"Critical Assessment of the Impact of HR Strategies on Employees’ Performance"?
Image Ref: Metis Japan | Article Co-authored by Ali Bin Nadeem, Sana Anwaar, Misbah Hassan

"Critical Assessment of the Impact of HR Strategies on Employees’ Performance"

Line managers are considered as one of the greatest assets of a company. Therefore, it is vital to satisfy them and keep them actively engaged so that they can add value to the organization. This research explores the alternative Human Resource (HR) strategies to support line managers at Sainsbury’s Southern. The research is based on semi-structured interviews conducted with line managers at various levels and across different departments of the company, aimed at exploring the perceptions and experience of the line managers in terms of HR devolution and the level of support provided to them by HR. Secondary data have been used to identify previous works on the topic of HR devolution as well as HR support to line and to also identify the various strategies to facilitate the line managers so that they can perform their new role more efficiently. The findings revealed that the trend of devolution has been successful as the employees interviewed are satisfied with the level of support provided to them by HR. However, some employees raised a few concerns i.e. inadequate training, unclear perceptions regarding the policies, increased workload, ineffective HR practices, etc., and feel that these need to be improved so that they can perform their new role more effectively.

Keywords:?HR Strategies , Line Manager , Employee Performance .

Conclusion

This research is aimed at critically assessing the alternative HR strategies to support line managers at Sainsbury’s Southern. The objectives of this research were accomplished through primary as well as secondary data. The literature review discussed the findings by several authors regarding HR devolution to line and the support that HR gives to line in the transition and how it affects the overall performance of the organization. In the beginning, the significance of line managers and the HR function in the organization has been discussed. It was analyzed that line managers play a fundamental role in people’s management and their role is vital to the success of HR policies and practices as HR strategies cannot be successfully implemented without their involvement, commitment, and cooperation. The research indicated some positive links between HR support to line managers and higher organizational performance. It was also found that strong HR support to line enables organizations to achieve higher competitive advantage. The literature review also discussed the major HR practices enacted by line managers i.e. Recruitment and Selection, Performance Management, Learning and Development, Reward Management, Discipline and Grievance, and other HR policies.

The primary data were collected through semi-structured interviews, based on six key themes, out of which three were selected for this report. It revealed that majority of the line managers interviewed were satisfied with the level of support they get from HR. From the author’s perspective, one reason for the satisfaction could be the open and friendly atmosphere of the stores as well as the non-hierarchal culture of the organization that fosters creativity and encourages collaboration.

The research further revealed that majority of the line managers in the three sites were happy with the devolution trend as they acknowledge that they are the ones who work closely with their colleagues and can therefore manage them more effectively than HR. They also believed that they have adequate support from HR in terms of training and guidance to perform their new role. On the other hand, a few numbers of managers said that either they are not provided with any training or the kind of support they are provided is very poor, due to which they feel ill-equipped to perform their devolved role. One reason for the inadequate training and support may be the wrong perception of HR managers who believe that since line managers have always had the responsibility for people management, they have sufficient knowledge to carry out their devolved role. Similarly, another reason for dissatisfaction highlighted by some line managers is the increased workload that holds them from performing their other duties.

The research also found that the communication and frequency of contact between HR and Line is very good as HR not only communicates with them on a daily basis but is also very approachable and keeps them informed regarding the new policies and procedures of the company. Furthermore, in terms of HR policies and practices, although most line managers agree that the HR policies are effective and help them in their new role, the sickness and absence, recruitment and selection, and the bonus policy according to some managers needs improvement so that they can fully benefit from it.

Further, the main people management problems recognized by majority of line managers are their own unclear perception of HR policies, lack of efficiency, and low morale of staff due to their changing working pattern, the rigid mind set of long-serving employees and alienation. It is assumed that that lack of physical/visual training and inadequate support may be one of the main reasons for all these problems. Nevertheless, a very limited number of managers said that HR has trained them in the right way to tackle all these problems.

Although all the (interviewed) line managers agreed that they work in partnership with HR to accomplish the overall goals of the organization, it was found that since HR policies are made at the head office, and that they do not contribute in the policy-making. HR in the store and the Line managers are only the implementers of the policies. However, some of respondents said that even though they do not contribute, their opinion does count and is also recognized.

Next, learning and development was identified as the area where line managers get the most HR support. It was revealed that HR not only supports line managers in imparting training to their colleagues but also provides them training and courses to prepare them for future. The area where line managers get the second highest support was recruitment and selection. It was found that HR does most of the initial bits of the recruitment and selection process i.e. the advertising of vacancy, getting the slots filled, and preparing the interview pack, etc. The responsibility of interviewing and selecting the employee lies with the managers. However, the final decision is always made by the HR rather than the line. Although most line managers interviewed said that they are satisfied with the process, one respondent said that he needs some more training for recruitment and selection so that in future when the HR completely vanishes, he is able to carry out the process himself. Similarly, Reward management was classified as the third area of strong HR support. It was revealed that though line managers have some autonomy in the actual process, they are not involved in the formulation of the reward strategy. It was discovered that HR communicates the process to them via meetings and then asks them to put forward their nomination. Therefore, it can be said that line managers contribute a little in the process rather than giving their recommendations and determining the wages and salaries of their colleagues. After reward management, discipline and grievance were recognized as the next areas where HR supports the line managers. It was found that HR not only guides line managers but also supports them by providing them a note taker for the disciplinary meeting. Moreover, it was also revealed that line managers get support in terms of working hours, holidays, and health and safety. The support provided by HR is in terms of communication, advice and training in this context was also highlighted by the data analysis. Furthermore, a low number of people said that they get strong HR support in terms of Performance management.

On the contrary, HR policies were identified as the area of weakest HR support as most as most managers claimed that they are not fully aware of the policies and that they are not even properly communicated to them. Further it was also found that due to unclear perception and poor communication, some manager follows the policies according to their own understanding which affects the performance of the organization. Another area of concern highlighted by most managers was that the store trainers do not cover all shifts. Also, it was found that some managers were unable to carry out the training sessions of their staff due to increased work load. It was also suggested that HR should alone design and run the training sessions so that the line managers can concentrate on other tasks. In addition to this, it was discovered that due to lack of training, most managers are unsure of the skills they need for managing their staff as the only support they are offered is the pack of policies to read through rather than providing them with proper training. It has also been suggested the HR should share the responsibility of discipline and grievance process with line managers instead of giving them the whole responsibility to carry out the process. Lack of recognition was another weak area identified by some line manager as they said that they do not get recognized for the amount of work that they do. Lastly, it was suggested by some respondents that HR should redesign the process of recruitment and include a role play in the process so that they can they can determine how a person will behave in a particular situation and hence select the most suitable candidate for the job. The forgoing findings show that the aim and objectives of the report have been fully achieved.

Since the three branches of Sainsbury’s i.e. Bitterne, Portswood, and Shirley have recently gone through HR restructuring, it is important for the stores to satisfy its line managers as they are the core of their organization and without their cooperation, the company wouldn’t be able to perform well. This study will help the stores, understand the importance of HR contribution to support the line managers. It will be beneficial for the company in a way that it will highlight the different perspectives of the line managers, with regard to HR devolution and also their perceptions regarding the HR policies and consider new ideas and opinions as a feedback into its existing policy, so as to attain a higher level of business success.

To conclude, this study covered the alternative HR strategies for Sainsbury’s branches and highlighted probable solutions to enhance its success in business. However, all these findings should be viewed in the light of various limitations of the study including the small sample and the results may differ in case of a larger sample size. Also, since the authors were constrained by time and information accessibility limitation, there certainly is further scope for research on this topic.

For access to the original co-authored publication visit: https://bit.ly/3hSFyyZ

References

  1. Andersen,?K. K.,?Cooper,?B. K., &?Zhu,?C. J.?(2007).?The effect of SHRM practices on perceived firm financial performance: Some initial evidence from Australia.?Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources,?45,?168–179.10.1177/1038411107079111?[Crossref] ,?[Web of Science ?] ,?[Google Scholar]
  2. Armstrong,?M.?(2000).?Performance management practice: Key practices and practical guidelines.?London:?Kogan.?[Google Scholar]
  3. Armstrong,?G.?(2005).?Differentiation through people: How can HR move beyond business partner??Human Resource Management?[online],?44,?195–199.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-050X?[Crossref] ,?[Web of Science ?] ,?[Google Scholar]
  4. Armstrong,?M.?(2009).?Armstrong’s handbook of performance management: An evidence-based guide to delivering high performance?(4th ed.).?London:?Kogan Page.?[Google Scholar]
  5. Atkinson,?J. M., &?Heritage,?J.?(1984).?Structures of social action.?Cambridge:?Cambridge University Press.?[Google Scholar]
  6. Bloom,?M., &?Milkovich,?G.?(1998).?Relationships among risk, incentive, pay and organisational performance.?Academy of Management Journal?[online],?41,?283–297.10.2307/256908?[Crossref] ,?[Web of Science ?] ,?[Google Scholar]
  7. Boselie,?P.,?Dietz,?G., &?Boon,?C.?(2005).?Commonalities and contradictions in HRM and performance research.?Human Resource Management Journal,?15,?67–94.?[Crossref] ,?[Google Scholar]
  8. Bowen,?D. E., &?Ostroff,?C.?(2004).?Understanding HRM-firm performance linkages: The role of the “strength” of the HRM system.?Academy of Management Review,?29,?203–221.?[Crossref] ,?[Web of Science ?] ,?[Google Scholar]
  9. Brandl,?J.,?Madsen,?M. T., &?Madsen,?H.?(2009).?The perceived importance of HR duties to Danish line managers.?Human Resource Management Journal?[online],?19,?194–210.10.1111/hrmj.2009.19.issue-2?[Crossref] ,?[Web of Science ?] ,?[Google Scholar]
  10. Brewster,?C., &?Larsen,?H. H.?(2000).?Human resource management in northern Europe: Trends, dilemmas and strategy.?Oxford:?Blackwell.?[Google Scholar]
  11. Brewster,?C.?(2007).?Comparative HRM: European views and perspectives.?The International Journal of Human Resource Management,?18,?769–787.10.1080/09585190701248182?[Taylor & Francis Online] ,?[Web of Science ?] ,?[Google Scholar]
  12. Briscoe,?D.,?Schuler,?R., &?Tarique,?I.?(2012).?International human resource management: Policies and practices for multinational enterprises?(4th ed.).?New York,?NY:?Routledge.?[Crossref] ,?[Google Scholar]
  13. Brown,?D., &?Purcell,?J.?(2007).?Reward management: On the line.?Compensation & Benefits Review,?39,?28–34.10.1177/0886368707302649?[Crossref] ,?[Google Scholar]
  14. Budhwar,?P. S.?(2000).?Evaluating levels of strategic integration and devolvement of human resource management in the UK.?Personnel Review,?29,?141–157.??[Crossref] ,?[Web of Science ?] ,?[Google Scholar]
  15. Caldwell,?R.?(2003).?The changing roles of personnel managers: Old ambiguities, new uncertainties.?Journal of Management Studies,?40,?983–1004.?[Crossref] ,?[Web of Science ?] ,?[Google Scholar]
  16. Carlton,?I., &?Sloman,?M.?(1992).?Performance appraisal in practice.?Human Resource Management Journal,?2,?80–94.?[Crossref] ,?[Google Scholar]
  17. CIPD. (2005).?Reward strategy: How to develop a reward strategy?[online]. Retrieved July 10, 2012, from?https://www.cipd.co.uk/subjects/pay/rewrdmansurv.htm?IsSrchRes=1 ?[Google Scholar]
  18. CIPD. (2006).?Reward and diversity: A good practice guide to recognizing diversity through reward?[online]. Retrieved July 14, 2012.?[Google Scholar]
  19. CIPD. (2007).?Rewarding work: The vital role of line managers.?[Google Scholar]
  20. CIPD. (2011).?Management competencies for enhancing employee engagement.?[Google Scholar]
  21. CIPD. (2012).?Bringing policies to life: The vital role of front line managers in people.?Retrieved from?https://www2.cipd.co.uk/NR/rdonlyres/72035864-98CD-495A-8CB9-96989B96E73C/0/vitalrolmgrca.pdf ??[Google Scholar]
  22. Coens,?T., &?Jenkins,?M.?(2002).?Abolishing performance appraisals: Why they backfire and what to do instead.?Oakland, CABerrett-Koehler.?[Google Scholar]
  23. Cunningham,?I., &?Hyman,?J.?(1995).?Transforming the HRM vision into reality: The role of line managers and supervisors in implementing change.?Employee Relations,?17,?5–20.?[Crossref] ,?[Google Scholar]
  24. Currie,?G., &?Procter,?S.?(2001).?Exploring the relationship between HR and middle managers.?Human Resource Management Journal,?11,?53–69.10.1111/hrmj.2001.11.issue-3?[Crossref] ,?[Google Scholar]
  25. Eisenberger,?R.,?Eisenberger,?R.,?Stinglhamber,?F.,?Vandenberghe,?C.,?Sucharski,?I. L., &?Rhoades,?L.?(2002).?Perceived supervisor support: Contributions to perceived organizational support and employee retention.?Journal of Applied Psychology,?87,?565.?[Crossref] ,?[PubMed] ,?[Web of Science ?] ,?[Google Scholar]
  26. Francis,?H., &?Keegan,?A.?(2006).?The changing face of HRM: In search of balance.?Human Resource Management Journal,?16,?231–249.?[Crossref] ,?[Google Scholar]
  27. Furnham,?A.?(2004).?Performance management systems.?European Business Journal,?16,?83–94.?[Google Scholar]
  28. Garavan,?T. N.,?Barniclen,?B., &?Heraty,?N.?(1993).?The training and development function: Its search for power and influence in organizations.?Journal of European Industrial Training?[online],?17,?224–236.?[Crossref] ,?[Google Scholar]
  29. Gennard,?J., &?Kelly,?J.?(1997).?The unimportance of labels: The diffusion of the personnel/HRM function.?Industrial Relations Journal,?28,?27–42.?[Crossref] ,?[Google Scholar]
  30. Gilbert,?C.,?De Winnie,?S., &?Sels,?L.?(2011).?The influence of line managers and HR department on employees’ affective commitment.?The International Journal of Human Resource Management?[online],?22,?1618–1637.10.1080/09585192.2011.565646?[Taylor & Francis Online] ,?[Web of Science ?] ,?[Google Scholar]
  31. Gratton,?L., &?Truss,?C.?(2003).?The three-dimensional people strategy: Putting human resource policies into action.?Academy of Management Executive,?17,?74–86.?[Crossref] ,?[Google Scholar]
  32. Guest,?D., &?King,?Z.?(2001). HR and the bottom line: Has the penny dropped.?People Management,?20,?26–31.?[Google Scholar]
  33. Halcrow,?A.?(2002).?A 360-Degree View of HR. CEOs, line managers, and employees talk frankly about HR. Brace yourself.?WORKFORCE-COSTA MESA-,?81,?28–35.?[Google Scholar]
  34. Hales,?C.?(2005).?Rooted in supervision, branching into management: Continuity and change in the role of the first-line managers.?Journal of Management Studies,?42,?471–506.?[Crossref] ,?[Web of Science ?] ,?[Google Scholar]
  35. Hales,?C.?(2006).?Moving down the line? The shifting boundary between middle and first-line management.?Journal of General Management,?32,?31.?[Crossref] ,?[Google Scholar]
  36. Hall,?L., &?Torrington,?D.?(1998).?Letting go or holding on—The devolution of operational personnel activities.?Human Resource Management Journal,?8,?41–55.?[Crossref] ,?[Google Scholar]
  37. Harney,?B., &?Jordan,?C.?(2008).?Unlocking the black box: Line managers and HRM Performance in a call centre context.?International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management?[online],?57,?275–296.10.1108/17410400810867508?[Crossref] ,?[Google Scholar]
  38. Harris,?L.?(2001).?Rewarding employee performance: Line manager’s values, beliefs and perspectives.?The International Journal of Human Resource Management,?12,?1182–1192.?[Taylor & Francis Online] ,?[Web of Science ?] ,?[Google Scholar]
  39. Harris,?L.?(2007).?The changing nature of the HR function in UK local government and its role as “employee champion”.?Employee Relations?[online],?30,?34–47.10.1108/01425450810835400?[Crossref] ,?[Google Scholar]
  40. Harris,?L.,?Doughty,?D., &?Kirk,?S.?(2002).?The devolution of HR responsibilities—Perspectives from the UK’s public sector.?Journal of European Industrial Training,?26,?218–229.?[Crossref] ,?[Google Scholar]
  41. Harrison,?R.?(2002).?Learning and development?(2nd ed.).?London:?CIPD.?[Google Scholar]
  42. Hassan,?F.?(2011).?The frontline advantage.?Harvard Business Review,?89,?106–114.?[Google Scholar]
  43. Heraty,?N., &?Morley,?M.?(1995).?Line managers and human resource development.?Journal of European Industrial Training,?19,?31–37.?[Crossref] ,?[Google Scholar]
  44. Hope,?K.?(2006).?Pay packages need line manager input.?People Management.?[Google Scholar]
  45. Hsu,?Y., &?Leat,?M.?(2000).?A study of HRM and recruitment and selection policies and practices in Taiwan.?International Journal of Human Resource Management,?11,?413–435.?[Taylor & Francis Online] ,?[Web of Science ?] ,?[Google Scholar]
  46. Hutchinson,?S., &?Purcell,?J.?(2003).?Bringing policies to life: The vital role of front line managers in people management.?[Google Scholar]
  47. Kerr,?J. L.?(1985).?Diversification strategies and managerial rewards: An empirical study.?Academy of Management Journal,?28,?155–179.?[Crossref] ,?[Web of Science ?] ,?[Google Scholar]
  48. Knight,?J., &?Sheppard,?R.?(2011).?The role of line managers in L&D.?Training Journal.?[Google Scholar]
  49. Kulik,?C. T., &?Bainbridge,?H.T. J.?(2006).?HR and the line: The distribution of HR activities in Australian organizations.?Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources,?44,?240–256.?[Crossref] ,?[Google Scholar]
  50. Kulik,?C. T., &?Perry,?E. L.?(2008).?When less is more: The effect of devolution on HR’s strategic role and construed image.?Human Resource Management,?47,?541–558.?[Crossref] ,?[Web of Science ?] ,?[Google Scholar]
  51. Larsen,?H. H., &?Brewster,?C.?(2003).?Line management responsibility for HRM: What is happening in Europe??Employee Relations,?25,?228–244.?[Crossref] ,?[Google Scholar]
  52. Lee,?C. D.?(2005).?Rethinking the goals of your performance management system.?Employment Relations Today,?32,?53–60.?[Crossref] ,?[Google Scholar]
  53. Leisink,?P. L., &?Knies,?E.?(2011).?Line managers’ support for older workers.?The International Journal of Human Resource Management,?22,?1902–1917.10.1080/09585192.2011.573969?[Taylor & Francis Online] ,?[Web of Science ?] ,?[Google Scholar]
  54. Macky,?K., &?Boxall,?P.?(2007).?The relationship between ‘high-performance work practices’ and employee attitudes: An investigation of additive and interaction effects.?International Journal of Human Resource Management,?18,?537–567.?[Taylor & Francis Online] ,?[Web of Science ?] ,?[Google Scholar]
  55. MacNeil,?M.?(2006).?Evaluating the importance and performance of the human resources function.?Journal of Retailing and Consumer Service,?13,?143–156.?[Crossref] ,?[Google Scholar]
  56. Maxwell,?G., &?Farquharson,?L.?(2008).?Senior managers’ perceptions of the practice of human resource management.?Employee Relations,?30,?304–322.?[Crossref] ,?[Google Scholar]
  57. Maxwell,?G., &?Watson,?S.?(2004).?Lining up responsibility for HRM and HRD: The case of Hilton international’s UK hotels.?British Journal of Occupational Learning,?2,?29–48.?[Google Scholar]
  58. Maxwell,?G., &?Watson,?S.?(2006).?Perspectives on line managers in human resource management: Hilton international’s UK hotels.?International Journal of Human Resource Management,?17,?1152–1170.?[Taylor & Francis Online] ,?[Web of Science ?] ,?[Google Scholar]
  59. McCracken,?M., &?Wallace,?M.?(2000).?Towards a redefinition of strategic HRD.?Journal of European Industrial Training,?24,?281–290.?[Crossref] ,?[Google Scholar]
  60. McConville,?T.?(2006).?Devolved HRM responsibilities, middle-managers and role dissonance.?Personnel Review,?35,?637–653.?[Crossref] ,?[Web of Science ?] ,?[Google Scholar]
  61. McMullen,?T.,?Stark,?M., &?Jensen,?D.?(2007).?The role managers can play in reward program effectiveness.?Benefits & Compensation Digest,?5,?16–20.?[Google Scholar]
  62. Milllmore,?M.?(2003).?Just how extensive is the practice of strategic recruitment and selection??Irish Journal of Management,?24,?87.?[Google Scholar]
  63. Milmore,?M., et al. (2007).?Strategic human resource management: Contemporary issues.?Harlow:?Financial Times Prentice Hall.?[Google Scholar]
  64. Mindell,?N.?(1995).?Devolving training and development to line managers.?Management Development Review,?8,?16–21.?[Crossref] ,?[Google Scholar]
  65. Molleman,?E., &?Timmerman,?H.?(2003).?Performance management when innovation and learning become critical performance indicators.?Personnel Review,?32,?93–113.?[Crossref] ,?[Web of Science ?] ,?[Google Scholar]
  66. Mullins,?L. J.?(2007).?Management and organisational behaviour?(8th ed.).?Harlow:?Pearson Education.?[Google Scholar]
  67. Nehles,?A.,?van Riemsdijk,?M.,?Kok,?I., &?Looise,?J. K.?(2006).?Implementing human resource management successfully: A first-line management challenge.?Management Review,?256–273.?[Google Scholar]
  68. Nohria,?N.,?Joyce,?W., &?Roberson,?B.?(2003).?What really works.?Harvard Business Review,?42.?[Google Scholar]
  69. Paauwe,?J.?(2009).?HRM and performance: Achievements, methodological issues and prospects.?Journal of Management Studies,?46,?129–142.?[Crossref] ,?[Web of Science ?] ,?[Google Scholar]
  70. Pass,?S.?(2006).?The HR function: Today’s challenges, tomorrow’s direction.?[Google Scholar]
  71. People Management. (2001).?Managing motivation?[online]. Retrieved July 20, 2012, from.?[Google Scholar]
  72. Purcell,?J., &?Hutchinson,?S.?(2007).?Front‐line managers as agents in the HRM‐performance causal chain: Theory, analysis and evidence.?Human Resource Management Journal,?17,?3–20.?[Crossref] ,?[Google Scholar]
  73. Qadeer,?F.,?Shafique,?M., &?Rehman,?R.?(2011).?An overview of HR-line relationship and its future directions.?Journal of Business Management,?5,?2512–2523.?[Web of Science ?] ,?[Google Scholar]
  74. Rasmussen,?E.,?Andersen,?T., &?Haworth,?N.?(2010).?Has the strategic role and professional status of human resource management peaked in New Zealand??Journal of Industrial Relations,?52,?103–118.?[Crossref] ,?[Web of Science ?] ,?[Google Scholar]
  75. Redman,?T., &?Wilkinson,?A.?(2009).?Contemporary human resource management: Text and case?(3rd ed.).?Harlow:?Financial Times Prentice Hall.?[Google Scholar]
  76. Renwick,?D.?(2000).?HR-line work relations: A review, pilot case and research agenda.?Employee Relations,?22,?179–201.?[Crossref] ,?[Google Scholar]
  77. Renwick,?D.?(2003).?Line manager involvement in HRM: An inside view.?Employee Relations,?25,?262–280.?[Crossref] ,?[Google Scholar]
  78. Renwick,?D.,?Boswell,?W. R.,?Caligiuri,?P.,?Feldman,?D.,?Graham,?M. E.,?Guthrie,?J. P., …?Tansky,?J. W.?(2004).?HRM-the devolution revolution.?Human Resource Management?[online],?12,?27–29.?[Google Scholar]
  79. Roehling,?M.,?Boswell,?W. R.,?Caligiuri,?P.,?Feldman,?D.,?Graham,?M. E.,?Guthrie,?J. P., …?Tansky,?J. W.?(2005).?The future of HR management: Research needs and directions.?Human Resource Management,?44,?207–216.?[Crossref] ,?[Web of Science ?] ,?[Google Scholar]
  80. Saunders,?M.,?Lewis,?P., &?Thornhill,?A.?(2007).?Research methods for business students?(4th ed.).?Harlow:?FT Prentice Hall.?[Google Scholar]
  81. Thomson,?R., &?Thomson,?A.?(2012).?Managing people.?Routledge.?[Crossref] ,?[Google Scholar]
  82. Torrington,?D. P.,?Hall,?L. A., &?Taylor,?S.?(2005).?Human resource management?(6th ed.).?Harlow:?Pearson Education.?[Google Scholar]
  83. Torrington,?D.,?Hall,?L., &?Taylor,?S.?(2008).?Human resource management?(7th ed.).?Harlow:?Pearson education Limited.?[Google Scholar]
  84. Tubre,?T. C., &?Collins,?J. M.?(2000).?Jackson and Schuler (1985) revisited: A meta-analysis of the relationships between role ambiguity, role conflict, and job performance.?Journal of Management,?26,?155–169.10.1177/014920630002600104?[Crossref] ,?[Web of Science ?] ,?[Google Scholar]
  85. Truss,?C.,?Gratton,?L.,?Hope-Hailey,?V.,?Stiles,?P., &?Zaleska,?J.?(2002).?Paying the piper: Choice and constraint in changing HR functional roles.?Human Resource Management Journal,?12,?39–63.?[Crossref] ,?[Google Scholar]
  86. Truss,?C., &?Gill,?J.?(2009).?Managing the HR function: The role of social capital.?Personnel Review,?38,?674–695.?[Google Scholar]
  87. Ulrich,?D., &?Brockbank,?W.?(2005).?The HR value proposition.?Boston,?MA:?Harvard Business School Press.?[Google Scholar]
  88. Valverde,?M.,?Gerard,?R., &?Soler,?C.?(2006).?Distributing HRM responsibilities: A classification of organisations.?Personnel Review,?35,?618–636.?[Crossref] ,?[Web of Science ?] ,?[Google Scholar]
  89. Wai-Kwong,?F.,?Priem,?R., &?Cycyota,?C.?(2001).?The performance effects of human resource managers and other middle managers’ involvement in strategy making under different business-level strategies: The case in Hong Kong.?Human Resources Management,?12,?1325–1346.?[Taylor & Francis Online] ,?[Web of Science ?] ,?[Google Scholar]
  90. Whittaker,?S., &?Marchington,?M.?(2003).?Devolving HR responsibility to the line: Threat, opportunity or partnership??Employee Relations,?25,?245–261.?[Crossref] ,?[Google Scholar]
  91. Wright,?P. M., &?Nishii,?L. H.?(2007).?Strategic HRM and organizational behavior: Integrating multiple levels of analysis?(CAHRS Working Paper Series).?468.?[Google Scholar]
  92. Yin,?R.?(2004).?The case study anthology.?Thousand Oaks, CA:?Sage.?[Google Scholar]
  93. Zupan,?N., &?Kase,?R.?(2007).?The role of HR actors in knowledge networks.?International Journal of Manpower,?28,?243–259.10.1108/01437720710755236?[Crossref] ,?[Web of Science ?] ,?[Google Scholar]

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了