Could "Context"? be the New King?

Could "Context" be the New King?

In January 1996, Bill Gates wrote an essay titled “Content is King”, which was published on the Microsoft website. He began by saying:

“Content is where I expect much of the real money will be made on the Internet, just as it was in broadcasting.”

Needless to say, he was correct, as evidenced by the massively profitable businesses formed by media giants from Facebook to Viacom who heeded this business acumen.

So what has changed? Well the truth is cloud computing and advanced data analytics tools have finally created a real challenge to content’s seemingly unchallengeable position as king of the castle. By providing a new reference set to help businesses better understand how one customer’s actions or outcomes compare to those of a larger population, context can be a source of incremental new value for both businesses and customers.

During our leadership program Accelerating Digital Leadership, based on Professor David L. Rogers’ best-seller The Digital Transformation Playbook, we study Nike+, an online community that lets customers capture their running data and compare their performance to other members of the Nike+ community. Supported by consumers’ increasing interest in diet, exercise, heart rates, sleep patterns and other markers, the Nike+ platform started out as a simple shoe sensor customers could link to their Apple iPod to monitor their performance, but rapidly evolved into a global runner community and website collecting data from millions of runners around the world.

Nike customers who track their running data don’t just want to know how they did today; they also want to know how today’s performance compares to their own performance over the last week or month, to the goals they have set, and to the activity of friends in their social network. The ability to compare their own data with the data of others adds additional value by helping customers understand the probabilities of different outcomes. Context is king.

But Nike isn’t the only company moving beyond content to context. Naviance is a software platform for American college hopefuls. One of its services allows students to upload transcript results and compare them to Naviance’s database of other students who have applied to the same schools. The result is a ranking of the student’s probability of being accepted at their top choices.

BillGuard is another example of a firm using context to drive greater value. This popular financial protection app tracks its customers’ credit card statements and helps identify both fraudulent billing (e.g., whether or not the card was one of the 50 million hacked in the latest cyberscandal) as well as “grey” charges (hidden fees customers likely weren’t aware they were being charged). The firm’s algorithms are effective precisely because they compare a customer’s bills against the anonymized bills of peers and against whatever charges may have been flagged as questionable by other customers in its community.

So, as we begin 2019, which really is king? In the ongoing quest for dominance of the Internet, perhaps my claim that context could be the new king is simply too bold. After all, content has ruled for quite a while, remaining almost impenetrable in its dominance.

Until you compare it to something else—then it becomes really valuable.

_________________________________________

The content for this article is drawn from CX Workout’s Accelerating Digital Leadership program which is based on the book: The Digital Transformation Playbook—Rethink Your Business for the Digital Age by David L. Rogers

Want to learn more? Visit us at www.cxworkout.com/digital-leadership/.

Enjoyed the article. Data is only as good as you use it and context helps point you in the right direction. Thanks for posting, Joe!

回复

Thanks, for your well-written piece, Joe -- context really does animate the data.

回复
Phil Rubin

Founder @ Grey Space Matters | Speaker | Board Member | Advisor | Connector

6 年

Good examples Joe and agree that context is increasingly essential, as it drives relevance. ?What is contextually relevant for a customer varies greatly one day to the next, one brand to the next, and one brand interaction to even the next one with the same brand. ?We're a long way away from many brands understanding and pursuing this but the leaders like Nike certainly are.

回复
Barron T. Evans

CPEX Change Consultant / Catchafire.org Leader / Distinguished Alumni Award Recipient / ESL Tutor / Board(s) Member

6 年

If you look at the 'real' (vs. ether) world, context has always been a cornerstone. Just witness last weekend's event at the Lincoln Memorial ... and all the spin since. Like platforms, perceptions will always change ... based on context.

Terry Cain

Author, Co-Owner at Pinwheel Partners

6 年

Nice and pithy Joe. As you know, our experience dictates that "Culture is the most powerful asset of any organization. The CX industry has worked diligently to bring or retrain cultures to become (Pick your term customer centric, obsessed, focused, valued, engaged, or loyal) I am sure I missed a few. ?As we dig into culture at the highest level working to inspire leaders that being intentional about their cultures, knowing the values expressed and unexpressed in behaviors, we find a big void in experience. Hierarchies like to delegate and forget. Culture makes it "in your face" at every turn, holds you true like bumper bowling so the strike of purpose is a clear target for every employee. I will be thinking more about the macro of context within the context of culture and I believe a periodic assessment focuses on the point in time for what is needed now as perceived by the many not the few at the top and forces a context snapshot. ?Thanks for the post!

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Joe Wheeler的更多文章

  • Does 'digital first' mean 'people second'?

    Does 'digital first' mean 'people second'?

    Does ‘digital first’ mean ‘people second’? Of course not. People are never second.

    28 条评论
  • Do immersive experiences improve the bottom line?

    Do immersive experiences improve the bottom line?

    The fact of the matter is, when it comes to truly immersive experiences, customers won’t necessarily tell you they want…

    2 条评论
  • Does giving customers more choice mean losing control?

    Does giving customers more choice mean losing control?

    At face value, you might think providing customers choice could seem like a hot mess of confusion and complexity. And…

    6 条评论
  • Are digital ecosystems the new competitive battleground?

    Are digital ecosystems the new competitive battleground?

    This is a tricky question, because in some ways it depends on the competitive landscape of your industry, however, with…

    5 条评论
  • Is personalization becoming table stakes?

    Is personalization becoming table stakes?

    Google research reports that 63% of people expect brands to tailor experiences based on their preferences. It is fair…

    4 条评论
  • Do we really have to ask customers if they are happy?

    Do we really have to ask customers if they are happy?

    I hope this question inspires a healthy discussion given the wide acceptance of solutions to capture customers’…

    2 条评论
  • Will machine learning 'eat the world'?

    Will machine learning 'eat the world'?

    I am obviously riffing off Marc Andreessen famous 2011 newsletter explaining ‘Why Software is Eating the World.” You…

    2 条评论
  • How to Bring CX Journey Mapping to Life with Video

    How to Bring CX Journey Mapping to Life with Video

    The process of visualizing the experience of interacting with your brand from the customer’s point of view was added to…

  • The One Problem You Must Solve: How You Solve Problems

    The One Problem You Must Solve: How You Solve Problems

    It was fascinating to watch. We had assigned four teams of senior leaders with two challenges.

    3 条评论
  • Why Platforms Always Win

    Why Platforms Always Win

    Platform business models are springing up faster than lemonade stands on a hot summer weekend. Why is this? Is there…

    4 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了