The Cost of Crisis

The Cost of Crisis

What does it cost to replace a manufacturing plant? How about a flagship store? Fight a lawsuit? How much does it cost to restore your reputation??

These are often the questions we ask when asked why protecting your organization’s reputation is a worthwhile investment. We’re asked to put a price on crisis. We are asked to compare the cost of crisis preparedness to the potential losses of a crisis?

And here is the answer to the question — restoration is a heck of a lot more expensive than protection. Just like installing a smoke detector in your home is a lot less expensive than rebuilding your home, preparing for a crisis is pennies on the dollar compared to what you will need to restore your reputation.??

Whether it’s disruption to your business that affects the bottom line, the cost of lawsuits or fines, or damage to your reputation, eroding your position in the market, crises have a cost.?According to lawyer Michael Volkov?“a company’s reputation and its culture as its most significant intangible asset, pricing it as roughly 30 to even 40 percent of the stock’s value.?If you put this in concrete terms, 40 percent of the company’s current capitalization reflects its reputation and its culture.”?And although businesses are understandably reluctant to share the specifics of their losses, you can see the effects every day by scanning the business section of any newspaper or website.

So the question we often ask ourselves is, ‘Why is it so hard to get companies to invest in preparation?’

It appears that the adage that ‘prevention is better than cure’ only applies when there’s no money at stake. In my experience, there are three main reasons.

Firstly, there’s the difficulty of proving a negative. If you prevent a crisis from happening, and doing damage, how can you prove that your investment was worth it? It’s easy to cite instances when something occurred, but, as Sherlock Holmes reminds us, sometimes the significant thing is when the dog doesn’t bark. And, ironically,?the more successful your program is in preventing things from occurring, the greater the likelihood that people think the root problems have gone away and demand that the budget be cut.

The second issue is that there is a misconception that it is cheaper and easier to deal with a crisis than prevent one. The cost of even the most detailed and comprehensive preparedness program will be dwarfed by the cost of lost orders, regulatory fines and legal settlements, not to mention the cost of responding to the crisis.?

Not willing to take my word for it? The folks at?Pew cite $6 of damage prevention for every dollar invested in disaster mitigation. That might not be the number for everyone – for some it will be even higher.?

So while it’s certainly easier to pay up afterward, it’s definitely not cheaper. We know.

Finally, there is the intangible damage that will take an even longer time to repair with untold costs – trust with your customers; commitment from your employees and confidence from your board. The hit to your reputation affects all aspects of your business. Looking to go public? Reputation matters. Looking to merge and get regulator approval? Reputation matters.?

So I know being prepared, preventing a crisis and protecting your reputation matters. You know it matters so how to make the case within your company?

Like with many other things, we can help.

The first thing we’ve seen that’s effective is to?equate preparedness programs with insurance. Every business will have insurance and an acceptable ratio between the cost of insurance and the value of the insured assets. Again, this is probably pennies on the dollar. So when you equate the equivalent cost of the preparedness program to what you’re protecting, the costs are minuscule: it’s?hundredths?of pennies on the dollar. You can argue that a preparedness program is the cheapest form of insurance you’ll get!

In addition to the financial benefits, you can also show the reputational benefits. Living your values directly impacts your reputation and place in the market, so it’s good for your bottom line.?But it also means that there’s a well of goodwill available for when things do go wrong.?That goodwill buys you valuable time and space in the first few vital moments of a crisis which can be the difference between an effective response and a downward spiral.

Again, preparedness is about more than simply teaching people what to do when things go wrong.

The final benefit of preparation is that this will often help you identify preventable risks that can be addressed and reduced. For example, running people through a series of simulations of what could happen not only means that they’re better able to respond to that event, but they might also identify ways to prevent those situations from occurring in the first place. These mitigation or preventative measures will reduce your overall risk environment. That’s particularly important for strategic or preventable risks, that is, risks that have occurred either because of a decision that you made or something that you failed to do.?

And to again return to the cost of preparedness compared to the value of the business or the potential lost revenue, even a robust preparedness program that costs tens of thousands of dollars is pocket change.?

Now, the more cynical reader might see this as a pitch for business from a company specializing in this kind of work. And it’s true: running exercises, preparing teams, and ensuring that organizations are ready for a crisis is a primary focus of Kith’s work.?

However, our income from preparation is significantly lower than the invoice that follows a 3 a.m. call to assist a team that’s already in trouble. So, if there were a financial angle here, we’d be encouraging people not to prepare!?

Being called in as firefighters is financially much more lucrative. (And honestly,?more stimulating.) However, we base our success on the number of phone calls we don’t get: not hearing the dog bark is a measure of success!

So if you’re ever faced with the question?‘How much will it cost us to prepare for this kind of event?’, I hope you now feel better able to give a credible, robust answer.

But the best approach is sometimes to turn the question around and ask,?‘What will it cost if we don’t prepare?’

That’s going to bring things into sharp relief for whoever allocates the budget – and attention – of your organization. And, when you compare the cost of preparation with the potential cost of inaction, your preparedness program will seem like a bargain.

Photo by?Evergreens and Dandelions?on?Unsplash

?

Don Heymann

Writer, editor, communications advisor and writing coach. You and your organization will benefit from clear, persuasive communications. Let’s have a conversation.

2 年

Great information and insights, Stephanie. But why am I only seeing this piece 4 months after you posted?

回复
Matt Maruca, LLB, MCM, APR

Business leader providing strategic & multi-disciplinary counsel

3 年

Great article Stephanie Craig! Great insights! One aspect some companies fail to consider is the opportunity a crisis presents. If a company is well prepared for a crisis when one inevitably hits, they can show their stakeholders how in-touch and authentic they are with a quick and effective response. It can actually help distinguish that company from its competitors thereby helping to attract customers and goodwill. Crisis is often a great time to grow but the company must be prepared!

Susan L Blumberg, PhD

Parenting and Family Coach at Dr Susan Coaching/ I partner with parents to help teens and young adults to improve their communication , structure and organization to achieve harmony in your lives.

3 年

being proactive is always more cost-effective than being reactive! Thanks for the clear explanation.

Jill Gerber

Newspaper reporter by training and five years in the field. U.S. House/Senate communications director/speechwriter by doing. Lifelong fan of well-chosen words and their power to inspire and inform.

3 年

Invaluable points. This planning should (and surely does?) include CEOs and their use of social media and internal communications. A few CEOs lately have caused a lot of reputational damage to the companies they lead with intemperate posts.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Stephanie Craig的更多文章

  • Gutting Comms is not Worth the Risk

    Gutting Comms is not Worth the Risk

    I’ve watched over the last couple of days and weeks as countless friends have lost their jobs in tech. Most of them…

    4 条评论
  • Crisis - Gone but Not Forgotten

    Crisis - Gone but Not Forgotten

    The damage of a crisis is not always immediate and not always front-page news. A couple of months ago, CTV News/Bell…

    6 条评论
  • Clarity is Critical When Preparing for Social Risks

    Clarity is Critical When Preparing for Social Risks

    2022 is still looking a lot like 2021. With one added twist - 2022 has the added excitement of Congressional elections,…

    10 条评论
  • National Journal is now on Medium!

    National Journal is now on Medium!

    National Journal has launched our presence on Medium, Rotunda: The Insider's Guide to Navigating Washington. Rotunda…

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了