matter was to be restored to file of Assessing Officer for verification on this point - Income-tax Officer v. Rahul Bharatbhushan Jain - [2022] 140 taxmann.com 478 (Ahmedabad - Trib.)

Read More

Where assessee had not brought on record any submission in the original assessment proceeding to justify its payments in cash exceeding specified limit under section 40(A)(3), reopening of assessment could not be averred as the change of opinion - Income-tax Officer v. Rahul Bharatbhushan Jain - [2022] 140 taxmann.com 478 (Ahmedabad - Trib.)

Read More

SECTION 48 OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT, 1961 - CAPITAL GAIN - COMPUTATION OF

General: Where reassessment was initiated in case of assessee on the ground that assessee claimed excess cost of acquisition of property while computing capital gain/loss on sale of property and, thus, income had escaped assessment and thereafter reassessment order was passed, since the subject matter in issue involved factual matrix which could not be decided by writ court, the assessee was to be directed to file a statutory appeal before appellate authority - East Coast Consultants (India) Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax - [2022] 142 taxmann.com 245 (Madras)

Read More

SECTION 92 OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT, 1961 - TRANSFER PRICING - GENERAL

Scope of provision: Section 92 is not an independent charging section to bring in a new head of income or to charge tax on income which is otherwise not chargeable under Act, and thus, where no income has accrued to or received by assessee under section 5, no notional income can be brought to tax under section 92 - Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax v. Shilpa Shetty - [2022] 142 taxmann.com 235 (Mumbai - Trib.)

Read More

SECTION 92A OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT, 1961 - TRANSFER PRICING - MEANING OF ASSOCIATED ENTERPRISE

Applicability of: Section 92A(2)(j) deems two enterprises as AE if one enterprise is controlled by an individual and another enterprise is controlled by such individual or his relatives and without satisfying a second limb, i.e., individual or his relative controlled by other enterprise, provisions of section 92A(2)(j) cannot be applied - Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax v. Shilpa Shetty - [2022] 142 taxmann.com 235 (Mumbai - Trib.)

Read More

SECTION 92B OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT, 1961 - TRANSFER PRICING - INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTIONS, MEANING OF

AMP expenses: Where pursuant to share purchase agreement (SPA) entered into by husband of the assessee with Mauritius company to buy shares of said company, assessee rendered brand ambassadorship services to JIPL, 100 per cent subsidiary of Mauritius company, without any consideration, since parties to SPA was not an AE of assessee nor JIPL entered into a prior agreement with AE of the assessee, Section 92B(2) could not be applied to hold that transaction between JIPL and assessee was international transaction - Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax v. Shilpa Shetty - [2022] 142 taxmann.com 235 (Mumbai - Trib.)

Read More

SECTION 92BA OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT, 1961 - TRANSFER PRICING - SPECIFIED DOMESTIC TRANSACTION

Scope of provisions: Where threshold monetary limit of Rs. 5 crore was not available to Assessing Officer to characterize transactions with AE as SDT to enable him to make a reference to TPO, order of TPO under section 92CA(3) was non-est and consequently, the extension of time under an erstwhile provision of section 153 for passing assessment order based on such non-est order from TPO was not available to Assessing Officer - Garg Acrylics Ltd. v. Additional Commissioner of Income-tax - [2022] 140 taxmann.com 477 (Delhi - Trib.)

Read More

SECTION 92C OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT, 1961 - TRANSFER PRICING - COMPUTATION OF ARM'S LENGTH PRICE

Adjustments - Entity level v. transaction level: TPO should not resort to entity level TNMM for purpose of benchmarking of international transaction of assessee providing investment advisory services to AEs rather he should confine himself only to international transactions carried out with AEs - HSBC Asset Management (India) (P.) Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax - [2022] 140 taxmann.com 476 (Mumbai - Trib.)

Read More

Adjustments - Benefit for transaction/allowability of expenditure: TPO is duty bound to determine ALP of an international transaction only by following any of five prescribed methods provided in rule 10B and not otherwise; where the assessee had availed services and derived benefits therefrom by incurring cost paid to AE on basis of cost allocation depending on actual usage without any mark-up thereon, no transfer pricing adjustment was permitted on ad hoc basis - HSBC Asset Management (India) (P.) Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax - [2022] 140 taxmann.com 476 (Mumbai - Trib.)

Read More

SECTION 147 OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT, 1961 - INCOME ESCAPING ASSESSMENT - GENERAL

Where the Assessing Officer had independently applied his mind before initiating reassessment proceedings under section 147 on account of audit objections, such reopening was justified - Income-tax Officer v. Rahul Bharatbhushan Jain - [2022] 140 taxmann.com 478 (Ahmedabad - Trib.)

Read More

Where assessee neither sought the reason for reopening of the case on receipt of the notice initiating reassessment proceedings nor did he object to said reopening but rather sought for the reason of reopening assessment almost after two months and that too just ten days before reassessment was completed by Assessing Officer, assessee’s cross objection that Assessing Officer had erred by passing an order under section 143(3) without providing reasons recorded to him was to be dismissed - Income-tax Officer v. Rahul Bharatbhushan Jain - [2022] 140 taxmann.com 478 (Ahmedabad - Trib.)

Read More

SECTION 222 OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT, 1961 - COLLECTION AND RECOVERY OF TAX - CERTIFICATE PROCEEDINGS

Sale of attached property: Where assessee was in arrears of tax and property of assessee was auctioned by Income-tax Department and impugned auction notice clearly stated that terms and condition of proposed auction could be downloaded from the website of Income-tax Department or collected from the office of respondent Tax Recovery Officer, there was no irregularity in an auction conducted by Income-tax Department in not declaring reserved price in auction notice - IGGI Resorts International Ltd. v. Tax Recovery Officer - [2022] 140 taxmann.com 334 (Madras)

Read More

SECTION 268A OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT, 1961 - FILING OF APPEAL OR APPLICATION FOR REFERENCE BY INCOME-TAX AUTHORITY

Monetary effect: Where revenue reopened assessee’s case on basis of audit objection, its appeal would be covered by exception mentioned in Circular No. 3/2018, dated 11-7-2018 and, thus, appeal filed by revenue could not be dismissed due to low tax effect - Income-tax Officer v. Rahul Bharatbhushan Jain - [2022] 140 taxmann.com 478 (Ahmedabad - Trib.)

Read More

GOODS AND SERVICES TAX LAWS

NOTIFICATION NO. 81/2022-CUSTOMS (N.T.), DATED 23-09-2022

CBIC issues Courier Imports and Exports (Electronic Declaration and Processing) Second Amendment Regulations, 2022

Editorial Note: The CBIC has issued Courier Imports and Exports (Electronic Declaration and Processing) Second Amendment Regulations, 2022 to amend the Courier Imports and Exports (Electronic Declaration and Processing) Regulations, 2010. These amendments simplify a few entries of forms which require details of import or export through e-commerce platforms.

Read More

SECTION 2(26) OF THE CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICES TAX ACT, 2017 - COMMON PORTAL - DEFINITION OF

Improvement/upgrade of GSTN was found necessary since under CGST Act, service of notices and filing of replies are primarily to be done through GSTN portal through electronic means - Dauji Ispat (P.) Ltd. v. State of U.P. - [2022] 142 taxmann.com 470 (Allahabad)

Read More

SECTION 22 OF THE CENTRAL SALES TAX ACT, 1956 - POWERS OF THE AUTHORITY

Where on inter-State sale of the bus through a sales office in AP, CST was paid in the State of AP, CST so paid was to be transferred to State of Jharkhand where the manufacturer was located so as to adjust same with CST liability in Jharkhand - Tata Motors Ltd. v. Central Sales Tax Appellate Authority - [2022] 142 taxmann.com 463 (SC)

Read More

SECTION 62 OF THE CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICES TAX ACT, 2017 - ASSESSMENT - NON - FILERS OF RETURNS

Where order in Form GST DRC-07 as visible in GSTN Portal did not contain reasons, same was wholly defective and, hence was to be remitted back for fresh adjudication - Dauji Ispat (P.) Ltd. v. State of U.P. - [2022] 142 taxmann.com 470 (Allahabad)

Read More

SECTION 102 OF THE CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICES TAX ACT, 2017 - ADVANCE RULING - APPELLATE AUTHORITY - RECTIFICATION OF

Advance ruling passed without considering withdrawal application and rectification application was in violation of principles of natural justice; Matter was remanded for fresh consideration - DM Net Technologies, In re - [2022] 142 taxmann.com 467 (AAAR-GUJARAT)

Read More

SECTION 107 OF THE CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICES TAX ACT, 2017 - APPELLATE AUTHORITY - APPEALS TO

Limitation Act is not applicable to appeals filed under GST law; High Court dismisses challenge against appellate order rejecting appeal as time-barred - Nandan Steels and Power Ltd. v. State of Chhattisgarh - [2022] 142 taxmann.com 466 (Chhattisgarh)

Read More

SECTION 129 OF THE CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX ACT, 2017 - DETENTION, SEIZURE AND RELEASE OF GOODS AND CONVEYANCES IN TRANSIT

Demand of tax and imposition of penalty for mismatch in vehicle number, when goods were being stock transferred, were not sustainable and same were to be set aside and Authority was to be directed to hear the matter afresh - Symed Labs Ltd. v. Appellate Joint Commissioner ST - [2022] 142 taxmann.com 468 (Telangana)

Read More

FEMA BANKING AND INSURANCE LAWS

PUBLIC NOTICE NO. II/21022/23 (22)/2020-FCRA-III, DATED 23-09-2022

Govt. further extends the validity of FCRA registration certificates till 31.03.2023

Editorial Note: The Govt., in the public interest, has further extended the validity of FCRA registration certificates up to 31.03.2023 or till the date of disposal of the renewal application, whichever is earlier. The validity of certificates has also been extended for those entities whose validity was earlier extended till 30.09.2022. Also, validity of those FCRA entities whose 5 years validity period is expiring between 01.10.2022 to 31.03.2023 and who have applied for renewal stands extended to 31.03.2023.

Read More

PRESS RELEASE: 2022-2023/927, DATED 23-09-2022

Sovereign Gold Bonds 2016 (Series II) & 2016 – 17 (Series II) can be redeemed prematurely at Rs. 4952 per unit: RBI

Editorial Note: The due date of the fourth and third premature redemptions of SGB 2016 Series II & SGB 2016 - 17, Series II shall be September 29 & 30, 2022. The RBI has notified that the redemption price of SGB for fourth & third premature redemptions due on September 29 & 30, 2022 shall be Rs.4952/-per unit of SGB based on the simple average closing gold price of 999 purity of the week (Monday-Friday) preceding the date of redemption as published by the India Bullion and Jewellers Association Ltd (IBJA).

Read More

INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE

SECTION 7 OF THE INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 - CORPORATE INSOLVENCY RESOLUTION PROCESS - INITIATION BY FINANCIAL CREDITOR

CIRP proceedings u/s 7 can be initiated against both corporate co-borrowers but there can be no double recovery of same amount from both - Maitreya Doshi v. Anand Rathi Global Finance Ltd. - [2022] 142 taxmann.com 484 (SC)

Read More

SECTION 12A OF THE INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 - CORPORATE INSOLVENCY RESOLUTION PROCESS - WITHDRAWAL OF APPLICATION

Before CoC is constituted, the applicant is allowed to withdraw his admitted CIRP application without the consent of creditors - Ashok G. Rajani v. Beacon Trusteeship Ltd. - [2022] 142 taxmann.com 465 (SC)

Read More

SECTION 65 OF THE INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 - CORPORATE PERSON'S ADJUDICATING AUTHORITIES - FRAUDULENT OR MALICIOUS PROCEEDINGS

Where financial creditor bank approached multiple Courts just to harass borrowers and guarantor in time consuming and expensive litigation, such action of bank fell under category of forum shopping and, therefore, ex parte CIRP order passed by NCLT against corporate guarantor on application of said bank was to be set aside and matter was to be remanded back to decide matter afresh - Partha Paul v. Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. - [2022] 142 taxmann.com 237 (NCLAT- New Delhi)

Read More

SECTION 238 OF THE INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 - OVERRIDING EFFECT OF CODE

In view of section 238, steps taken under Code by Authority would have precedence over other authorities in parallel proceedings and provision of I&B Code should prevail in case of any conflict and, therefore application filed by applicant on ground that proceedings before DRT needed to be completed before distribution under IBC took place was misconceived - UCO Bank v. Oswal Spinning and Weaving Mills Ltd. - [2022] 142 taxmann.com 238 (NCLT-Chd.)

Read More

ACCOUNTS AND AUDIT

How to allocate the manpower cost during the project implementation phase?

Editorial Note: Ind AS 16 provides that costs of employee benefits arising directly from the construction or acquisition of the item of property, plant and equipment form part of the directly attributable costs. The manpower costs that are directly attributable to bringing the PPE to the location and condition necessary for it to be capable of operating in the manner intended by management, should be capitalised on the PPE.

Read More

That’s it from us for today! Stay Tuned for more updates from?Taxmann.com

Taxmann's Classes | [Virtual] Workshop on Common Findings of NFRA & QRB and Auditors’ Responsibilities

#TaxmannClasses #NFRA #QRB

Register Now for Taxmann's Classes | [Virtual] Workshop on Common Findings of NFRA & QRB and Auditors’ Responsibilities

1 Day | 1 Session | 1 Speaker | 180 Minutes

?? 1st October 2022 (Saturday) | ?? 11:00 AM – 02:00 PM (IST)

Fees: ? 795/- + GST @18% Extra

Register Now (Limited Slots Available): https://taxmann.social/0eoD1

Faculty:

? Pranav Jain – CA

Pranav Jain is a Fellow Member of ICAI in practice with 22 years of experience in Audit & Assurance. He is leading the audit & assurance division of BGJC & Associates LLP, Chartered Accountants, a firm with offices in Delhi, Mumbai, and Udaipur. He has authored a book, ‘Audit of Financial Statements’, published by Taxmann.

Key Learnings:

?? Generally Observed Lapses During Audit

?? Observations of the Regulators

?? Checklist for Financial Report/Audit Procedures

?? Guidance for Auditors

Benefits to Participants:

?? Get Replies to your Queries

?? Complimentary access to the Accounting Module Module of Taxmann.com | Practice for one month

?? Certificate of Participation

?? Relevant For:

? Audit Partners

? CAs engaged in Audit of Financial Statements

? Audit Assistants

? CFOs

? Members of Audit Committee

#TaxmannUpdates #Auditor #FinancialStatements #Audit #AuditReport #CARO #IndAS

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Taxmann的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了