DA Newsflash (GST) : Supreme Court Upholds HC Order, Rejects GST Demand Over GSTR-3B and 2A Mismatch

Hope you are well and safe!

In a significant legal development, the Supreme Court of India, in the case of Suncraft Energy Pvt. Ltd., has dismissed the department's Special Leave Petition (SLP) against the judgment of the Calcutta High Court.

The essence of the decision lies in the affirmation that the Input Tax Credit (ITC) of a purchasing dealer cannot be denied by the department solely on the basis of non-remittance of tax by the supplying dealer, unless there are exceptional circumstances. These circumstances may include scenarios where the supplying dealer is untraceable or where tax collection from them becomes practically impossible. In the absence of such exceptional circumstances, the department is barred from withholding ITC from the purchasing dealer.

Key Highlights:

1. Background: The case revolved around a discrepancy between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A, wherein the department sought to demand ITC from the service recipient due to this mismatch.
2. Calcutta HC Judgment: The Calcutta High Court had quashed the demand of ITC against the service recipient, emphasizing the necessity for the department to conduct thorough investigations into the supplying dealer whose invoices were not reflected in GSTR-2A.
3. Supreme Court Verdict: The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Calcutta High Court, thereby affirming the principle that ITC cannot be withheld from the purchasing dealer without sufficient evidence of exceptional circumstances such as the untraceability of the supplying dealer or practical impossibility in tax collection.
4. SLP Dismissal: The Supreme Court's dismissal of the Revenue's SLP against the Calcutta HC decision further solidifies the precedence set by the HC judgment.

Implications and Conclusion:

The dismissal of the SLP underscores the importance of due diligence and proper investigation by tax authorities before demanding ITC from service recipients based on discrepancies in GST filings. It establishes a safeguard for purchasing dealers against arbitrary denial of ITC, thereby promoting fairness and transparency in GST administration.

This ruling sets a significant precedent in the interpretation and application of GST laws, emphasizing the need for a balanced approach that upholds the rights of both taxpayers and tax authorities. As businesses navigate the complex landscape of GST compliance, this decision provides clarity and reassurance regarding the protection of their rights under the law.

Our dedicated team of experts is fully committed to delving deep into your business operations challenges, ensuring your continued compliance with all relevant tax and regulatory obligations.

We handle all your recurring compliance needs while offering tailored solutions for litigation management and tax structuring.

Should you have any inquiries related to indirect taxes or require our assistance, please don't hesitate to get in touch with us via email at [email protected], or simply visit our website at www.dardaadvisors.com.