Corona update #2 When the top executive fails on purpose

Corona update #2 When the top executive fails on purpose

Several times the past week Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen has addressed the nation on the emerging COVID-19 crisis. At one of the live press briefings I noticed one particularly interesting point. The PM essentially said, “We cannot wait for evidence. We cannot wait until we are entirely sure what will work. We are going to make mistakes. I am going to make mistakes.”

This is very, very unusual coming from a top executive. An in particular from a political leader.

For too long, too many leaders have focused almost exclusively on control and avoiding error. Openness about uncertainty and failure has been toxic for any substantial management careers. That goes for business, and it goes for government.

But in the situation we find ourselves in right now, the honesty and transparency Ms Frederiksen demonstrates is almost acceptable – perhaps even a positive expression of powerful leadership.

It reminds me of a parallel historical example from the American 1932 election campaign, which took place during the Great Depression. The Democrat Franklin D. Roosevelt was a candidate and during the primaries he gave a keynote to a small university in the state of Georgia. He addressed the crisis and the missing answers in an uncertain time.

He said, and now I am quoting, that the challenge called for “Bold, persistent experimentation.” More down to Earth, he said that the best approach would be to try something, and if that fails, admit it and try something else. An unheard of approach, where a presidential candidate basically said he did not have a plan.

The critical reactions came hard and fast. The next day the New York Times wrote condescendingly that his policy was “just try something”. Roosevelt's own political advisor, who had not seen the speech and only heard about it through the media, called the proposal “An appalling piece of stupidity.”

But the American population loved it. Roosevelt not only won the campaign that year. He became America’s longest sitting president.

Under conditions of high uncertainty, full knowledge is an impossibility. Pretending otherwise is at best naive, at worst dangerous. In the design field we are used to building rough prototypes, learning from feedback, and adjusting our approach. For managers in government, as well as in business, this "design attitude" is essential if they are to move forward and make decisions in spite of the current turbulence. This calls for humility as well as the will to execute -- and a bit of courage. Leaders can learn from that.

I am in no doubt that in this time of extreme turbulence we must listen to those leaders who ask us to follow them even though they admit they do not fully know the path ahead. Especially because they admit they do not know it.

I love the FDR quote and use it regularly! Looking forward to our chat later today!

回复
Anne Caspari

Complexity Coaching, Leadership Training, Sensemaking

4 年

act- sense - respond :-)

Jacob Christoffer Pedersen

Partner & Forfatter | Underst?tter ledelse i uforudsigelighed med et relationelt fokus | Ledelsesekspertise

5 年

This is a very relevant point - and therefore also somewhat discomforting to see blame games starting to pop up already. And on that note, one could perhaps argue that what has been going on so far has been more about trying to stabilize a potentially chaotic situation through rapid and powerful actions - now looking for signs that it has actually stabilized. Chaotic situations rarely render themselves prone to experimentation - at least not systematically - as we do not have the time (I acknowledge this may be splitting hairs but for the sake of the reflection ...). A more stabilized situations does - albeit not a situation that allows for predictability. Therefore I think it will be even more interesting to see how they will approach opening up the country. This I believe will be a true test of an experimental mindset: will they aim for the grand masterplan or try things bit by bit, monitor the consequences and then scale when positive. If the latter, I would argue that the positive signs of accepting potenial missteps will be quenched and we will be back to normal within seconds, so to speak (not positive).

As long as admittance of possible wrongdoing beforehand, does not alleviate leaders of their responsibility to the actions they set in motion. This goes for any leader, in any context. After the nation has overcome this challenge, we must pragmatically and honestly evaluate our leaders, our political system, and the function of the state - did they perform as they should have?

Suzana Barbosa ??

Creative Startup Coach I Regenerative Practitioner & Designer | Unplug & Reconnect in the Enchanting Azores | Psych-K? Facilitator

5 年

Very well said! Being vulnerable, and honest will always provide refuge for people.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Christian Bason, Ph.D.的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了