Crossroads: Why the Prevailing Competence Narrative Has to Change
Introduction
The belief that completing the MPQC Site Safety Awareness and Behaviour Course serves as definitive proof of competence is a dangerous misconception that could undermine industry safety standards. While the course provides some useful knowledge, it lacks critical components necessary for a comprehensive evaluation of driver competence. This critique will logically challenge this notion, highlighting the substantial differences between theoretical knowledge and actual demonstrable skills, as exemplified by the EMPI Awards Site Vehicle Competence Assessment (SVCA).
Theoretical Knowledge vs. Practical Competence
Driver CPC Course:
Logical Flaw:
EMPI Awards SVCA:
Logical Strength:
领英推荐
Industry Safety and Accountability
Safety Standards:
Accountability:
Conclusion
The idea that completing the Driver CPC Site Safety Awareness and Behaviour course is proof of competence is fundamentally flawed. Competence, particularly in safety-critical roles, requires more than theoretical knowledge; it demands the ability to apply that knowledge in real-world scenarios, continuous learning, and regular assessment. The EMPI Awards SVCA addresses these needs through its comprehensive, practical, and ongoing evaluation process. By contrast, the Driver CPC Site Safety Awareness and Behaviour course, with its theoretical approach and test, falls short of providing a true measure of driver competence.
To ensure the highest safety standards and genuine proof of competence, the industry must recognise the limitations of the Driver CPC Site Safety Awareness and Behaviour course and adopt more rigorous and comprehensive assessments like the SVCA. Only then can we ensure that drivers are truly competent and capable of maintaining safety in the demanding environments of quarrying, mineral extraction, ready-mix concrete & transport.
Gavin Brain BA(Hons) FIQ ASET Professional Educator with 25 Years of Experience in Industrial Competence Assessment Responsible/Accountable Officer of EMPI Awards
Responsible Officer at EMPI Awards
9 个月Hundreds of views, even more impressions, and yet: Not a single comment. With a spirit of collaboration so loudly & earnestly championed by industry leaders, why can't we have an open & transparent dialogue on areas that require improvement? I reckon I know why... However, any thoughts and feedback are welcome. ??