Navigating the slowdown by B Schools & Engg Colleges
Krishna Gopal
Coach, Advisor, Mentor; TEDx Speaker ; Blogger; Trainer; Sales Enablement; #AIM; #PadiHaiwithKG
I was recently invited to be a panelist by Business Standard and one of the questions that was asked was about the Slowdown and hence hiring pressures.
Indeed there is some slowdown much contrary to what happened during COVID when business actually boomed and surprised the IT & BPO industry. Cloud happened - online commerce grew - we adapted to Work From Home and productivity rose.
I think from 2023 onwards global tensions arose. Ukraine, India elections, China, Israel all contributed to dampening the sentiments. Discretionary spending is down and the focus has been on keeping the lights on.
At the same time, of late, things have started to look up ever so slightly if you go by the results that are getting announced. Hiring indications are back at the campuses. And yet it is not the same as before. Besides during the bull run, B schools and Engg colleges have proliferated in the country. The supply has gone up a great deal. And even a moderate dip in demand seems to have a catastrophic outcome.
In the meantime over the past 6 quarters, IT firms have used the opportunity to rationalize further. The advent of AI has helped a great deal too. Companies have taken a hard look at the middle management that got bloated during the boom. Right sizing, role redundancies and weeding out poor performers has resulted in increased availability of talent. Professionals are willing to work for much less - "Hey I just want a job"
The next milestone is the US elections. And till then investments will remain muted and the US market will not be a major driver of global business growth. Even after the elections, much will depend on the outcome and the nature of the government that will be formed.
Luckily the Manufacturing industry is looking up, so are Defense and Infrastructure in India. Hospitality & Tourism are also going big. There is huge push towards digitization by the Indian government. Pharma and Healthcare are also likely to be hiring.
So this is the good news.
The bad news is that students who have to come to expect the goodies provided by the IT industry will have to adapt
So what should Tier 2-3-4 colleges do to adapt.
领英推荐
Of course, be realistic and prepare the students. Bring in courses, assignments, internships and visiting professors from these industries.
Woo them, travel to these firms and invite their HR and Business Leaders on your panel discussions. Ask them if they will teach some courses. Ideate with them jointly on academia industry collaboration.
One area where colleges may wish to put undue efforts is in building ATTITUDE.
ATTITUDE trumps APTITUDE any day and yet not much systematic efforts have been made to build ATTITUDE.
Let me go on a limb here and recommend the FLY (Find the Leader in You) program run by CMI (www.competitivenessmindset.org ) a Not For Profit organization incorporated in Princeton, NJ, USA.
Using state of the art well researched methodology, CMI trains youth in 5 traits viz
This is something that Tier 2-3-4 colleges may wish to consider!!!!
#PadiHaiwithKG
Head Talent Development at Prodapt
3 个月Insightful article, Krishna Gopal Despite the slowdown in hiring due to fears surrounding AI and the challenging global macroeconomic conditions, the demand for top talent and niche skills remains strong. Freshers can stay relevant by keeping up with the latest tech skills. Since college curricula may not cover all industry-relevant skills, students should go the extra mile to learn independently, solve real-world problems, and maintain a sense of curiosity
Coach, Advisor, Mentor; TEDx Speaker ; Blogger; Trainer; Sales Enablement; #AIM; #PadiHaiwithKG
3 个月Somehow the article came out as incomplete and I just edited and completed it. ??
CEO @ NGenious Solutions, Inc. | Leading Microsoft Enterprise Solutions Provider with Microsoft SharePoint, Teams, AI, Power Platform, Dyamics 365 and ServiceNow.
3 个月Dear Krishna Gopal . Good insightful article and i agree with most of the analysis. However, I would like to understand if the resources that were weeded out as "poor performers", should they be called as available "talent"? Did you mean to say these "poor performers" had lack in talent or that they were not billable enough due to lack of work?