Corporate Law Daily
Dear Reader,
Today’s newsletter analytically summarizes the top Corporate Law stories reported at taxmann.com.
Segregates the regulatory and the operational part in OI rules and regulations respectively.
Investments by Indian entities outside India are a very common phenomenon and several companies have a presence outside India by virtue of forming a Joint Venture (‘JV‘) and Wholly Owned Subsidiaries (‘WOS‘). With the enforcement of the amendment proposed in the Finance Act, 2015 in October 2019 powers vested with the Central Government (CG) and Reserve Bank of India (RBI) with respect to permissible Capital Account Transaction were revisited. Power to frame rules relating to Non-Debt instruments (‘NDI‘) were vested with CG and to frame regulations relating to debt instruments were vested with RBI. The scope of NDI inter alia covers all investment in equity instruments in incorporated entities: public, private, listed and unlisted; acquisition, sale or dealing directly in immoveable property.
RBI, with effect from August 22, 2022 has combined erstwhile FEMA (Transfer or Issue of Foreign Security) Regulations, 2004 (‘erstwhile ODI regulations‘) and FEMA (Acquisition and Transfer of immovable property outside India) Regulations, 2015 into FEMA (Overseas Investment) Rules, 2022 (‘OI Rules‘) and FEMA (Overseas Investment) Regulations, 2022 (‘OI Regulations‘) and the erstwhile regulations stand superseded. The draft rules and regulations were rolled out for public comments on August 9, 2021. Our article on the draft regulatory framework is available on our website. RBI has also issued the compiled FEMA (Overseas Investment) Directions, 2022 (‘OI Directions‘) covering the OI Rules and OI Regulations grouping the requirements under three categories viz. General provisions, Specific provisions and Other operational instructions to the AD Banks. It also provides for certain compliance requirements from the erstwhile ODI Master Directions, not covered in OI Rules or Regulations.
Overseas Investments are prohibited unless made in accordance with the FEMA Act, OI Rules and OI Regulations. The investments already made in accordance with the erstwhile ODI Regulations will be deemed to have been made under OI Rules and Regulations. This article provides an overview of the notified rules and regulations and the broad amendments as compared to the erstwhile norms.
OI Rules v/s OI Regulations
OI Rules provide the regulatory framework for making overseas investments covering the permissions, conditions for making overseas investments, restrictions from making Overseas Direct investments (‘ODI‘), pricing guidelines, transfer, liquidation and restructuring of ODI. While the OI Rules have been framed by CG, however, the same will be administered by the RBI as per Rule 3 (1).
OI Regulations, on the other hand, provide only the operational part covering conditions for undertaking Financial Commitment (‘FC‘), other than by investment in equity capital, consideration in case of acquisition or transfer of equity capital of a Foreign Entity (‘FE‘), mode of payment, obligations of Persons Resident in India (‘PRII‘), reporting requirements, consequence of delay in reporting and restrictions on further FC/ transfer.
Non-applicability of OI Rules and Regulations (Rule 4)
1.?Investments made by a financial institution in an IFSC. The draft OI Rules provided for exclusion of any investment made in IFSC, however the OI Rules prescribes the conditions for investment in IFSC vide Schedule V to OI Rules);
2.?Acquisition or transfer of any investment outside India made out of Resident Foreign Currency Account (draft rules provided for exception only in case of acquisition of an immoveable property outside India by an individual from a person resident outside India. However, Para A.5 of erstwhile ODI Master Directions exempted purchase/ acquisition of securities out of the funds held in the RFC account);
3.?Acquisition or transfer of any investment outside India made out of foreign currency resources held outside India by a person who is employed in India for a specific duration irrespective of length thereof or for a specific job or assignment, duration of which does not exceed three years; or
4.?Acquisition or transfer of any investment outside India made in accordance with Section?6(4) ?of FEMA Act i.e. where the investment in the foreign security or any immovable property situated outside India was acquired when the person was resident outside India or inherited from a person who was resident outside India.
Further, the erstwhile ODI Master Directions provided general permission for purchase/acquisition of securities by a person resident in India as bonus shares on existing holding of foreign currency shares and also for rights shares against holding of shares in accordance with provisions of law. The OI Rules cover the same under Rule 7.
Components of Overseas Investment (Rule 2)
Under the erstwhile ODI regulations, effective till August 21, 2022, there was a concept of direct investment outside India in JV and WOS that excluded portfolio investment and FC. OI Rules combine the two to define FC and separately define the term Overseas Portfolio Investment (‘OPI‘). Overseas Investment (‘OI‘) is FC + OPI. The classification as ODI depends on the nature of instruments in which investment is made, the nature of the entity in which investment is made and whether control has been acquired or not. The diagram below provides a snapshot of the same.
ODI in an unlisted foreign entity may or may not result in control. However, ODI in a listed foreign entity will result in control as holding of 10% or more of the paid-up equity capital of the listed foreign entity will entitle to 10% or more of voting rights in the said entity.
ODI v/s OPI
OPI means investment in foreign securities that is not ODI and excludes investment in any unlisted debt instruments or any security issued by a person resident in India who is not in an IFSC. The classification is relevant as Schedule I and II to the ODI Rules provides for the manner in which ODI and OPI can be made by an Indian Entity. The limits for OPI and ODI are different. In case of ODI by IE, the limit for FC in all FEs taken together is 400 % of the net worth as on the date of the last audited balance sheet, while in case of OPI the limit is 50% of the net worth as on the date of the last audited balance sheet. The limit of FC does not include capitalization of retained earnings but includes utilization of balances in the EEFC a/c., utilization of the amount raised by issue of ADR, GDR and stock swap and utilization of ECB proceeds. This was excluded under the erstwhile regime and in order to ensure smooth transition, as indicated in the OI Directions. FC through such resources after the date of notification will be reckoned towards FC limit. Limits for investment by resident individual is pegged to the limit under the Liberalized Remittance Scheme (‘LRS‘). Further, the limit for investment by mutual funds, venture funds etc are similar to erstwhile regime.
A listed IE is eligible to make OPI within the aforesaid limit, while an unlisted IE is eligible to make OPI only towards rights issue or bonus issue by FE, capitalization of any amount due, swap of securities and schemes of arrangement.
Restriction on layers of subsidiary (Rule 19)
RBI FAQs on erstwhile ODI Regulations prohibited an India Party to set up an Indian subsidiary(ies) through its foreign WOS or JV and also prohibited an IP to acquire a WOS or invest in JV that already had direct/indirect investment in India under the automatic route. In such cases, the IPs were required to approach the Reserve Bank for prior approval through their AD Banks which were considered on a case to case basis, depending on the merits of the case.
Under the present OI Rules, the prohibition is applicable only where it results in a structure with more than two layers of subsidiaries. The exemption is provided to the entities covered under Rule 2 (2) of Companies (Restriction on Number of Layers) Rules, 2017. The OI Rules seems to have diluted the stringent norms under the erstwhile provisions.
Investment in debt instruments by Indian Entity (IE) (Reg. 3)
The distinction between debt and non-debt instruments as provided in Rule 5 of the OI Rules is relevant as OI Regulations provide for conditions to be complied by an Indian entity while investing in any debt instrument. The components of non-debt instruments are the same as defined under FEMA (Non-Debt Instruments) Rules, 2019. Debt instrument means government bonds, corporate bonds, all tranches of securitisation structure which are not equity tranche, borrowings by firms through loans and depository receipts whose underlying securities are debt securities.
The underlying conditions for investing in debt instruments of an FE, as provided in Reg. 3 of OI Regulations, is that the entity should be eligible to make ODI and should have made ODI in the foreign entity and the entity should have acquired control in such foreign entity at the time of making such financial commitment.
Approval requirement (Rule 9, 10)
The OI Rules provide for investments that will require prior approval of CG, RBI and NOC from lender banks/ regulatory bodies etc. The Erstwhile ODI Regulations only mandated prior approval of RBI in case eligibility conditions stipulated were not met by the Indian party or resident individual.
The erstwhile ODI Master Directions prohibited an Indian Party from making direct investment in countries identified by Financial Action Task Force (‘FATF’) as ‘non co-operative countries and territories’ as per the list available on FATF website or as notified by RBI. The OI Rules do not expressly provide for such prohibition, however, empowers the CG to advise countries or jurisdictions where overseas investment shall not be made.
Further, as provided in the erstwhile ODI Master Directions for prior approval of RBI for any FC exceeding USD 1 billion or its equivalent in a financial year even when the total FC of the Indian Party was within the eligible limit under automatic route (i.e. within 400% of the net worth as per the last audited balance sheet), the requirement continues under the current regime as well.
Procedure for seeking approval of RBI has been provided in the OI Directions.
Approval requirement has been dispensed for deferred payment of consideration, investment/ disinvestment by PRII under investigation by any investigative agency/ regulatory body, issuance of corporate guarantee to or on behalf of second or subsequent step down subsidiary and write-off on account of disinvestment.
The concept of ‘deemed consent’ in case of NOCs upon expiry of sixty days from the date of application may be a cause of concern for the lenders/ banks/ regulatory agencies etc.
Reporting requirements (Reg. 10)
The OI Regulations provide for various reporting requirements for FC and OPI including in case of disinvestment and restructuring. Reporting is very crucial as the OI Rules provide for prohibition on further FC or transfer to continue until any delay in reporting is regularized with payment of Late Submission Fees (‘LSF’) for an amount and in the manner as provided in the OI Directions. LSF amount is levied per return and the maximum amount for LSF will be limited to 100% of amount involved in the delayed reporting. The erstwhile ODI regulations restricted only in case of non-filing of Form APR. The format of forms have been provided in the Master Directions on Reporting under FEMA Act. Incomplete filing will be considered as non-submission.
Note 1: In case of OPI by way of acquisition of shares or interest under Employee Stock Ownership Plan or Employee Benefits Scheme, the reporting is required to be done by the office in India or branch of an overseas entity or a subsidiary in India of an overseas entity or the Indian entity in which the overseas entity has direct or indirect equity holding, where the resident individual is an employee or director.
Further, as per the OI Directions, similar to the requirement under the erstwhile regime, evidence of investment that classify as ODI is required to be submitted within a period of six months to the AD Bank.
Acquisition and transfer of immovable property outside India (Rule 21)
Note 2:?In case of acquisition by Indian entity, the existing limits for remittance towards initial and recurring expenses remain intact, as provided below:
Other key amendments notified
Amendments proposed but not notified
Concluding remarks
The new regime for OI, substituted after 18 years of the erstwhile regime, is more clear and elaborate and covers conditions for investments overseas by IE, resident individual and entities other than the IE and the individuals. Certain compliance requirements have been liberalized, where approval requirements have been done away with as discussed in above paragraphs; at the same time consequence of delayed reporting has been made more stringent. Most of the amendments proposed in the draft rules and regulations have been notified except for very few. IEs are required to take note of the components of the existing investments and the reporting compliances ensured. Those funding the OI through EEFC a/c, ADR/ GDR proceeds, ECB proceeds will be required to take note of the deletion of the carve out effective from August 22, 2022. There exists some lack of clarity on restriction on layers of subsidiaries, which RBI may consider to clarify in its FAQs.
Earlier in August, the SEBI had revised the definition of the term ‘associate’. Now SEBI has clarified that AMCs shall ensure to make scheme-wise disclosure of investments (as on the last day of each quarter) in securities of such entities that are excluded from the definition of associate. Disclosure of Investment shall include ISIN-wise value of investment and value as a percentage of AUM of the scheme.
That’s it from us for today! Stay Tuned for more updates from?Taxmann.com
Join Taxmann's Live Webinar | Know About Succession Planning
?? 27th August 2022 (Saturday) | ?? 05:00 PM – 06:00 PM (IST)
?? Register Now for FREE (Limited Slots Available): https://taxmann.social/tw0G8
?? Coverage of the Webinar:
?? Basics and Types of Succession Planning
?? Myths vs Facts about Succession Planning
?? Approach for the Succession Planning in Business
?? Successor Identification and their Grooming
?? Basic Understanding of Succession Law
?? Basic of Family Council and Family Constitution
?? Drafting of Will and its Legality
?? Formation of Trust
?? Case Studies
? How can a planned succession transaction increase the market cap by 28% to 30%?
? How can a planned succession transaction increase your company's EBITA by 5%-10%?
?? Speaker:
? Ravi Mamodiya – Chartered Accountant
Ravi is a fellow member of the ICAI. He is a managing partner of A.R. Mamodiya & Co., Jaipur, and a business consulting firm, Master Insiders LLP. His 10+ years of experience gives him an in-depth understanding of different levels of organisations and an edge in developing process-designing. He writes and regularly speaks for various platforms of the ICAI and Trade Associations.?
?? Relevant For:
? Business Owners
? Family Entrepreneurs
? Practicing Tax Professionals
? Revenue Officers