Top 20+ Covid Lab Breach Fails
Richard Rook
Dynamics GP Application and Administration Generalist, SharePoint, Microsoft pro
Misinformation Source - Fact Check
Pompeo - No evidence, intel came from Israeli - who was interviewed Jan 26th (China allied with Iran ) hunt cancelled .
Trump - No evidence, intel came from Pompeo
Li-Meng Yan - CNN article debunks papers , Pants on Fire on Politifact , only 17 connections on Linkedin, etc, etc
Matt Ridley debunked. Alina Chan also .. debunked by Angela Rasmussen..and Dr. Ben.
Nicholas Wade Article - Forbes article debunks his article and Medika puts it to shame . Larry Morgan puts it to rest. Snopes drives the last nail in.
3 ill WIV workers - No-one tested positive for antibodies (see Forbes article above). Few doctor offices in China so most go to the hospital . An Australian working there at the time asserts no one got Covid at the WIV.
Rand Paul gain of function - Can't create or test a mortality reduction from 15% (SARS) to 2% (COVID).?Forbes article above.
Leaked 2015 documents - Found the book on Amazon
Robert Redfield - No evidence, Trump appointee
Steve Bannon - No evidence, same intelligence as Pompeo. Backs Li-Meng Yan.
Michael R. Gordon - Author of Wall Street Journal “Wuhan lab” story wrote lies about Iraqi “Weapons of Mass Destruction”
Scientists say leak should not be ruled out?- Cite a CNN article that exposes a wet market delivery person as one of the first cases
"Scientists" want investigation - Political scientist who writes science fiction
WIV 280M from Market - actually 14KM, WCDC is 4KM away - 0 Citations
Steven Quay and Richard Muller - WSJ article debunked Then LA times debunks his Op Ed. Threw suspicion at Sept 17th 2021 Pasteur Institute Laos findings, using a common disinformation tactic of disproving bat to human transmission to support the lab leak theory.
领英推荐
Fauci not convinced zoonotic - Who could be? Doesn't mean he thinks it probably came from a lab.?
Epoch Times April 2020 Video - Assumes bat to human transmission, but that isn't likely since SARS is the only known coronavirus in bats that could do that, and is ~10x more deadly. More likely bat to animal to human. First human-to-human transmission was in the wet market, but we know a wet market delivery person was one of the first to be tested positive for COVID-19.
Databases offline - Security risk, system change in Sept 2019
Road closures in Oct - NBC article not found, reported from Taiwan
Cell reception outage - No causation detected
Former MI6 director - Retracted from MSM. See article below.
Norwegian Scientist - Financial interests exposed .?Chair of the pharmaceutical company Immunor. Wait, just like the Joker, he's back! Claiming four positively charged amino acids in a row isn't possible naturally. Debunked! And again. So far this has only been picked up by fringe media like the New York POST and FOX NEWS.
Deleted samples recovered by Jesse Bloom - samples were more likely from cell culture rather than patients
Tom Cotton - admits no evidence
Drastic investigation conclusions - debunked.
Not Lab Breach related, but worth mention:
Nathan Rich - Facial expression gives away wet market fib. Picks on CNN specifically for 3 ill WIV workers article, because CNN publishes leaked documents from China, thus more social media credits.
Portfolio Optimization @ OMV Petrom
3 年The lab leak theory is unlikely to be proven even if (with low probability) may be true. Unfortunately, this theory is heavily politicaly weaponized, it is difficult to diseminate fakes vs facts. Imho, there are (at least) two flaws of this approach: 1. The patient(s) zero hypothesis looks more like Adam and Eve as human origin assumption; I think that such a pandemic started with an infected population instead of an isolated cluster from the Wuhan lab; 2. The natural transmission from animal to human was happened before: Sars, Mers, H1N1, H3N2;
Delivery Excellence Techpoint Business Solution || Digital Transformation in Enterprises|| Tech for Biz Evangelist|| Nationalist ll Humanist ||#jenamusings||#tranxelideas
3 年Ok. If Lab leak theory is false, the natural migration theory is not proven as yet. Just a common sense says that 1. a proper investigation must happen. China ???? must not block anything 2. A strict surveillance mechanism must be ensured for any such projects like Function Gain It is very easy to discredit genuine doubts as conspiracy theory in social media under the pretext of science ??. Top scientists are now asking for proper scientific investigation , not a farce done by WHO. One can just denounce every such requirement as coming from some interested group. But that is a tag you give. That doesn’t take away the genuine need of humanity
Dynamics GP Application and Administration Generalist, SharePoint, Microsoft pro
3 年China uncensored is in the same league as NTD and Epoch Times. Discredit the CCP without regard to science or consequences.
Vice President, Corporate Audit
3 年https://youtu.be/8h2h3HNTnIc