Counting Pennies.
This was written by a human. :)
Last week The Economist stuck a noteworthy pin in the artificial intelligence balloon.
The article? What happened to the artificial-intelligence revolution? noted that the technology has thus far brought no recognizable economic value to its users.
Makers of AI? As we all know, a different story. Roughly $2 trillion has been added to the market value of Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta, and Microsoft, a flood of venture capital ($142.3B in 2023) has washed into AI start-ups, and owners of Nvidia stock should have few complaints. ??
The Economist listed four reasons why the value needle has not – or not yet – moved for the enterprise: widespread concerns about data security, bias, and the accuracy of gen-AI output; ?widespread “pilotitis,” seen in a plague of small-scale, tech-centric Potemkin pilots – the equivalent of technology motion without business progress; small, limited scale implementations, most often in marketing and customer service, few of which will move the P&L.?
Add in a corporate hesitation that often accompanies rapid innovation; when, leaders ask, will the carousel of artificial intelligence slow enough so that we might jump on and invest in something that won’t be obsolete in six months?
All told, the rate of enterprise adoption is far slower – and with much less economic impact --? than McKinsey’s ?“The stage of AI in early 2024” report and Microsoft’s “2024 Work Trend Index Annual Report” might lead us to believe.? Indeed, The Economist article reported that the Goldman Sachs’ stock market index of firms that have “the largest estimated potential change to baseline earnings from AI adoption via increased productivity,” shows that the share prices of the high-potential firms have, since OpenAI’s ChatGPT launch in Q4 022, failed to outperform the broader market.
In other words, investors have seen no prospect of extra profits.
No prospect of extra profits.
To which I would say . . .
Not yet.
?
Time to take a deep breath and adjust expectations.
First: artificial intelligence is not a silver business bullet.
Yes, AI is amazing and it’s breakthrough and it is an inflection point – all true – but it is a set of tools that must be carefully integrated into multiple business processes to fulfill its promise. This will not come quickly nor simply.
?
As colleagues Milan Turk, Jr. and Don Bassell point out, the use of AI within a business will be a penny-in-every-pot play, one in which value creation will be a step-by-step accumulation of basis points throughout a business process. ?Over time, the value will grow, even multiply.
Thanks to the use of one or more AI tools, a process will be faster here and smarter there; it will deliver new insights and better decision options; it will help us know sooner and deeper.
It will re-shape not only this process, but that process. And that one. And that one.
In return: a penny here, a penny there; pennies, soon, everywhere.
?
The AI-in-Retail Research Group is now evaluating the potential, quantifiable value of artificial intelligence as applied in 141 standard retail industry workflows across eleven core business competencies. Our initial assessment would surprise few industry veterans: the application of AI to one single workflow will make no more than a small value difference, one barely felt by a line-item on the income statement.
领英推荐
However, the application of AI across a growing portion of the entire competency (for instance, store-level hiring and training) will, over time, create a significant, move-the-Goldman-index difference.
?
How much time?
Goldman Sachs has, with a broad brush, pointed to a measurable impact by 2027.?
For retailers, I’d say it depends.
I am aware of leading retailers who are collecting more than a few pennies right now. (In fact, several are multiplying pennies -- most often quietly, so that competitors are not tipped off.) ?I am aware of leading retailers who are now wisely preparing – through data preparation groundwork and strategic reviews – to begin collecting pennies late this year or early next.
But it depends.
It depends upon a brand’s willingness to invest in data quality and accessibility – knowing that AI is the refinery, and data is the oil. Internal and external data. Structured and unstructured data.
It depends upon a brand’s willingness to devote not only IT but business unit resources to the task, knowing that AI’s optimal value will not result from one-off solutions, but from workflow transformation. And that AI-enabled workflow transformation – the augmentation, acceleration and disruption of a business process, step by painful step -- will require expertise from BU leaders, operations, and HR as well as data architects, system architects, integrators, and UX designers.
It depends upon properly asserted expectations at senior levels. The conventional wisdom suggests that any all-stores technology roll-out will take 18-24 months from ideation to production implementation. The effective use of artificial intelligence tools in any one corner of the company – if pursued at an improve-the-business, not a Potemkin pilot level – will demand no less.
It depends upon a brand’s culture, its persistence and constancy to get stuff done – knowing, always, that the path will never be straight, regardless of the consultant’s marching chevrons slide. Kneejerk changes in leadership (and thus, direction and investment) will kneecap progress.
?
Message to London: for the enterprise, the AI revolution’s just begun.
?
?
?
?
?
I am Jon Stine, 35+ years in retail business and technology. Most recently in conversational AI.
I read, I listen, I observe. I think, I write, I advise.
?+1 503 449 4628.
.NET Maui, Blazor, and more
2 个月Good points Jon. I am more on the "practitioner side" these days. My clients are being quite deliberate about AI and what it means to their businesses.
Author, Speaker, Strategic Advisor / Helping retail prepare for a future arriving sooner than expected
2 个月It is certainly early days for AI in retail but what's concerning is the growing gap between AI implementations and focus by the largest retailers and all others. Those leveraging AI are already beginning to create a growing performance gap vs their slower moving competitors. And AI is a classic example of first-mover advantage as companies moving early and aggressively in their use of AI will advance further and faster than their competitors.
Store Operations Council members look forward to AI co-pilots that can help them create actionable insights from the avalanche of data that is sent to store managers every day. They expect great results that are easily quantifiable.
Good points Jon. I find the early days of the Internet a good analogy. I recall debating (almost violently) with my boss at the time that we needed to move our enterprise from Compuserve to the "Internet" and get a Website going ASAP. His response was that the Internet was a fad at best and no enterprise would ever sacrifice the security, reliability and support of a commercially run platform like Compuserve to an open free-for-all network like the "Internet". AI is the new paradigm from which everything should be reimagined, however human nature dictates that the fear of loss is greater than the appetite for gain. Thus, asymmetrical performance won't likely be seen by legacy enterprises adopting AI, but rather whole new enterprises spawned from an AI-first approach. Exhibit A from my Internet analogy would be Barnes and Noble and Amazon. QED
I help CEOs and Marketers understand how AI can work for their brands and teams | Innovation Strategist | AI Consultant | Author | Speaker
2 个月While I would argue that individuals are gaining value from AI, I do agree it’s still early-ish days for organizations. This is for all the “it depends” reasons but also because AI isn’t a magic wand so it takes time to plan, prep, and implement meaningfully. There is penny-counting and saving happening. However, like other revolutions, this one isn’t always televised. So while it’s tempting to tell oneself, the revolution is just getting started, it really is time to get started.