COVID-19 Has Changed Credit Modeling Forever. Here’s How.
The full magnitude of COVID-19 on consumer credit is still incalculable, but here are seven ways credit modeling will evolve

COVID-19 Has Changed Credit Modeling Forever. Here’s How.

The full magnitude of COVID-19 on consumer credit is still incalculable. But one thing those of us who focus on consumer credit markets know for sure: the pandemic will change credit modeling forever. This week, strategic advisory firm Oliver Wyman convened an excellent panel of credit risk executives to discuss COVID-19’s impact on consumer financial services. Many of their insights aligned with what we’ve seen at Zest.ai, where we’ve been using machine learning to monitor consumer credit behavior as the pandemic hit and then spread.

Here’s a summary of the emerging consensus among credit risk professionals about COVID-19’s effect on consumer loan underwriting: 

  1. To effectively originate and restructure loans in today’s world, lenders need to recalibrate their risk scoresand even dramatic adjustments to business-as-usual models and policies may not be enough. Virtually no one had stress-tested their credit models for a downturn of this severity and speed, with unemployment levels spiking to 14% and GDP dropping 5% in a matter of weeks. Many forecasts expect economic activity to remain dramatically subdued even after we bend the COVID-19 curve. Given how fast the deterioration came, much of the resulting consumer credit distress has yet to show up in credit bureau data and many loans now in forbearance are still being reported as current by lenders. Even once consumer credit distress is more accurately represented in the data, the model development and governance processes inside most financial institutions are not equipped with the speed needed to adapt to what’s happening. (For this reason, lenders without sophisticated model monitors ought to treat their current model outputs with a high degree of skepticism for the foreseeable future.)
  2. Lenders who develop the ability to sort good borrowers from bad in turbulent times will take market share and, in the long run, enjoy more growth, profitability and customer loyalty. Most lenders are unable to finely parse risk in the event of global economic crises, particularly ones of this magnitude. As a result, we’ve seen many lenders stop originating entirely as they wait for recovery. This situation creates an opportunity for those lenders who use superior analytics and strong liquidity to gain market share by maintaining accuracy and staying agile no matter the market conditions.
  3. There are some obvious actions lenders can take to get a better handle on credit risk. These include: (a) Get more rigorous about income and employment verification through increased reliance on checking account data from vendors like Yodlee and Plaid and products like Equifax’s The Work Number; (b) focus on customers with savings and not those who live paycheck to paycheck; and (c) for auto and other asset-backed lenders, adjust your LTV ratios.
  4. The hardest task facing lenders today is determining whether and how to restructure loans in forbearance or default. Sorting the borrowers who’ve hit temporary economic stress from those who will never recover is very hard, in part because the data needed to validate most predictions isn’t available. Additionally, most lenders are set up to manage portfolios with low levels of defaults and lack the automation and rigorous analytics to quickly enhance their loss mitigation strategies when defaults surge. A typical call-center operation staffed by humans doing manual account reviews is unlikely to efficiently and effectively determine which borrowers deserve workouts and which don’t—lenders will need machine learning and automation to efficiently restructure defaulted loans at scale.
  5. Customers are likely to adjust their payment hierarchies. During the 2008 financial crisis, many borrowers were underwater on their homes, so for many it made financial sense to default on mortgages but continue to make auto and credit card payments. In the current crisis, borrowers are sheltering-in-place at home and not driving as much, so mortgage payments might get prioritized over auto. Credit card payments are also likely to be prioritized over auto payments since most borrowers need to shop for food and supplies while they stay home.
  6. Going forward, credit models will need to incorporate variables they haven't before. Together with the right math, more variables mean more accuracy and resilience in models. In a pandemic-prone world, important new data sources for credit models will include:
  • Checking account and other payment transaction data;
  • Unemployment forecasts (including possibly by geography and industry, though these types of variables can trigger fair lending issues);
  • COVID-19 transmission intensity rates (though once again, we’ll need to watch out for fair lending concerns—there's plenty of evidence that minorities are more adversely affected by COVID, so variables like this could conceivably raise red flags);
  • Variables related to other potential low-probability high-impact events like climate risk.

7. Lenders who can get AI credit models live quickly will have an edge. The days of credit models that use 15-20 variables, rely on elementary math and take over a year to get into production are long gone. The only way for lenders to thrive in this credit market is to use more data, better math, and tools that get models live quickly. Lenders who've automated key parts of the model development, validation, documentation and governance process will be able to react to changes in the marketplace faster than those who haven't. Meanwhile, advanced fair-lending testing and multivariable model monitoring will become the norm. AI tools will be needed to monitor input and output distributions, feature drift, anomalies and outliers, as well as other fairness measures like approval rate ratios in real-time. 

Those of us who work in credit risk may be heading back to offices and workplaces in the next few months, but the effects of COVID-19 on our jobs will be permanent. For lenders, a brave new world of credit modeling has already begun. If you’re interested to learn how the right AI model development, governance and monitoring tools can set lenders up for success in this new reality, please join my colleague Jay Budzik’s webinar on May 5, 2020 at 1pm PDT. As difficult as these times may be, COVID-19 presents lenders with an opportunity to accelerate their digital transformation and emerge well-positioned to win the future of consumer finance.

Alex Shenkar

Senior Model Validation Officer, SVP. All views expressed are my own.

4 年

I would agree that the full magnitude of COVID-19 impact on consumer credit is still unknown. It is too early to talk about solutions. There is no quick fix for today's modeling problems given a lack of default data and overarching government intervention. #1 You can’t recalibrate risk scores until you have actual default data which we don’t at the moment. #2 Ability to sort good borrowers from bad is fundamental for lending in any economy. In today’s environment, lenders will have to rely on credit strategy adjusted using mostly qualitative analysis and day-to-day surveillance of the market. Again, there is not enough default data that can be used for model development or recalibration. #3 Income data were always least reliable compare to the credit history. With the introduction of PPP, all income data sources are suspect.?It will take time to understand how recent income data can be used. The definition of “income” is evolving. #4 Loan restructuring and forbearance was almost always a manual process. There is not much that we can do from a quantitative perspective. #5 Payment re-prioritization is a natural reaction to the change in the microeconomic environment. #6 As far as new variables for models, model developers will usually test all available data sources for inclusion. Any info related to COVID-19 should be subject to in-depth analysis before it can be cleared for use. Today, we don’t even have a consistent nationwide methodology for the fatalities count… never mind counting the number of people who were infected. #7 Lenders who can get develop AI credit models quickly may or may not have an edge. AI is not a methodology but itself but a massive umbrella of dozens of methods and hundreds of variations. While I welcome ML (a subset of AI), pro and cons of each model and methodology should be objectively evaluated and benchmarked. There is no quick fix for today's problems given a lack of default data. Unequivocally, the priority of the day is to automate critical parts of the model development, validation, documentation, and governance process, reduce time-to-market and expenses.?However, let's not limit ourselves to a solution and keep our minds open.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Kareem Saleh的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了