Crafting a High-Performing Virtual Team: A Deep Dive into Cross-Cultural Collaboration

In today's business world, the power of virtual teams can't be overstated.?

But building a cohesive, efficient, and high-performing virtual team, especially one that spans different cultures, is a challenge.?

Today, let me share a case study focused on an FMCG company, where cross-cultural collaboration played a pivotal role.?

Let's dive deeper into the 3 foundational elements that made this collaboration a resounding success.

1. Leadership: Hierarchical vs. Egalitarian

One element to consider in cross cultural collaboration is leadership style.?

It’s important to understand the difference between hierarchical style where you wait for permission and there is a big distance between manager and employee versus the egalitarian culture where there is almost no difference between manager and the employee; team members are expected to be proactive and make decisions on their own.

Our client’s team recognized the need for a balanced approach,

They opted for an egalitarian model during initial project phases. But once a project brief was solidified, they switched to a more hierarchical stance, ensuring clarity of direction.

2. Decision-making: Top-Down vs. Consensus

The second scale is all about decision making.?

How decisions are made can greatly affect the team's efficiency and cohesion.?

In places like the US, swift decision-making is the norm and often equated with strong leadership.?

On the other hand, countries like Germany lean towards a consensus-driven approach, taking time to ensure all stakeholders are consulted.

Our client’s team leaned more towards consensus.?

They believed that by including everyone in the decision-making process, execution would be more seamless and quick.

3. Confrontation and Conflict Resolution

The third scale deals with the confrontational scale or conflict scale.?

Cultural differences become especially evident in how teams handle conflicts.?

In many Asian cultures, direct confrontation can sometimes be perceived as a personal affront.?

In contrast, cultures like Germany and France promote direct, fact-based challenges to viewpoints without it reflecting on personal attributes.

For our client’s team, the optimal position was a slight tilt towards the confrontational side.?

This was a significant shift for team members from non-confrontational cultures but was essential for clear and direct communication.

Once these foundational aspects were established, the next step was crucial: living the chosen culture.?

This involved two key discussions:

Personal Commitment: Every team member had to make a personal commitment to live by the agreed-upon cultural norms, irrespective of how different they were from their own.

Leadership's Role: The team reflected on how their leaders could foster and facilitate the chosen culture.

The brilliance of this approach was that it didn't impose a culture from the top down.?

Instead, the team was involved in crafting their optimal working culture, and they held each other accountable to it.?

This peer accountability meant that external control became redundant.

With this harmonized and chosen culture in place, the company not only completed their ambitious project within the goal time but also reaped a net profit of 80 €.?

While other factors contributed to this success, the establishment of a cohesive virtual power team and the team commitment to live by it were undeniable enablers.

Remember that when building a high-performing virtual team, especially in a cross-cultural setting, understanding and navigating cultural differences is critical.?

When a team actively chooses its culture and commits to it, the results can be groundbreaking.

***

??The Team Potential Quiz. It’s a personalized assessment tailored for managers, decision-makers and HR professionals who are looking to maximize output and collaboration for their remote teams.

Completion Time: 45 seconds.

Start here: https://powerteams.scoreapp.com/