Culture and the Real Impact of Change Agents - Part 1
At the Berlin Change Days 2018

Culture and the Real Impact of Change Agents - Part 1

These days, more and more professionals get hired to “change” things. Close to 10% of my direct network on LinkedIn now bears a professional title that includes words such as “Change”, “Transformation” or “Innovation” – from very few before. Part of this is definitely necessity, part is fad (or wishful thinking?) I sometimes shake my head in disbelief at spotting some known individuals, whom I’ve never seen taking any risk nor changing anything, holding a “transformation” job. What in the world…?! Fortunately, many brilliant change agents out there carry out real innovation even in the absence of a professional label or recognition.

I often think about impact. What difference do we, “transformation” or “innovation” people, really make? How do we know? How can we make a bigger one?

From Boston to Berlin

When Holger Nauheimer invited me to keynote the Berlin Change Days 2018 about “Courage and Corporate Activism, it seemed like a matter of evidence. By late 2017, when our initial discussion happened, I worked for a big corporate, happy to make an impact through repeated acts of change and innovative people engagement. It felt good to be a change agent and I was looking forward to sharing some cool stories. My keynote would address the need for more courage and more corporate change, if possible through active mobilization – or corporate activism.

But then, by the time of the event a year after, I was (literally) in a different place. I had changed country, moved back to Europe with my family. I’d changed job. I’d left my employer. I’d created my own business, after 27 years as an employee. All these changes, and conversations with ex-colleagues, called for reflection about my impact and legacy. Had I been successful? Had I not? Did courage and corporate activism really work? Could these reflections help other change agents do an even better job at change?

Does “Change” Work?

What a weird question, you may ask. Does “Change” Work? Well of course! Why would so many change professionals be hired if it didn’t… On the one hand, results can be obvious. The Quality transformation story I already shared here and here resulted in mind-blowing improvements of quality (basically all positive indicators going up, all negative ones going down), better supply, huge savings, higher people engagement and so on. A real case study for culture change.

Also, those who have been actively involved in change movements have learnt new ways of working together – as it was the case in the Quality story, or in the diversity movement a few years earlier. People do not unlearn or at least not completely. When they experience an expanded zone of freedom, another way to connect across hierarchies / geographies / functions, to interact with others, to display leadership… it’s hard to forget. They now know it is possible to do things differently and, very often, they’ve experienced change in themselves too.

Really?

But, does it really work? Friend and former colleague Mohammed, a true change maker, says: “Unless we address the root of the system, unless we really influence shareholders and how organizations make their decisions – but decisions are taken along short-term financial objectives because of the capitalist system we live in – unless we change that, neither courage nor corporate activism will make any difference. They just can’t”.

Mohammed has just become a father. I asked him the meaning of Elyassa, the name he gave his newborn son. “Once” he replied “there was a prophet named Elyassa, who fought evil. He fought the bad king to put a good one in his place; but when the prophet died, the good king became a despot. I gave this name to my son to remind him that we must do change, but it’s a constant work. It’s never finished.”

Fake Change

What I have seen is that the old system perpetuates itself through many, many ways, including through the hire of new blood. You would think that the young generations will help change that… but they’re as susceptible to power and rewards, just like the old ones. Change is not a matter of age.

The system is able to mimic the work of change agents by espousing its surface only, and leaving its substance aside. Conformity agents – most of the time acting in good faith – recycle the words. They use a similar vocabulary as change agents: “purpose”, “movement”, “activism” … and yet they’re just good soldiers. They use our words, rendered meaningless. I was once asked to support an upcoming corporate initiative with advice. Then the initiative got launched, trying hard to look like a movement of volunteers, but actually top-down, controlled, aiming at changing others, deeply traditional. It’d applied a set of “recipes” but not an intent. Change was no longer an authentic belief but a set of manipulative tools.

“They” are “Us”

I even found – even more disturbing – that sometimes *we* are the ones that enable the system to maintain itself; we are ourselves barriers to change. We don’t always realize. A young colleague once shared with me his frustration at our mother company, which was preventing change because they were “so controlling”. I couldn’t believe my ears. He himself was of the most controlling type of persons! How come he couldn’t see that in himself?

At another time, a friend made me realize that, among the network of volunteers I had created, I had actually duplicated the hierarchy I was trying to transform. I was acting as the boss… without the actual title, but operating just the same. I was myself reproducing the system! Thanks to this feedback, I tried to change; but how many times have I not been told and have I not changed? More and more, I am disturbed by the “they” word. Or, “the system”. I keep using them though, here and there, for convenience. But I’m aware it’s a misleading shortcut. Sometimes “they” are “us”, and we’re always part of the system.


Read part 2 here, where I take a look at agency (or its limits) and the consequences of fighting the status quo. There's more than "success" or "failure". Read part 3 (and final) here, with the big reveal! What I believe is the "real" impact. You can read the whole story (3 chapters in one single article) on Medium.

Vous pouvez lire cet article en fran?ais dans son intégralité sur Medium

Please leave questions or comments below this post!

On a related topic, two blog posts you may enjoy (re) reading:

How to Measure Culture Change Without Killing It – Maintaining the essence of change despite the need for measurement

One Human At A Time – Lessons Learnt from an Epic Change Journey

This post was originally published on my blog WeNeedSocial.com

Rudy Vandamme, Ph.D.

Transformational trainer for Deep Evolvement | Consultant in organizational change | Transdisciplinary researcher

5 年

Hello Céline, time to read your blogs now.Your article reminds me the lessons of Foucault who warned us that many behaviors to change things for the better are a trap of self-delusion; a repetition of the same patriarchal pattern, making the other (the system, the manager, the world, the politics, nature) into a docile body of our exploitative greediness. I have experienced your contribution in Berlin as a genuine role model for vulnerability of the self-reflecting learner. I take your message very seriously when I think about my own actions. A good blog to use in my courses...

Veronica Lawrence Ortega

Efficient Happiness Ambassador/Inclusion Expert @ Efficient Happiness | EdD

5 年

I really enjoyed this article. The part that truly resonates with me is that sometimes leaders are the creators of the very culture they are trying to change. Furthermore, some of the leaders that ask for culture change and innovation, stiffle culture change, in support for traditional processes. I am interested in how to create a culture where we can provide effective feedback when the frozen middle that refuses change, are the same leaders that are asking for change. Alas, I was trying to open the link on how to change culture without killing it, but wasn't able to.

回复
Davin Tan ??

On a Mission to Empower People To Help Anxious Kids| Bringing Insights that Strengthen Family Connections | Part time Podcaster & Blogger | Child and Forensic Psychiatrist

5 年

Thanks Celine for this article in which you've pointed to several?salient issues?that present in many organisations. The description of your young colleagues' lack of insight about his own need for control, and the tendency to attribute failure to another's flaws?is not at all unusual, but in an organisational context such errors in thinking and biases becoming barriers to 'change'.?Being cognisant of our own contributions in the systems in which we are embedded, in my mind is?one of the desiderata for improving the way we work and relate with one another.

Waldemar Falinski

SAP Project Management and S/4HANA transition Advisory ???? ??

5 年

Dear Céline Schillinger?I take one "Change is not a matter of age." which I cannot agree more. That is so and even sometimes the change is easier with elder people as Millennials are sometimes very self satisfied. But I think we cannot consider any change in abstract way as there are many changes people love or even is case they fear (like with wedding) they manage because of ... huge load of positive emotions that leads them. This may be a key to hearts and souls ...:)

Lisa Kaiyong Friedrich

Marketing and Sales Lead at Sobi

5 年

Great article. love it. Transformation hits currently many companies, not many don't know what it means.?

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了