The Cost of Delayed Reporting – A Comparative Look at Deshaun Watson’s Allegations

?

The cases against NFL quarterback Deshaun Watson reveal the profound costs of delayed reporting in sexual assault cases. Comparing the first victim’s allegations against Watson with the more recent 2024 claims by "Jane Doe" highlights both the similarities and escalation in Watson’s alleged behavior and raises crucial questions about the societal and legal implications of delayed reporting.

?

The First Victim: A Missed Opportunity for Early Action

?

The first known civil case against Watson, filed in 2020, detailed allegations of sexual assault during a massage session. The plaintiff claimed that Watson exhibited inappropriate behavior, escalating from suggestive comments to physically inappropriate contact. This initial case, which was one of the first in what would become a cascade of allegations, focused primarily on Watson’s conduct during a session that crossed professional boundaries. The plaintiff alleged that Watson's actions were unexpected and that his behavior violated the norms of a massage therapy session. The lawsuit was filed in Harris County, Texas, and set the stage for further accusations from over two dozen women.

?

Had this first victim come forward immediately after the incident, the course of events might have been drastically different. Delayed reporting allowed Watson to continue his conduct without immediate repercussions, leading to multiple similar accusations. The 2024 allegations show a marked escalation in Watson's behavior, indicating that earlier intervention could have potentially prevented further harm to additional victims.

?

The 2024 Allegations: An Escalation of Behavior

?

In the new civil suit filed in September 2024, the pattern of behavior is disturbingly similar but with an even greater degree of aggression and violence. In this case, Watson is accused of sexually assaulting Jane Doe after arranging a meeting through a mutual acquaintance. Watson allegedly became aggressive when he couldn't find Jane Doe's apartment, later stripping naked without warning and demanding a massage. When Jane Doe hesitated and tried to deflect, Watson escalated his actions into a brutal sexual assault.

?

The similarities between this case and the earlier allegations are striking. In both instances, Watson is accused of using his physical presence and social power to manipulate and control his victims. However, in the 2024 case, the aggression is much more overt, with Watson allegedly verbally abusing the victim before the assault and physically overpowering her. This shift suggests an escalation in Watson's behavior, possibly fueled by the absence of immediate legal consequences following the earlier reports.

?

Similarities and Escalation in the Pattern of Assault

?

Both the earlier and later accusations follow a pattern: Watson meets a woman under ostensibly professional or personal circumstances, and then unexpectedly shifts the dynamic into something sexual and inappropriate. In both cases, the victims describe feeling trapped and powerless, unsure how to respond to Watson's advances without risking their own safety. What differs is the level of aggression and physicality. In the first victim's account, Watson's actions are inappropriate but initially non-violent. By 2024, Watson allegedly uses physical force, indicating an escalation in his behavior.

?

This pattern of escalation is not uncommon in cases of sexual assault, where unchecked behavior often becomes more extreme over time. Without early intervention, perpetrators may become emboldened, testing boundaries until they eventually cross into more overt acts of violence. The delayed reporting in Watson’s case allowed this cycle to continue, with each new incident carrying more severe consequences for the victims.

?

The Cost of Delayed Reporting

?

The cost of delayed reporting is profound and multifaceted. For the victims, delaying their report means that they continue to live with the trauma of the assault, often compounded by the knowledge that other women may suffer the same fate. Jane Doe, for example, stated that she was initially hesitant to come forward after seeing how previous accusers were treated by Watson’s legal team and the public. This fear of public retaliation is a common reason why survivors delay reporting, but it also prolongs their emotional suffering and allows the perpetrator to continue their behavior unchecked.

?

For Watson, the consequences of delayed reporting are financial and reputational. His 2022 suspension cost him $632,000 in lost game earnings, and he was fined $5 million. However, these penalties came long after the initial accusations, and further cases continue to arise. Had the first victim reported Watson's conduct immediately and had legal action been taken earlier, it is possible that the damage to his career—and to the lives of the additional victims—could have been mitigated.

?

The Crucial Need for Early Reporting and Intervention

?

The cases against Deshaun Watson illustrate the ripple effects of delayed reporting in sexual assault cases. Early intervention, particularly in the case of the first victim, might have prevented the escalation of Watson’s behavior and saved future victims from enduring similar or worse experiences. While there are many valid reasons why victims delay coming forward—fear of retaliation, humiliation, and the public’s judgment—there is also a significant cost when perpetrators are allowed to continue their actions unchecked.

?

The similarities between the first and latest allegations against Watson reveal a disturbing pattern that might have been interrupted had action been taken sooner. This case underscores the importance of creating a supportive environment where victims feel empowered to report misconduct without fear of retaliation or public shaming. Only by addressing sexual assault in its earliest stages can we hope to prevent the kind of escalation seen in Watson’s case.