Corporate Impacts on Ecosystem Services: A New Approach to Accountability

Corporate responsibility in the modern world encompasses more than just carbon footprints; it also involves understanding how actions affect the environment and its vital services, such as flood protection, fertile soil, and clean water. Companies may now evaluate their influence on these ecosystem services thanks to a new open-source method, which increases accountability and transparency for corporate environmental implications.

Why Ecosystem Services Matter

The natural processes that support human life, known as ecosystem services, are essential to the resilience and sustainability of businesses. These services, which are crucial to preserving healthy ecosystems that benefit both communities and companies. Ecosystem services form the backbone of human and economic wellbeing, providing resources and protections that benefit both people and businesses. These services include:

1. Water Purification: Clean water, necessary for industrial and public health requirements, is produced by natural filtration processes in rivers and wetlands.
2. Climate Regulation: Oceans and forests are essential for absorbing CO2 emissions and regulating world temperatures.
3. Pollination and Soil Fertility: Biodiversity ensures that ecosystems can sustain crop yields and offer resources, which in turn supports agriculture and food production.
4. Coastal Protection: By acting as natural barriers, mangroves, reefs, and wetlands lessen the effects of storms and stop expensive erosion along coastlines.

Companies that depend on natural resources or work in hazardous environments are more vulnerable to interruptions in these services. Therefore, preserving and improving ecosystem services is crucial for a company's long-term resilience and risk management, in addition to being good for the environment.

How the New Approach Works

This novel approach uses global mapping and high-resolution satellite imagery to assess corporate assets across industries and identify areas with the greatest ecological impacts. The method assists businesses in determining their environmental impact, from mining to utilities and real estate, enabling them to make better decisions that support sustainability objectives. The methodology includes:

• High-Resolution Mapping: Businesses can see their ecosystem footprint by using precise satellite imagery and data to identify the locations of company assets.
• Sector-Specific Analysis: Evaluations are customized for many industries, ranging from utilities and finance to mining and real estate, enabling businesses to see their effects within the particular framework of their operations.
• Comparative Insights: This method allows businesses to compare their performance to competitors and industry norms by analyzing ecosystem service KPIs across businesses and industries.

Key Findings Across Sectors

Initial assessments of the technique demonstrate the broad range of effects across industries, highlighting the necessity of sector-specific strategies:

1. Utilities and Real Estate: Because their assets are located in highly valuable, crowded coastal areas, businesses in these industries have a significant impact on coastal conservation. For instance, coastal wetlands that serve as natural flood barriers may be threatened by coastal real estate projects, underscoring the necessity of relocation or other protective measures.
2. Mining and Materials: Mining firms significantly affect species habitats and water quality, particularly when they operate in regions with rich biodiversity. The retention of soil and sediment is frequently disturbed by extractive activities, which impacts downstream water resources as well as local biodiversity.
3. Finance and Investment: When funding projects in sensitive areas, financial organizations that own assets in high-value natural areas have the potential to indirectly affect ecosystem services. Financial institutions can steer clear of high-impact areas or give priority to investments that promote biodiversity by being aware of these effects.

Implications: A New Standard for Sustainable Accountability

Businesses can use this tool to evaluate their ecosystem impacts and make well-informed decisions about reducing their environmental impact. firms can:

• Optimize Asset Locations: By examining high-impact locations, firms can move or modify operations to lower-impact places, especially for new developments.
• Reduce Environmental Risks: By comprehending ecosystem dependencies, companies can put risk-reduction strategies into place, such as habitat restoration, offset initiatives, or improved protective buffers around vulnerable locations.
• Fulfill ESG Objectives: Companies can give more thorough sustainability indicators and conform to international environmental requirements by integrating ecosystem service measures into environmental, social, and governance (ESG) reporting frameworks.

?A Step Toward Sustainable Accountability

It is not only a conscientious decision to include ecosystem services in corporate assessments, but it is also a wise investment in sustainability and resilience. Businesses should take more proactive measures toward sustainability by addressing ecosystem impacts at the asset level, making sure that their operations help rather than harm the ecosystems on which we all depend. This technology promises to enable businesses, investors to build a more sustainable future as it develops further. A major change in corporate responsibility, adopting ecosystem accountability emphasizes how important it is for companies to preserve and improve the natural resources that support both economic growth and global health.

Ref: Mandle, L., Shea, A., Soth, E. et al.

#TEEB for Business #Natural Capital Protocol #WRI