Are corporate purpose & values statements serious, silly, or a sham?
thanks to Gerd Altmann & Pixabay for the trust jigsaw

Are corporate purpose & values statements serious, silly, or a sham?

The worst hospital I’ve ever had to deal with was so proud of its purpose and values it blazoned them across every surface from the website to the tiles in the foyer: Deliver Excellent Health Outcomes, Outstanding Experience of Care, Outstanding Experience for Their People, and Be a Sustainable Organisation, Visibly Reassuring, Clearly Communicating, Actively Respectful and Positively Welcoming.

My experience as a patient was that they did nothing to treat my health problems and little to care for me. They failed to honour appointments, they got my medications wrong, they ghosted my queries and accused me of being non-compliant when I raised concerns. They showed little politeness and less kindness. Their bathrooms were filthy and their staff disengaged. Luckily, I was able to transfer to a different hospital that restored my faith in the healthcare system, and sorted my problems with swift effectiveness and warm humanity.

Does this story reveal that corporate purpose and values are worthless? Or does it show how much it matters to get them right? Here’s my professional and personal conclusion, and how I arrived at it, in a less than 5 minute read...

The case for sham

Goodness knows it’s easy to mock statements of purpose and value. Too many are crafted from corporate-speak that nobody uses in real life (championing, shape the future, unrivalled).?Too many are vague to the point of incomprehension (what does Raise the Bar mean, Thames Water??Lead the Way, Deloitte?). And too many come over as preachily insincere (I’m not sure that Compassion would be the first word I associate with the UK Home Office, or Integrity the stand-out value of Enron) as well as disassociated from what the organisation actually does (How does Yum Brands, a fast food conglomerate, Make the World Better? How does being Bold improve your housebuilding, Barratt?).

But I don’t think we react so strongly to bad purpose statements because they are clumsily put together – nobody expects poetry from corporate marketing. I think our problem is that these statements speak cheaply to things we hold dear: the why of what people do, and how far they are willing to go in pursuit of that mission. A customer relationship may not be a marriage, but it is not a transaction either – it is people dealing with people, and we need at least some level of trust in all our dealings.

The real challenge

We trust people when they are straight with us and when they show they care about what we think or feel. We see people as trust-worthy when they have a two-way conversation with us rather than giving a fancy speech, when they talk about real things not theories, when they are realistic and open, even if that exposes them personally or risks making them look ridiculous. We trust them when they listen more than they talk, when their actions embody their words.

It’s the commitment that counts: if you are not sure whether you have it in your organisation, ask yourself: ?What have we sacrificed for our purpose or values?

If you and your colleagues struggle to come up with a big, real example, perhaps you have work to do...

So, how do I get purpose and values right?

Full disclosure: defining an organisation's purpose and values is hard, resource-intensive, long and difficult work.

This is not a task you can delegate to consultants, or tick off a meeting to-do list, or sort via a half-day session at the whiteboard – and you definitely can’t get there by prompting ChatGPT! Purpose and values statements need to come from a series of deep, intimate, reflective and exposing conversations together as an organisation about what matters, how much, and how capable and how willing you are to deliver on that promise. And you yourselves need to write it, in your own language. This takes time, resources, effort and dedication. It will only work if the result is genuinely a product of you as an organisation coming together, committing to what matters most to you, expressed in your own words.

Why bother?

Because purpose and values make your organisation real to your customers, employees and stakeholders, and if you neglect them you are cutting out your corporate heart, lungs and nervous system. If you take purpose and values seriously, you will find that the process of defining them acts as a catalyst for organisational transformation. In the deep conversations I outlined above, you will interrogate your strategy and your operations more rigorously than ever before, you will get to know your colleagues, suppliers and customers more intimately than you imagined (and they will get to know you too!), you will understand better in all kinds of ways how your people work, what they do, what they care about most, their strengths and weaknesses and aspirations and fears.

You will come together as an organisation, with a new sense of energy, focus and belonging – and that strength will show, my experience with clients tells me and independent research confirms, in your financial results, in your long-term resilience and growth, in your evolution with and for your customers, and in your growing reputation as a great place to work, where people do great work.

Conclusion: purpose & values are serious, not sham

I know every leadership team is overburdened and braced for shocks right now, and nobody in their right mind wants to take on extra work. But getting serious about purpose and values is no nice-to-have but an essential that delivers more bang for buck than any other business intervention, and transforms people - even top executives - in the process.

May it do so for you.

Great, thought-provoking, article Fionnuala. And yet, no one has taken this opportunity to share their values; which is interesting.

Pam Kennett

OD Consultant | L&D | Coach and Mentor | Chartered FCIPD | BPS registered | MSc | MBA

10 个月

Great post and it occured to me that the organisations you included really missed opportunities to help define themselves and their role in the world. Why can't Yum Foods 'consistently produce delicious food our customers love'. Or Thames Water 'provide clean water without harming the environment'. Maybe that's just too simple. I remember working for Heathrow at some point when our values were clean, working and efficient. Seemed to say it all and tick most boxes. At its best. organisation purpose can be a helpful part of the employee branding proposition but at its worst can be used to recruit a bland and generic workforce.

Simple test I apply is ‘would anyone claim the opposite?’ Eg if I see an statement that says “our value is integrity?’ I wonder ‘who would value deceit?’ If no one would claim the opposite then the statement is empty at best. Second test was one I got from Fons Trompenaars at TROMPENAARS HAMPDEN-TURNER when he rightly points out that stated org values tend to be aspirations for things we don’t have. So I always ask ‘how worried should I be?’ Eg if an org says we value integrity what will the impact of their implied deceit be on me? Third and last test is ‘is this precise enough’. Eg we want to make the world a better place is a great goal but, as you rightly point out in the article, the question is ‘how exactly does what you do help achieve the goal’. If you can’t explain it then forget it. I worry that, blinded by the fashionable search for “why”, too many leaders fail to see that the best representation of what, how and why is, in fact, a venn diagram rather than concentric circles.

Dr. Peter Crow

Helping boards govern with impact

10 个月

I favour this mindset: ? Purpose: A summary statement of ‘what and so what’. A pragmatic expression of what drives us, over the longer-term. It must be realistically achieveable :) ? Values: four or five words that express ‘the way we roll’, which form the basis for behaviour standards and approach to decision-making. (Note: we roll, a collective expression of and about people, not the company) Sadly, these terms have been captured by some (many?), and they have been politicised and weaponised in an attempt to enforce a particular worldview on companies. Thus, one must proceed with caution.

Christian Hayes FRSA

Visual thinker, business consultant & workshop facilitator. I use pictures and creative processes to clarify strategy, align teams and engage employees. A different approach to change.

10 个月

A few organisations I’ve been with actually use their Values for PDR assessments, “how have you displayed ‘integrity’ in the past 6 months…?” (pay raise dependent, so consider your answer carefully). Even with clarifying statements, the idea that an individual’s values align with abstract org concepts and can be measured on that doesn’t make sense. And an org’s Purpose has to be connectable for people and not just done for the sake of it. The best story I heard was (as depicted here) an org displayed their “Perpose” and wondered why people failed to interact with it…

  • 该图片无替代文字

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Fionnuala O'Conor的更多文章

  • How to Do Enterprise Tech Right

    How to Do Enterprise Tech Right

    If organisational change is a crapshoot, technology change sits between Russian Roulette and an uncontrolled nuclear…

  • How an English Literature Degree Equipped Me for Tech Entrepreneurship

    How an English Literature Degree Equipped Me for Tech Entrepreneurship

    It’s rare that someone looks far enough down my LinkedIn profile to notice what I studied at university, but when they…

    2 条评论
  • What's gone wrong with leadership?

    What's gone wrong with leadership?

    Who thinks leadership is great right now? Not employees – less than a quarter are fully engaged at work, number one…

    8 条评论
  • Has Leadership Development Failed?

    Has Leadership Development Failed?

    $60 billion – more than Elon Musk’s bonus – gets spent every year on leadership development. So how come leadership…

    17 条评论
  • LinkedIn - I'm a CEO, not your unpaid Mechanical Turk

    LinkedIn - I'm a CEO, not your unpaid Mechanical Turk

    Amongst the usual inbox junk last week - software sales pitches, tax credit accounting offers, real estate agent…

    20 条评论
  • Why professional services need more products

    Why professional services need more products

    High-end businesspeople tend to get all snooty when it comes to products. We provide services – they correct me, in the…

    11 条评论
  • Conversation in a crisis

    Conversation in a crisis

    In Atul Gawande’s magnificent Being Mortal, he talks about the difference between good and bad conversations at times…

    4 条评论
  • How do I get people to do what they're told?

    How do I get people to do what they're told?

    If there’s one thing that would make everyone’s life easier right now, it’s other people doing what they’re told. But…

  • We are all cyborgs, as of last week

    We are all cyborgs, as of last week

    Blogging on Robots and Me was always speculative – possible robots as well as possible me – but turbulence in my…

  • What work works...and can I get a robot to do it for me? (2/5)

    What work works...and can I get a robot to do it for me? (2/5)

    How much of what you do in the name of work actually matters? And just how scared should you be that a robot could do…

    4 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了