COP25 failed to deliver on ambitious climate decisions

COP25 failed to deliver on ambitious climate decisions

African Civil Society has denounced the lack of firm commitments to deep emission cuts from industrialized countries that reflect the scale and urgency of the unfolding climate crisis.

National delegates to the UN climate change conference (COP25) in Madrid failed once more to step up to the existential challenge of the climate crisis, after two weeks of negotiations.

COP25 President, Carolina Schmidt, lamented “the agreements reached by parties are insufficient to tackle the crisis of climate change with urgency. There is still no consensus to raise ambition to the levels needed”.

Acknowledging countries indebtedness to the planet, she noted “the world is watching us and is waiting for concrete solutions from us. For this reason, today we are not satisfied”.

Governments agreed unanimously on the state of urgency and the need to increase ambition to respond to climate change in the next half of the century, inviting countries to update their Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) and to commit to carbon neutrality by 2050.

But the Conference did not achieve an agreement regarding Article 6 and the carbon market, one of the fundamental aspects to operationalize the Paris Agreement.

The African Group of Negotiators had pushed for ambitious decisions that reflect the special circumstances and needs of Africa commensurate with the unfolding climate emergency.

As floods, drought, advancing desertification and storms take their devastating toll on communities, important resources that should be going towards meeting social and economic needs are diverted to emergency response.

“For Africa, true to the language of the Paris Agreement, there have always been three related and equally important aspects to ambition: Ambition with regard to improving our NDCs, Ambition with regard to an adaptation goal and associated action; and Ambition on means of implementation,” said Barbara Creecy, President of the African Ministerial Conference on the Environment (AMCEN).

Adaptation finance remains crucial for Africa’s people in the face of deteriorating living conditions as a result of extreme weather phenomena associated with climate change.

“Without adequate means of finance developing countries face almost insurmountable barriers to participating in the war on climate change. It is important that the search for solutions to this continues,” said AMCEN President.

African Civil Society is disappointed with the lack of clear commitment to previously pledged climate finance and new scaled-up finance, particularly to fund gender-responsive adaptation and loss and damage.

“It is quite distressing that at COP25 there is still disagreement on a universal definition for climate finance, which risks further delaying badly needed financial support to developing countries and ensuring accurate climate finance reporting,” said the Pan-African Climate Justice Alliance (PACJA) in a statement.

Financial flows from developed countries to pay for adaptation, loss and damage as well as the Gender Action Plan remain main priorities for African countries.

Developed country parties must, therefore, provide enhanced, predictable, adequate and grant-based climate finance to developing country parties, while continuing to fulfil their pre-2020 climate finance commitment of US$100 billion per year during the period.

Hundreds of climate activists engaged in a peaceful but loud protest close to the plenary halls of COP25 as ministers dragged their feet on negotiations inside.

But governments cannot ignore the groundswell of public opinion demanding an urgent response to the climate crisis in entering a ‘decade of ambition’ that must see transformative policies to keep global temperature rise below 1.5 degrees Celsius.

By Kofi Adu Domfeh

Chikezie Festus

Travel Consultant at sweden embassy nigeria

4 年

????????????????????Gracoius Way Travels,Are you Planning to travel Abroad And Tired, Scared, of Negative, Results.USA????,CANADA????,SCHENGEN, AND MANY MORE, let us handle your vissa and travelling packages ,Call Hot line:09036778798or Wtp,09027031930

回复
Green Expo

Africa Green Waste and Energy Expo/Conference

4 年

Too bad

回复
Ambassador Gilbert Aboagye Boye

[hunDred][AYSDGs_AchieversAwardsWinnerLusakaZambia2023][Goal12][NasserYouthFellowship2023][FIGHR][UNV5207075][Teacher(Management In Living and General Knowledge In Art][ VolunteerBevol][|AYSDGsDelegateLZambiaLusaka2023]

4 年

How

回复
Odimegwu Onwumere

Writer/Award-winning Journalist/ Founder, Advocacy Network on Religious And Cultural Coexistence (ANORACC), NGO.

4 年
回复
Georges Remboulis

Strategic Advisor - Adapt & Mitigate.

4 年

This is a multi-jurisdiction effort that will take more time, step by step and must be measured and federated globally. Carbon taxes were started in the 80’s under a different name, Marginal Abatement Costs, it didn’t work as the cost benefit of different production methods or corporate diversification had little incentive. Carbon trading, is a policy that allows for the selling of the right to pollute. That in itself is counterproductive and doesn’t provide the right mindset. Getting that many countries to agree to be regulated is like herding cats, especially if a few major countries opt out. Other than the #planet benefits which are certainly obvious, an effective reward system is blatantly missing. A globally accepted platform that federates and regulates is missing, that must include rewards based on results and massive funding and corporate/government cultural change.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Kofi Adu Domfeh的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了