The Core Files: Data, Magical Thinking & What You Really Need For Change
Marla Gottschalk, Ph.D.
LinkedIn Top Voice | I/O Psychology Practitioner | Author of The Core Files Newsletter | Helping organizations tell their story & grow ??
I've been on the data side of organizational change and development projects more times than I can count. Early in my career, I was often responsible for designing research and sifting through the results, sometimes based upon huge sample sizes. All of this was carried out, in an attempt to understand how customers really feel about a product or how people might become more successful in their roles. I spent hours upon hours, with volumes of data, wondering how to make sense of it all and advise my clients on what to do next.
In most cases, what was salient and needed to be expressed would finally emerge. I was always grateful for that moment, even though it might mean spending many a night, worrying how a leader might react to what the data exposed. (Thank goodness for my amazing mentors during that time.)
Yet as it turns out — all of that was really the easy part.
You see there was this catch. We can quickly become comfortable, armed solely with data — as we try to impose a sense of things and create meaningful change.
The hard part truly begins, when we are tasked with implementing solutions in response to those data points. In other words, to actually connect the dots and change things as a result. (This involves other elements, including communication strategies.) Personally, I'm often external to the organization, so even though I might share recommendations, it is impossible to be on site as every solution is fine-tuned and rolled out. And when all is said and done, I've seen surprising (even nonsensical) actions in response to data that could have been avoided. It's almost as if we want to skip the sticky stuff and avoid looking under the hood.
Data can act like the solution, when it is not (and it's good at that).
Here are a few of my talking points that I now add to every change discussion. I'm uncertain if you'll be surprised. However you just might realize, where you need to adjust.
领英推荐
Do you have a change story? Share with the community in comments.
Visit my website to inquire about working with me.
As a charter member of LinkedIn Top Voice program, I tackle topics related to the core of our work lives. As an organizational consultant & storyteller — I have a deep passion to share what is vital about work life with both honesty & emotion. Stay tuned for more topics that help founders & organizations thrive.
Disrupting Social Sector Performance Reporting
5 天前Understanding, documenting and sharing "The Story Behind the Data" is one of the best ways to engage other important stakeholders, especially in creating social impact. Transparency leads to trust and trust leads to more investment.
?????? Uncovering actionable insights to grow traffic and enable sales teams | ?? Digital Marketing Analyst | Power BI | GA4 | Excel | SQL | Data Viz | ?? Remote Work | ?? Traveler
5 天前As a data analyst, I can confirm that these results are spot on with what we see on the ground. The data is merely a starting point of discussion. The team's culture has to be one that embraces change if data is to be leveraged, and there's a lot of trust that's needed between the triangle of analyst, data, and stakeholder.
Lead Engineer @ FICO | Coding, AWS, Automation
6 天前"Lots of insight — about the people and the situations — touched by that change effort. As humans, we tend to feel that if we have the data it's enough. It is not enough." This sentence caught my attention. Unfortunately, there are many organizations that advance people into management that don't possess the requisite skills to understand people and situations, and how to leverage them to achieve their goals. Data and insights will only go so far if management is stale, and yes, inept. Now you're facing a very difficult situation. I know I've faced it many times in my career. Without alienating your customer base, perhaps you can comment on how to approach this type of situation.
Técnica Superior | Planeamento, Controlo e Avalia??o no Setor Público
1 周This article brought back one of the most defining moments of my career — when I understood the real difference between having data and gaining insight. As Technical Director of a training center for people with disabilities (physical, intellectual, and psychological), I led a rapid transformation at the start of COVID-19. Practically overnight, we shifted from in-person to remote training — a major challenge given our trainees’ needs. Our first step wasn’t technical. It was human. We called each trainee to ask how they were, what equipment they had, and what they needed. That’s when the key insight emerged: They didn’t fear the change — they feared losing connection. That changed everything. Despite internal resistance, especially from HR, their motivation gave us momentum. In four weeks: ? Staff took equipment home and adapted to remote work. ? Training hours were reduced and restructured. ? We provided internet/tablets to those in need. ? Some home visits were done safely to help with setup. ? We launched SOS phone lines for direct support. ? Daily emotional and social support was provided. It was hard — but meaningful. Data showed the way. Listening moved us forward. Belief held us together.
Group Managing Director @ Nayabo Solutions | Data Scientist
1 周I particularly appreciate how you highlight the misconception that data alone is enough. It’s a powerful tool, but without deep insight into the people affected by the change, we risk drawing incomplete conclusions or, worse, implementing misguided solutions. Your emphasis on ensuring belief—both in the change itself and in those driving it—is especially profound. Change isn’t just a process; it’s a journey that requires trust, alignment, and a compelling narrative. The point about “magical thinking” stood out to me as well. Too often, organizations assume that acknowledging a problem or presenting compelling data is equivalent to action. But as you rightly point out, the real work happens on a much deeper level. Your structured, thoughtful approach to change management is both practical and insightful. The recommendation to follow up on data points, craft a clear change story, and communicate with the intensity Kotter suggests is invaluable. This is the kind of wisdom that bridges the gap between analysis and real-world impact. Thank you for sharing these lessons—this is a must-read for anyone leading or advising on organizational change!