The critical importance of continuous improvement in the laboratory
National Association of Testing Authorities, Australia
NATA provides assessment, accreditation and training services to laboratories and technical facilities.
In today’s rapidly evolving scientific landscape, ensuring that your laboratory remains future fit is essential. Continuous improvement, a core principle in quality management, plays a crucial role in achieving this. While many laboratories implement changes to keep up with technological advancements and enhance efficiency, it is important to distinguish between mere change and genuine improvement. The effectiveness of a laboratory is not defined by the number of changes made but by the quality and impact of these changes on overall performance.?
A compelling analogy can be drawn from a story about a boy who trained his spider to fetch. Despite his efforts, the spider never learned to retrieve the ball, highlighting a crucial point: Training or implementing changes does not necessarily lead to improvement. Similarly, laboratories may undergo various changes—like introducing new technologies or updating procedures—but without careful consideration of their impact, these changes may fail to achieve the desired improvements.?
One common mistake is assuming that adopting new technologies automatically leads to improvement. For example, a laboratory might roll out tablets for technicians to record data in the field, believing this will streamline operations. However, if the environment is not conducive to using the tablets—such as extreme heat or lack of shade in remote locations—the technology may become a hindrance rather than a help. Technicians may resort to using scrap paper, increasing the risk of data loss or errors during transcription.?
Another example is the installation of screens at workbenches to display work instructions and procedures. While this may seem like an improvement, it could lead to unintended consequences if the screens are too small to display all necessary information clearly. Technicians might then print out uncontrolled copies of procedures, potentially undermining the accuracy and reliability of the process.?
These scenarios illustrate that not all changes are improvements. For a change to qualify as an improvement, it must enhance the laboratory’s ability to achieve its goals while minimising risks. Continuous improvement practices emphasise the importance of evaluating changes after implementation to ensure they meet expectations. This process, often described using the Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle, involves planning the change, implementing it, checking the results, and acting based on the findings.?
领英推荐
The “check” step is particularly crucial, as it provides an opportunity to assess whether the change has led to a true improvement. Without this follow-up, laboratories risk implementing changes that fail to deliver the intended benefits, potentially exposing the organisation to increased risks. For instance, if a laboratory connects its equipment to a network for automated data collection but fails to secure the network folder, it could inadvertently introduce a vulnerability that compromises data integrity.?
To foster continuous improvement, laboratories should encourage input from all levels of the organisation. This involves creating a culture where staff feel empowered to suggest improvements, no matter how small. By doing so, laboratories can ensure that changes are not only well-intentioned but also effective in enhancing performance.?
Continuous improvement is more than just a buzzword—it’s an essential practice for laboratories aiming to stay ahead in an ever-changing world. By focusing on genuine improvements, engaging in regular evaluation, and embracing input from all levels, laboratories can build a resilient, future-fit environment.?
Key takeaways:?