Cross-Atlantic Investment Shift
In this issue of the Peel:
To Win the M&A Game, It Helps to Know the Terrain
Ah, the annual SRS Acquiom M&A Deal Terms Study. It’s back again already? You bet it is. And, as always, it’s bubbling over with the deal data and insights you need to be truly in the know.
You won’t get this intel from industry news sites, regulatory filings, or any other sources, by the way. Nope, only the SRS Acquiom Study provides analysis of more than 2,100 private-target acquisitions valued at more than $460 billion—most of which aren’t required to be publicly reported.
Why should you care? Think: better negotiating and smoother due diligence. Think: avoiding potential transaction issues. Think: competitive advantage for you and your clients, and all the good stuff that comes with it.
By the way, the Study is free. You have no excuse not to download it right now.
Banana Bits
Macro Monkey Says
Over the Hedge
In addition to being the title of a classic American cinematic masterpiece, “Over the Hedge” also appears to be how many investors seem to be thinking about U.S. markets.
According to?the FT, hedge funds are beginning to?hedge?away their U.S. exposure. But, at the same time, retail investors simply seem over it.
During the prior week, U.S. retail investors loaded up on a $7bn net addition in their exposure to U.S. markets. At the same time, hedge funds did almost the opposite; they didn’t pile into bonds, but something far worse—they increased exposure to Europe.
Alright, alright—let’s not get too crazy here. What’s actually going on?
For the majority of the careers of many Wall Street professionals, the exact opposite has been the case. Sure, in school, they teach you about “geographic diversification,” but for a whole generation of people that pronounce finance as “fih-nance,” U.S. outperformance is all they know.
Now, the data from Goldman is a nearly nonexistent sample size, and the anecdotal evidence in the rest of the article is just that, anecdotal. But the message and questions driving these themes clearly have some worried.
?"But the message and questions driving these themes clearly have some worried."
If this reallocation towards the other side of the pond is, in fact, as widespread as this data and stories suggest, there are quite literally only two possible justifications. Of course, they are:
I think we know which of the two is more likely the mainstream narrative.
Backing the view of U.S. multiple contraction-led outperformance by Euro area stocks appears to be two drivers: rate hikes and international discounts.
For a multitude of reasons (such as a history of innovation, less bureaucracy, cheaper & deeper financing, a more robust consumer, etc., etc.) U.S. companies and their cash flows have been valued at more cents on the dollar, if you will, than their European counterparts. Basically, investors are willing to pay more now for future cash flows in the U.S. than anywhere else.
"... it could be as simple as outperformance leading outperformance ..."
?However, given JPow’s recent nuclear rate bomb, outpacing many Western counterparts, elevated discount rates here stateside could contribute to U.S. underperformance, as one crackpot theory goes.
As for the other crackpot theory, European stocks trade at hefty, hefty, hefty discounts to U.S. names. A lot of this is due to the same reasons laid out above, but it could be as simple as outperformance leading outperformance; the U.S. had been doing better for so long that investors got more and more sure that trend would continue.
So far, in the post-GFC environment, that’s been the case. But that sure as hell doesn’t mean it’ll last forever.
It’s an early sign of what could be a major story, but if the trend of going over the hedge and across the pond continues, anything is possible.
What's Ripe
Coinbase (COIN)?↑ 9.78% ↑
Zillow (Z)?↑ 9.12% ↑
What's Rotten
Eli Lilly (LLY)?↓ 3.04% ↓
JetBlue (JBLU)?↓ 2.59% ↓
Data Peel
Thought Banana
An Active Vision
After a year-and-a-half?blizzard?involving bureaucracy so extensive it’d make Karl Marx jealous, a U.S. court has officially given the green light to one of the country’s largest acquisitions since the Louisiana Purchase.
Yesterday, a federal judge made Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella’s dreams come true while simultaneously ruining those of FTC Chair Lina Khan by allowing the firm’s $68.7bn purchase of Activision Blizzard to go through.
Wow. Microsoft’s largest acquisition of all time just took perhaps its biggest step towards passing Go.
"Now, the deal took what is likely the biggest step forward toward completion."
?Many wrote this thing off as having no shot of U.S. approval from the get-go, especially under a true-blue administration like Joey B’s was expected to be. Now, the deal took what is likely the biggest step forward toward completion.
In reading about this deal, you’ll see figures from $65bn to $75bn tossed around as the acquisition price. To clear things up, the deal is structured as follows:
Not sure if that was annoying everyone else as much as it was me, but glad we cleared that up.
Anyway, let’s see what exactly happened because, despite how it stands, this could still be far from the end of the road.
Yesterday, a U.S. federal judge?declined?to grant the FTC a restraining order it had requested to?stop?the deal. Basically, the U.S. federal court circuit declined to decline the deal. The FTC still has a whole a** antitrust lawsuit filed, but nevertheless, the deal remains scheduled to close on July 18th.
Without the restraining order, the deal is all but guaranteed to go through by that date. But that doesn’t stop the FTC from blocking the deal via a forced separation/divestiture, kind of like if one spouse’s ex-partner showed up on their honeymoon.
As expected, Activision shares ripped on the news, gaining over 10% exclusively on these headlines. Meanwhile, Microsoft gained just under 0.2% on the day, a sign that investors view the deal as mostly accretive, especially in the long term.
?"... the deal still has to work through other legal challenges like that in the U.K. ..."
Of course, the deal still has to work through other legal challenges like that in the U.K., but it pretty much seems to hinge solely on the fact that these regulators are scared Microsoft will limit games like Call of Duty to strictly Xbox and Microsoft cloud platforms.
If the firm is able to sell some kind of deal to regulators promising that will not be the case, expect to see new CoD campaigns drop on Excel sometime soon.
The big question:?Will Microsoft’s acquisition of Activision Blizzard ever actually be finalized? If not, what will stop it at this point? How does this combined company impact the future of gaming in the U.S. and globally, from both a consumer and investor perspective?
Banana Brain Teaser
Yesterday?—?Insert one word in each pair to link the two words together. The end of the first word is the beginning of the second.
Answers
Today?—?The following words have a similar characteristic. Can you tell me what that is, apart from the fact that they are all nouns?
Shoot us your guesses [email protected]?with the subject line?“Banana Brain Teaser”.
Wise Investor Says
“The ability to do nothing is one of the most underappreciated skills in investing.”?— Morgan Housel
How would you rate today’s Peel?
Happy Investing,
Patrick & The Daily Peel Team
127+ Web, mobile app, 3D animated video production including Chatbots, VR, AR, VFX, CGI, AI, MI, CRM, Web applications and Mobile app Technetology Canada AI Digital Technologies Pakistan Whatsapp +923305249427
1 年Hey! Patrick Curtis How are you doing?
Founder & Managing Partner | Celeborn Capital
1 年Great share, Patrick!