The Cost of Doing Nothing

The Cost of Doing Nothing

I went down to a local electronics shop to buy a specific device the other day. Their website listed three in stock, but when I got to the shop, I couldn't find any. I found an employee and asked about it. Here is how customer service works in this chain of stores:

  1. Employee goes to the public-facing website to find the device
  2. Employee tries to memorize the model code
  3. Employee goes into the actual inventory system, which has a nice retro look with green monospace characters on black background
  4. Employee mistypes the model code and finds nothing
  5. Employee goes back to the website
  6. Employee fumbles for a mouse, finds one, and copies the model code from the website
  7. Employee pastes the model code into the inventory system
  8. Employee regrets to inform the potential customer that the device is not really in stock.
  9. Potential customer leaves the store and buys from a competitor

Let's have a look at what this costs in lost business:

  • Assume this store has about 700 customers/day
  • Assume 2% has this experience. That's 14 angry customers per store per day
  • Assume average customer spend is $500/year
  • Assume customer remembers bad experience for three years
  • Thats $1,500 in lost turnover per customer
  • Assume a 2% profit margin (consumer electronics is a tough business). That's $30 lost profit per angry customer
  • There are 14 angry customers per day per store. That's about 5,000 angry customers per store per year. That's $150K in lost profit per store
  • There are 40 stores in this chain (I'm in Denmark, things are smaller here). That's $6M lost per year

And let's not forget the wasted employee time:

  • Assume each employee serves 35 customers/day
  • Based on observation, it takes 3 minutes to make a customer angry
  • That's approx 100 counterproductive minutes per employee per day
  • Assume an employee costs $60 an hour with sick days, benefits etc (we're in high-wage, high-tax Denmark)
  • That's approx $100 lost per employee per store per day
  • With 10 front-line customer service employees per store that's $1,000 lost per day or $360K per year per store
  • That's about $14M lost per year across the 40 stores in the chain

The cost of not integrating these two systems is thus around $20M per year.

There are intangible costs as well, for example customers who will bad-mouth the company to all their friends and on social media, and unhappy employees faced with irate customers.

When building a business case, list each assumption so it can be challenged. Maybe there are 1,000 customers per day per store. Maybe an item is only missing in 1% of cases. Discuss the numbers with the business and calculate the total loss in money. The business doesn't understand that you want to implement an Event-Driven Architecture with Apache Kafka. The business does understand that they are losing $20M per year.

An IT organization that cannot calculate value like this will be considered a cost like building maintenance. An IT organization that can calculate business value becomes a trusted partner.


This post originally appeared in the Technology That Fits newsletter. Don't miss the next one, sign up.

Hamish Mackenzie

Go-to-Market Advisor to Industrial Tech Start-ups, Scale-ups & SMBs ? Event & Workshop Moderator ? Advisory Board Member ? Certified Stakeholder-centered Coach ? Gen AI for Marketing Integrator

4 年

Did you send this to the CEO of the store in question? If not, you should. If he's got any sense, he will call you the same day to see how much more money you can save him!

回复

Sten, I think you should multiply 3 minutes by 14 customers and not 35. Of course dividing by the number of full day employee equivalents per store ??

回复
Sanjay Chaudhary

Head of Enterprise Marketing @ SAP I ex-Intellect Design I ex-Lentra I ex-Oracle | ex-American Express | DemandGeneration | Industry Marketing | ABM | Sales Strategy & Programs | Marathon Runner

5 年

Very nice article Sten and clear demonstration of how small errors can pileup to make huge erosion.

回复
Andre van Dalen

Maak leven, werken & organisaties beter & leuker! 5xA: ??Ambition ??Aim ?Achieve ??Appreciate ??Amplify!

5 年

Excellent article Sten! And let’s not forget the investments probably made in some systems to try to solve this in each silo application. Integration is key! We call IT #Synergise nowadays at AMIS

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Sten Vesterli的更多文章

  • Price Transparency

    Price Transparency

    An American friend of mine went to get tested for coronavirus together with his wife. He went to a hospital covered by…

    1 条评论
  • Blaming the Humans

    Blaming the Humans

    A Danish frigate accidentally launched a Harpoon missile back in the 1980s. It was an accident that couldn't happen.

  • Wasting Money

    Wasting Money

    This week's episode of my podcast Beneficial Intelligence is about wasting money. The business always complains that IT…

  • Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence

    Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence

    Newspapers are fending off a flurry of press releases from companies eager to reassure shareholders that they are not…

    2 条评论
  • Agile is not just for IT

    Agile is not just for IT

    IT professionals have struggled valiantly for many years to spread agile principles outside of IT, but with very…

  • The Robots are Here (and they are Clueless)

    The Robots are Here (and they are Clueless)

    Last week, I read the amazing true story of what happened when Dave Meslin tried to order boxes from Amazon. He ordered…

  • IT is the Second Line of Defense

    IT is the Second Line of Defense

    In a health emergency, healthcare workers are the first line of defense. These people face a crushing workload…

    11 条评论
  • Amateurs and Professionals

    Amateurs and Professionals

    How hard can it be to gather 1777 data records? As events in Iowa show, surprisingly difficult. As an IT professional…

    1 条评论
  • Another Deadly?Boeing Design Error

    Another Deadly?Boeing Design Error

    It turns out that the defective thinking behind the two deadly 737 MAX 8 crashes started killing people more than a…

    8 条评论
  • Goodbye, Oracle

    Goodbye, Oracle

    In aviation, there is a type of accident known as Controlled Flight into Terrain. It means that a perfectly good…

    54 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了