Culture and Power

Culture and Power

Considering ‘Culture’ through a systems lens, we may ask what ‘powers’ it. What types of power make it tick, stick, evolve or break??

If you are comfortable with a subjective perspective (and it’s best if you are, when it comes to culture, because that’s all you will get) then you can ask people. And if you do, then certain patterns of response recur.

  • Leaders power culture – and specifically a nuance of leader described with assorted intangible qualities that collectively make them ‘authentic’.
  • Shared Values power culture – and specifically the subset of possible values that constitute the ones that we like. There’s typically a social context overlaying these too, so there are certain values (like inclusivity) that need to be specifically called out to credential us, whilst others (like honesty) tend to be more implicit.
  • Purpose powers culture – and specifically a purpose that is open and shared, and is somehow deemed to ‘give’ us something in return. Note that the purpose of ‘making a ton of money’ is generally only acceptable if you are confidently in a space where others share that view, or where you can wrap it up in a parallel or complimentary wrapper of e.g. saving lives, or social good.
  • Sometimes ‘Time’ is seen to power it – that which we have always done, or founded upon a shared legacy, although use this with care as for others, youth and ‘newness’ is the power that counts.
  • Visibility powers culture – either in terms of ‘culture is what we do in plain sight’, but also it’s what we do when nobody can see. Which i’m pretty sure makes it everything we do.

If you continue with this activity, you will generally find yourself revolving slowly as you look up, down, and all around, before finally looking within. Because there is no clear single location of culture, and no clear power structure surrounding or powering it.

Which is not to say that all things are equal.

One perspective is that culture consists of the ‘Structural’, the ‘Behavioural’ and the ‘Belief’ we hold in it.

Structural aspects are those held in rules, systems, processes, formalised consequence etc. Belief is what is hold inside. And Behaviour is what i do.

In this perspective ‘Behaviour’ may legitimately be considered as prime, in that it’s the closest thing we have to the tangible and quantifiable. I may not know what drives your actions, and i may not believe in your words, but i can at least observe your actions.

Action is culture made manifest, and hence arguably the only part of culture that is real.

In this view, it is behaviour above all else that powers culture.

David Wright

CEO - Director - Agent for beneficial and holistic change in the world. Working at the intersection of education, wellbeing, health, business, living systems understanding and place-based systems change.

8 个月

Julian Stodd Thanks for a great question to start this crisp and clear morning in our part of the world. If culture is a ‘common consensual delusion’, culture is ‘how we are with each other in every day’ , then what powers it? Is "common consensual delusion" culture or mindset? Perhaps from an alternate systems lens, could the power be an embodied patterning of the mind that observes and reacts to an energy-information exchange? Does that then suggest that "observed behaviour" powers culture? Happy Days! ?? ? ??

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Julian Stodd的更多文章

  • #WorkingOutLoud on the Planetary Philosophy

    #WorkingOutLoud on the Planetary Philosophy

    I’ve been immersed in this work today, and will be till the end of the week. Sae has carved out some time, and has…

  • Strategic AI: Domains of Disruption

    Strategic AI: Domains of Disruption

    I’m building out the materials for my new ‘Strategic AI’ workshop, based on the book ‘Engines of Engagement: a curious…

    1 条评论
  • Spaces of Safety

    Spaces of Safety

    Our Organisations must hold a somewhat unusual space, when stacked up against what we see in our broader society. As…

    2 条评论
  • Social Leadership Fragments: Permeability

    Social Leadership Fragments: Permeability

    The impact of social and collaborative technologies has been to make many boundariesmore permeable, with a range of…

  • Social Leadership: Organisation as Ecosystem

    Social Leadership: Organisation as Ecosystem

    Today I’ve been working on the new Social Leadership material, and specifically the notion of the ‘Organisation as…

    2 条评论
  • Fragments: Metacognition, Transdisciplinarity, Sense Making

    Fragments: Metacognition, Transdisciplinarity, Sense Making

    Some of the most exciting areas of learning research are considering features such as the ‘expert generalist’, aspects…

    1 条评论
  • #WorkingOutLoud on the Socially Dynamic Organisation: Disaggregation

    #WorkingOutLoud on the Socially Dynamic Organisation: Disaggregation

    The shift from the Domain based Organisation, through to the Socially Dynamic one, is essentially a disaggregation of…

    2 条评论
  • Writing

    Writing

    I spent last week completely focussed on a longer piece of writing and today am simply sharing some fragments of…

  • London Dereliction Walk: the Edge of Practice

    London Dereliction Walk: the Edge of Practice

    This is the third time I’ve guided the experimental London Dereliction Walk, which is a day of exploration and small…

    5 条评论
  • The Social Context of Generative AI

    The Social Context of Generative AI

    ‘Engines of Engagement: a curious book about Generative AI’ was published a year ago, and my thinking has continued to…

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了