Cutting Back on Community Reinvestment

Cutting Back on Community Reinvestment

Bloomberg Law quoted me in Banks Look to Narrow Exams Under Community Reinvestment Act. It opens,

Banks see an opening to limit the types of violations that could lead to a Community Reinvestment Act downgrade as federal regulators begin rewriting rules under the 1977 law.

Banks say regulators have improperly used consumer fair lending and other violations involving credit cards or other financial products to evaluate compliance with the law meant to increase lending and investment to lower-income communities.

“When a bank violates a consumer protection law, there is no shortage of enforcement agencies and legal regimes available to seek redress and punishment. Adding the CRA to that long list thus has little marginal benefit, and risks diluting and undermining the CRA’s core purpose of promoting community reinvestment,” the Bank Policy Institute, a leading bank lobbying group, said in a Nov. 19 comment letter to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.

The OCC set the stage for a CRA rewrite in August by releasing an advanced notice of proposed rulemaking. The Federal Reserve and Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. have signaled a desire to sign on to a joint proposal.

With that momentum building, banks are taking their shot to limit the types of enforcement actions included in CRA reviews. They want CRA reviews to focus on mortgages, small business and other community development investments.

The question of how non-CRA-related violations apply to banks’ community lending reviews is not merely a theoretical exercise.

Wells Fargo & Co. saw its CRA grade downgraded two levels to “needs to improve”in March 2017 following the revelation of the fake accounts it generated for consumers. Several states and municipalities cut off business with the bank in response.

CRA exam cycles run three years for large national banks and can run longer for smaller banks that perform well. Banks receive one of four grades—outstanding, satisfactory, needs to improve or substantial noncompliance—and a poor grade can restrict their merger and branch expansion plans.

OCC, Treasury Leading Push

The Trump administration, led by Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin and Comptroller of the Currency Joseph Otting, has been pushing for the latest CRA revision.

Both of those officials ran into CRA trouble when they tried to sell OneWest Bank to CIT Group Inc. Mnuchin was OneWest’s chairman and Otting its chief executive.

The Treasury Department released a report on “modernizing the CRA” in April. Included in that report is a call to not allow fair lending enforcement investigations from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and other regulators to slow down CRA reviews.

Otting went farther, issuing a bulletin on Aug. 15 highlighting that his agency’s examiners will no longer take into account non-CRA lending violations when assessing a bank’s CRA compliance.

The FDIC and the Fed have not yet followed suit. But banks want the three agencies to set a common policy on dealing with non-CRA related enforcement actions in their community lending reviews.

“Regulators should develop consistent policies clarifying that CRA will not be used as a general enforcement tool,” the American Bankers Association said in a Nov. 15 comment letter.

There is some merit to the idea, according to David Reiss, a professor at Brooklyn Law School and the research director at the Center for Urban Business Entrepreneurship.

“It’s delinking fair lending concerns, which are regulated elsewhere, from CRA concerns. From an industry perspective that may make a lot of sense,” he said in a Nov. 30 phone interview.

* * *

The proposal, taken in a vacuum, may be reasonable. But in the context of broader attempts to weaken the CRA, it should be viewed more skeptically.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

David Reiss的更多文章

  • Housing Finance Reform Endgame?

    Housing Finance Reform Endgame?

    The Hill published my column, There is Hope of Housing Finance Reform That Works for Americans. It opens, The Trump…

  • Does Historic Preservation Limit Affordable Housing?

    Does Historic Preservation Limit Affordable Housing?

    I answer that it can in CQ Researcher’s Historic Preservation: Can The Past Escape The Wrecking Ball? Many people fail…

  • In Spite of It All

    In Spite of It All

    Realtor.com quoted me in 3 Most Mind-Boggling Housing Turf Wars Ever—and What They Can Teach Us All.

    1 条评论
  • Unfair, Unlawful and Abusive

    Unfair, Unlawful and Abusive

    I signed on to a Memorandum in Support of a bill to amend New York's consumer protection law to make it consistent with…

  • Financing The American Dream

    Financing The American Dream

    I published Financing The American Dream in the May/June 2019 issue of the ABA’s Probate & Property magazine. it opens,…

  • Skyscraper’s Future up in The Air

    Skyscraper’s Future up in The Air

    The New York Law Journal quoted me in Upper West Side Skyscraper’s Future Uncertain After NY State Court Ruling. The…

  • Luxury Rental Turned Into College Dorm

    Luxury Rental Turned Into College Dorm

    Realtor.com quoted me in ‘Help! My Luxury Rental Was Turned Into a College Dorm’.

    1 条评论
  • Housing Policy, Going Forward

    Housing Policy, Going Forward

    The Hill published a column of mine, The Next Two Years of Federal Housing Policy Could Be Positive under Mark…

  • Protecting Small Businesses

    Protecting Small Businesses

    Students in my Community Development Clinic and I have a column in the New York Law Journal, Small Business Jobs…

  • The Hunger Games: Amazon Edition

    The Hunger Games: Amazon Edition

    The New York Law Journal published commentary of mine, The Hunger Games: Amazon Edition. It opens, Last week Amazon…

    1 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了