CTP vs BTRM: A Comparative Review for Treasury Professionals

CTP vs BTRM: A Comparative Review for Treasury Professionals

Treasury management offers a range of certifications tailored to different aspects of the profession. A recent question from Pradip Kumar on LinkedIn asked about the Certified Treasury Professional (CTP) certification, a well-established credential in the US, and how it compares to other qualifications like the BTRM (Certificate of Bank Treasury Risk Management).

Both certifications have distinct strengths, and their suitability depends on the specific career path and focus of the individual. Below is a comparison of the two to help professionals make an informed choice.


Certified Treasury Professional: Strengths and Limitations

The CTP, offered by the Association for Financial Professionals, is widely respected in the US and focuses on the key competencies of corporate treasury management. It provides foundational knowledge in areas such as cash management, financial planning, and working capital optimisation.

Strengths of the CTP:

1. Well-Known in Corporate Treasury:

The CTP is a strong choice for professionals working in corporate treasury roles, especially in the US. Its focus on liquidity management, operational cash flow, and risk management makes it highly relevant for this audience.

2. Industry Recognition in the US:

As a popular credential in the United States, the CTP is highly regarded among American corporations, enhancing employability for treasury professionals in this region.

3. Comprehensive Curriculum:

The programme covers a wide array of topics, offering a good foundation for those entering the treasury profession.

Limitations of the CTP:

1. Narrow Applicability Outside Corporate Treasury:

While it excels in corporate treasury, the CTP does not address banking-specific treasury areas such as interest rate risk, balance sheet optimisation, or regulatory compliance.

2. Limited Global Reach:

Although well-known in the US, the CTP has less recognition internationally compared to other certifications, which might limit its appeal for professionals in global or banking-focused roles.

3. Less Practical Emphasis:

The programme leans more toward theoretical knowledge, which may not always translate directly to the day-to-day challenges of treasury management.


How BTRM Compares

The BTRM is designed specifically for professionals in banking and financial services, offering a deep dive into bank treasury risk management and balance sheet optimisation. It takes a more focused and practical approach, particularly for those managing risks in a bank's balance sheet.

Key Features of the BTRM:

1. Specialisation in Bank Treasury:

The BTRM addresses topics like liquidity risk, funding risk, market risk in the banking book, and regulatory capital, making it a solid option for professionals working in or aspiring to roles in bank treasury and ALM.

2. Practical Approach:

The programme emphasises real-world scenarios, equipping participants with the tools and techniques to manage complex challenges in banking treasury.

3. Global Reach and Flexibility:

With an entirely online delivery format and a global alumni network, the BTRM provides significant flexibility and opportunities for networking across international markets.

4. Academic and Professional Recognition:

The BTRM is accredited by the Association of Corporate Treasurers and offers a Certificate of Advanced Studies from the University of Northwestern Switzerland, blending professional credibility with academic credentials.

Considerations for the BTRM:

1. Focus on Banking:

While its banking focus is a strength, the BTRM may not be the best fit for professionals working exclusively in corporate treasury.

2. Rigorous Programme:

The weekly lectures and final examination require consistent effort, but this ensures graduates are well-prepared for real-world treasury challenges.


CTP vs BTRM: Which Is the Right Fit?

Both certifications are valuable but cater to different professional needs:

- Choose the CTP if:

- You are focused on corporate treasury and need foundational knowledge in cash management, working capital, and liquidity.

- Your career is US-focused or aligned with American corporate standards.

- Choose the BTRM if:

- You are pursuing a career in bank treasury or financial services, especially in roles involving asset-liability management, regulatory compliance, and balance sheet optimisation.

- You want practical, globally relevant training that equips you for immediate application in real-world banking scenarios.


The CTP and BTRM are both strong certifications, but their relevance depends on your career goals. The CTP is an excellent choice for corporate treasury professionals, particularly in the US, while the BTRM offers a deeper, more practical dive into the complexities of bank treasury and risk management, with a broader international scope.

If your focus is on banking or ALM, the BTRM might offer the specialised knowledge and practical skills you need to succeed. However, for those in corporate treasury, the CTP provides a solid foundation.

Both are valuable credentials—your choice should reflect your long-term aspirations!

Bill Thomas

VP, Asset Liability Manager - Balance Sheet Management at Bank of America

1 周

This is helpful, thanks Claire. I had heard of the CTP, but admittedly I am less familiar with the BTRM. Interestingly, I work in Balance Sheet Management at BofA and most people in my space will get their CFA, and some have also done the FRM, which I believe is more risk-focused. Earlier this year I took Level I of the CFA (gratefully passed it) as I wanted to get a better understanding of what I would learn through that certification (obviously to be chartered I would have to pass levels II and III as well). The curriculum is extremely broad in Level I, and does cover topics such as Fixed Income, Derivatives and hedging, Financial Statement Analysis, all of which I have found useful in my role in ALM. But it also covers topics that are less directly relevant (probably more tangentially related) such as quantitative methods, economics, portfolio management (as if I was an investment advisor helping to set up and manage investment portfolios), equity investments, and alternative investments. There are other topics as well, such as CFA ethical and professional standards. But the curriculum certainly wasn’t banking specific, like the BTRM, which makes me wonder why I haven’t heard of it before.

Pradip Kumar

Analytics | Strategy | BI

1 周

Claire Trythall Thanks for the comparative review.

Madhavi Ananth

Director of Financial Planning & Analysis FP&A | Director of Credit Risk | Strategic Forecasting Financial Modeling | Lending | Financial Services | Driving profits for Companies with budgets up to $5 B

1 周

Hi Claire, this is very insightful.

Venu Madhav Kalluru

FCA, CPA, FCMA, CIA | SOX | Internal Audit | Financial Reporting | ERM | IFRS | US GAAP

1 周

Hi Claire....you have explained it well. Most often, professionals miss out on the difference between corporate treasury and bank treasury functions and consider both as same.

要查看或添加评论,请登录