The Cult of Psychometric

The Cult of Psychometric

The sign of a first rate intelligence is the capacity to hold to opposing truths and still retain the ability to function" - F.Scott-Fitzgerald

The problem with psychometric is not the tool it is the facilitator, let me start there and keep shooting. I've been delivering psychometric for over two decades which is longer enough to have a t-shirt that says, "I've got the t-shirt".

What seems to happen in development is possibly more defined than in many other spheres of life, it is when you get the people that really shouldn't be in development, as they haven't done the work on themselves, but rather have validated themselves through their learning and qualifications.

This is true in all aspects of life, however in development you get this strange breed of person who was a little bit broken and in the process of learning their craft got a little bit of religion (their favourite psychometric or learning methodology)and then it started to go horribly wrong.

You see these people in other walks of life, though they are easier to spot as they really stand out, they are evangelists, so you can kind of go:

Righty ho then, mental note to self, don't invite them to the party again

It's harder to do that when the person who thinks like that, who in all other aspects of their life seems quite normal but in this one area has quite literally lost the capacity to reason and is:

  • in you HR/L&D Function
  • a team member
  • the person giving you the feedback ad you just realised......."nutter"

Not Fact

Of course passion is important, however the danger with any tool, psychometric in particular is that.....especially preference tools....they are NOT absolute fact.

What I mean is that they are a guide and an indicator.

The truth of the matter is that most tools in this arena are quite good, after that you have preference as to usability etc.

What tends to happen is that the cult psychometric giver has had a personal epiphany on their feedback, which is usually little to do with the tool, but more to do with quality of the facilitation of the tool.

This person then gets accredited and now believes they are anointing everyone with its wonderfulness.

In fact

What they are doing is switching a lot of people off psychometric and usually reinforcing the caricature of people in the learning game being a bit woolly (#bit mental)

My Point

  • Don't buy into the tool, too much
  • Yes have a preference, (just remember all ice cream is good, even pistachio)
  • Accreditation hasn't made you good at delivery, it just explained it to you

Note

If you frame your entire world view through the lens of your favourite psychometric and see it as the only one that is any good and that somehow you seem to bring it into every conversation...then:

____________________________________________

Guy Bloom is a Leadership Evolutionist and the creator of Living Brave with a commitment to bring the future of leadership into the present day and help businesses create a sustainable, legacy driven, commercially savvy environment.


Judith Haupt

Inspiring a humane economy - reinventing how we work and lead

7 年

Thank you for a great article, Guy. And yes, AGREED on self-development! And I particularly agree with Dan Barnfield's comment - for us, it's about how USEFUL a model is... if it provides insight, wonderful! If it enables people to act in ways that feel more aligned with who they are and contribute to a better workplace, great. In my experience there are many different models that achieve similar results. We always say we're not 'married to a method' - we have some models that we feel are useful most of the time, but of course look at the client and context, make an (educated) 'guess' about what could be useful for them, and are lucky in that it often provides much insight. I would hate to view the world and people through one lense only!

Sébastien Simonet

CEO - Work & Organizational Psychologist, Nantys Ltd.

7 年

First of all I think it would be important to define what a psychometric test is and what kind of "tests" such as the MBTI have nothing (!) to do with psychometry, see: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myers%E2%80%93Briggs_Type_Indicator. Further, "real" tests need to prrove their efficacy through f.ex. validity measures.

Jemma Barton

Consultant | Facilitator | Executive Coach

7 年

I particularly agree with your point about self work. Those within the development profession have a duty to deeply understand what they are bringing to the table and it's influence. Especially when using tools that aim to provide psychological understanding to others. Maybe slightly more controversially pistachio is my favourite ice cream...

Hilary Ann Baird

Passionate about helping people navigate this changing landscape

7 年

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了