COVID-19 Data – KEEP IT SIMPLE

COVID-19 Data – KEEP IT SIMPLE

There have been many posts attempting to draw control charts over COVID-19 data. Others try to fit polynomials to the data. I have even seen a Fourier analysis of COVID-19 data. Today, the computer has become an instrument of data torture. Rather than study the data, folk want to manipulate it.

Disease data is neither homogeneous nor independent. We know that people are infected by other people. The data each day depends on the data the day before. We could use a control chart as a test for homogeneity, but it is of no help.  https://www.qualitydigest.com/inside/operations-column/homogeneity-charts-090616.html

“If in doubt, start with a running record and histogram. Proceed only if additional analysis is needed.” - Dr Wheeler.

Sadly, these days most quality folk feel the running record, using run and bar charts is passé. You rarely see a histogram without it being hidden by a meaningless normal distribution drawn over it. The importance of histograms is now seldom taught.

“However, some data actually can be taken at face value, and all we need to do is to place it in context with a simple running record to understand what it is telling us. Some people are afraid of clarity because they fear that it may not seem profound.” – Dr Wheeler

We investigate the running record, the bar chart. We see that deaths (and new cases) increased rapidly and are now slowly decreasing.

“But what about all that noise in the data” you say.

We examine the “noise” and discover it isn’t noise at all. There is a low data point exactly every 7 days! Are fewer people dying on weekends? Is there better care on weekends? Is there worse reporting on weekends?

We also discover that there are fewer new cases on weekends. Are there fewer sick people reporting their illness on weekends? Is there less testing on weekends?

We need to investigate, using the data.

Examining Covid-19 data is a great example of how people try to complicate things and miss the message in the data. KEEP IT SIMPLE. If you are trying to use more than Professor Ishikawa’s tools, you are probably getting Quality wrong.

 

 

 

Dr Tony Burns

Q-Skills3D Interactive learning in Continual Improvement for all employees

4 年

CDC latest. “with deaths involving coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). For 6% of the deaths, COVID-19 was the only cause mentioned.” https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid_weekly/index.htm

回复
Daniel Martens

System Engineering Management Consultant (Ret)

4 年

Interesting that just a quick, not real time comparison, with the similar chart of new cases by day over the same time period shows the same low point on friday and saturday. The new cases chart shows a peak was reached on or about 5 April, two weeks before the peak in this death chart on or about 15 April. My guess on the dips would be that new cases by tests in commercial labs don't get done or reported on the weekends and tests in hospitals tend to be held till monday when the office crew comes back to work. Also, given the increase of testing starting in late April i suspect we are seeing more asymptomatic cases bringing the latter part of the chart numbers up over the earlier ones when only real reported cases were recorded. As you say, simple histograms often tell you more than charts where analysts try to find complication in simple data. Go where the useful information is and where you can look at cause and effect.

Daniel Lang

Practitioner & Promoter of the Shewhart/Deming Management Method (SPC/14 Points) and the System of Profound Knowledge

4 年

Dr. Burns, agree. And when it comes to data, garbage in, garbage out.

回复
Dr Tony Burns

Q-Skills3D Interactive learning in Continual Improvement for all employees

4 年

A strange run chart. Northeastern U.S. metropolitan area RED: smoothed primary sewage sludge SARS-CoV-2 virus RNA concentration BLACK: smoothed COVID-19 epidemiology curve (new cases) https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.05.19.20105999v1.full.pdf?fbclid=IwAR1341tlA99093z6JAAiUDZsJQNVZrxHcqeb9LWyxRM7Uz3gw7Sr_yPl7tM

  • 该图片无替代文字
回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Dr Tony Burns的更多文章

  • CONVERSATION with a SIX SIGMA EVANGELIST - PROFESSOR MONTGOMERY

    CONVERSATION with a SIX SIGMA EVANGELIST - PROFESSOR MONTGOMERY

    MONTGOMERY: “I stop well short of calling him a fraud” ME: Thank you for your reply. I’m sorry but you are mistaken.

    15 条评论
  • The Future of Quality

    The Future of Quality

    - Dr Tony Burns, BE (Hon 1) PhD (Chem Eng) Published in Quality Digest, Jan 13, 2022. "The Ghost of Quality Future".

    44 条评论
  • Quality 4.0

    Quality 4.0

    Why Change? Quality 4.0 is claimed to be the latest incarnation of Quality.

    102 条评论
  • A Tale of Two Minima

    A Tale of Two Minima

    There is much confusion around two key loss function minima, associated with Quality. The first is the very definition…

    90 条评论
  • Common Sense Before Computation

    Common Sense Before Computation

    Before reaching for a calculator, we should always first apply common sense. Our calculator may be very sophisticated…

    53 条评论
  • A Classic Quality Story

    A Classic Quality Story

    Dr Shewhart told this story to Dr David Chambers. Dr Chambers shared it with Dr Wheeler, and he with me, and so on to…

    54 条评论
  • The Big Lie - Six Sigma

    The Big Lie - Six Sigma

    I find it mind boggling that people believe massively blatant lies. I’m talking major nonsense, not just slight…

    10 条评论
  • The Mysteries of Six Sigma Stupidity

    The Mysteries of Six Sigma Stupidity

    It is no secret that Six Sigma has been the most destructive fad of all time. Of the 58 large companies that announced…

    25 条评论
  • Six Sigma Challenge

    Six Sigma Challenge

    The "six sigma" of Six Sigma is based on the claim by psychologist, Dr Mikel Harry, that the mean of ALL processes…

    9 条评论
  • Design of Experiments - DoE

    Design of Experiments - DoE

    Cookies in the Kitchen You’ve put Sunday afternoon aside to bake some cookies but you discover you have run out of…

    23 条评论

社区洞察