Cutting Through The Noise On LinkedIn
Bruce Johnston
Sales and Marketing Consultant. LinkedIn Specialist: LinkedIn Training, LinkedIn Consulting and LinkedIn Coaching
There are three big problems with content that I see on LinkedIn these days, and they are tied together.
1) Pods. For those of you not in the know, pods are groups of people that actively support each other’s content, by promising to like or comment on each other’s posts as soon as they come out. As this is artificially gaming the system, LinkedIn does not like it, and says that it breaks the user agreement.?
One of the problems for Pod participants is that it is so time consuming. Say you are in a Pod with Fred. He posts and you are expected to drop everything, come in and comment on his post, so you do so. You get back to work afterwards, and immediately get a notification that Pam just posted and you need to go comment on Pam’s post.?
2) Automation. The Pod idea has been a boon to the automation crowd. Now you can just sign up (for a fee) to be in a Pod and fresh comments, likes, or re-posts from real people are automatically delivered to your post after you publish. Problem solved. Sorta. The problem then becomes, well, what about the crappy quality of those canned comments? Easily fixed, because now we have:
3) Artificial Intelligence. Artificial Intelligence has been another boon to the Pod crowd. AI can look at your post and come up with a more relevant comment. The key word in that last sentence is “more” as a lot of the comments are awful. For example they consist of repeating chunks of the post and agreeing with it, adding no value whatsoever. Or, because they're just bots, the comments use awkward and out of place words. You know when someone is using AI for a comment when you post something innocuous and a commenter talks about the value you brought in this post being part of your legacy. My what?
So this evil combination of AI, Pods and Automation are taking over LinkedIn. They’re everywhere. And LinkedIn can’t seem to keep up. They have encouraged AI and they don’t seem to have the systems to properly detect its presence. There are times I wonder if they have just thrown in the towel and are ignoring it, at least for now.?
The ultimate expression of this is starting to show itself in Collaborative Articles: LinkedIn gets its AI to come up with a topic, then the AI selects people who might want to participate. But the participants are more and more using AI to respond, so we get these odd, stilted “conversations”. If your AI asks me a question and I get my AI to respond, did we have a conversation??
The bottom line is that if you have the money, you can have the superficial appearance of success on LinkedIn. Hundreds of thousands of followers…that were purchased. Participant badges from LinkedIn, that their AI earned. Hundreds of reposts, thousands of comments, a barrage of Likes…
So what can we do about it??
Stop judging anyone on LinkedIn based on quantity. Of anything: comments, connections, impressions, followers, reposts. If it can be counted on LinkedIn, it is being gamed on LinkedIn.?
Instead judge people based on the quality of their actions.?
The bots and automated programs have the ability to make anyone look good on a superficial level. Our job is to see past that and find the real people we want to engage with on LinkedIn.
Today’s newsletter is a shorter version of my email newsletter. I usually publish one of the four articles from my email Newsletter on LinkedIn, so next week’s LinkedIn Newsletter will be:?
Next week’s email newsletter will include articles on?
If you are interested in this much deeper weekly dive into Using LinkedIn Effectively, here’s a link to the signup page: https://www.practicalsmm.com/free-email-newsletter/
The obligatory disclaimer: I do not work for or have any business association with LinkedIn other than being a user who pays for a Sales Navigator subscription.?
President @ HOPEWELL Companies | Engineering and Manufacturing Services | Manufacturing Matchmaker
1 个月The declining reach of LinkedIn. Could junk content be a contributing factor? I come to LinkedIn to 'connect for business' with 'business connections'. But it seems like LinkedIn has been taken over by fluff posts. I actually had to do a double check today to confirm I was on LinkedIn and not Facebook. ?? Could it be an increasing number of LinkedIn members are choosing to stay away from the feed (which diminishes the reach of any/all posts)? I'd love to hear your thoughts Bruce.
Personal Branding Coach | LinkedIn Training | Speaker | Corporate Presentations | Virtual & In-Person Sessions | Brandstorming? | Mentor | Avid Mountain Hiker | Known as "The LinkedIn Guy"
1 个月AI-generated comments on posts are a big problem right now, Bruce. They are so "formula" and easy to detect. Who do they think they're fooling??
Cofundador en Yala AI | Impulsando la Excelencia en Ventas y el Crecimiento Sostenible | Empoderando Líderes y Equipos con Innovación en IA
1 个月Your call to focus on quality over quantity is spot-on - we must prioritize genuine value in our professional networking. To address this, LinkedIn could implement an AI analysis tool that estimates the probability of AI-generated comments, promoting transparency. It is much harder to control the pods. I have seen a person who has over 50 top voice badges!
Real Estate Investor | Jeremy of All Trades, Master of Pun
1 个月Excellent writeup Bruce Johnston. You see AI influenced content all over Linkedin. It's a 'problem' that will only increase over time as enforcement is proving elusive. Unfortunately, you may feel left out if you don't use AI. Interesting times ahead.
Creator & Host (of the Curious AF Show).
1 个月It really comes down to the company that you keep. If you appreciate people who are additive to your LinkedIn experience in some way (they make you think/learn/feel) and you gain value/something by interacting with them, then you are likely to want to continue with that nexus. Pods, automation and substandard AI are all weak ties, they don’t bind people together. They repel people who can think for themselves. I don’t think LinkedIn has thrown in the towel. I think they fail to see a problem. If quality was a goal, we wouldn’t have vanity stats, fake awards and cringe content going viral. Let’s face it, the only people who truly care about quality on this platform are the folks who consistently strive to write stuff that helps/entertains and build community. A N D Y ??