Shareholder Value: Lessons for India from the U.S. Experience

In recent decades, the principle of maximizing shareholder value has emerged as a dominant force in corporate decision-making across the globe. Originating in the United States, this ideology has significantly influenced business strategies worldwide, including in India.

In his article "How the Cult of Shareholder Value Wrecked American Business," published in September 2013, Steven Pearlstein explores the detrimental effects of prioritizing shareholder value. This concept gained prominence in the 1970s and 1980s and has since led to short-termism, income inequality, and underinvestment in crucial areas such as R&D, worker training, and infrastructure.

Historically, American corporations were chartered for public purposes, with no legal mandate to maximize shareholder value. However, globalization and deregulation in the 1970s shifted corporate priorities toward stock prices and profits, often at the expense of workers and communities. This shift was reinforced by hostile takeovers, executive compensation linked to stock performance, and the teachings of business schools advocating for shareholder-first policies.

It has been argued that shareholder-first capitalism has not delivered superior returns. In fact, during the era of "managerial capitalism," when companies balanced the interests of all stakeholders, stock returns were higher than in the current era of "shareholder capitalism." Despite this, top executives have benefited from soaring compensation packages.

Furthermore, shareholder capitalism has driven widespread outsourcing, lower wages, and negative externalities, such as tax avoidance and reduced public investment. Pearlstein critiques the hypocrisy of corporate leaders who claim to serve shareholders while simultaneously minimizing shareholder involvement in governance.

Reforms are necessary to shift the focus from short-term profits to long-term value creation. Suggested solutions include recalibrating capital gains taxes, discouraging quarterly earnings projections, and empowering long-term shareholders. A new generation of workers and investors, focused on social value and purpose, might eventually free corporations from the narrow focus on maximizing shareholder value.

As Indian businesses increasingly prioritize short-term profits and shareholder returns, it is crucial to assess the lessons learned from the U.S., where this approach has had profound negative consequences. By examining the American experience and understanding the specific challenges in India, we can better grasp the implications of this philosophy for the Indian economy.

The U.S. experience with shareholder capitalism offers valuable lessons for Indian businesses. The pursuit of short-term shareholder value in the U.S. has contributed to economic instability, inequality, and underinvestment in critical areas. If India adopts a similar approach, the consequences could be comparable.

India must balance the pressure to maximize shareholder returns with the need for long-term value creation, inclusive growth, and sustainable development. Companies that focus on all stakeholders — shareholders, employees, customers, and communities — are more likely to thrive over the long term.

As Indian businesses continue to integrate with global financial markets, the pressure to maximize shareholder value will likely intensify. However, India must learn from the U.S. experience and avoid the pitfalls of short-termism and an excessive focus on stock prices. By fostering a corporate environment that prioritizes long-term value creation, inclusive growth, and sustainability, India can build a resilient and equitable economy for the future.

The challenge for Indian businesses and policymakers is to strike the right balance — one that serves not only shareholders but all stakeholders in the economy. Only then can India chart a path toward sustainable prosperity that benefits everyone.

?