A Conversation with a Jewish Patriot

A Conversation with a Jewish Patriot

In my travels, I encountered a highly patriotic Jewish individual. We had an interesting conversation that was worth sharing. He asked me what I thought about the concept of a Militia. While my answer was spot on and more to the point than below, I am articulating the sentiment I expressed for those reading this post.

Purpose of a Militia

The constitutional purpose of a militia, as outlined in the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, was to provide for the security of a free state. The framers believed that a well-regulated militia was essential for defending against external threats and potential tyranny from a standing army.

Militias were seen as a means for citizens to participate in their defense and maintain a balance of power between the government and the people. The idea was rooted in the colonial experience, where local militias were crucial in resisting British rule. Thus, the militia was intended to serve both a practical military function and safeguard individual liberties.

Does the Media tell the whole truth on anything?

In ethical journalism, the media is expected to strive for accuracy and transparency, but the "whole truth" can be complex. Journalists should aim to present facts fairly and comprehensively, considering multiple perspectives. However, practical constraints like space, time, and the need for clarity can limit how much information is shared.

Ethical journalism also involves accountability and correction of errors. While complete disclosure might not always be possible, a commitment to truthfulness and integrity is fundamental. The goal is to provide the public with the information necessary to make informed decisions.

Republicans have been bamboozled using their own beliefs against them.

If you, as a citizen, had to take up arms against a tyrannical government that murdered your people, bombed their homes, etc, all in the name of national security, would that be a reason to fight back as a militia?

Using any patriotic definition, would Hamas not be the ideal militia for the injustices we are seeing in Israel?

If you were in a nation that pretended to care about all faiths equally that is comprised of Christians, Muslims, and Jews, should you automatically accept the word of the media on the conflict?

Israel has killed at least 640 Palestinians in north Gaza since it laid siege to the area 17 days ago, 33 of them since dawn on Monday, medical sources have told Al Jazeera.

“Genocide is unfolding in northern Gaza in its clearest form, in full view of the world. The occupation army is forcing residents of northern Gaza to either flee under bombardment or face killing in what resembles a circle of certain death,” it said, adding that the failure of the international community to stop this “war of extermination has emboldened Israel to continue its deadly campaign.

Meanwhile, Palestinian women forced to flee north Gaza said the Israeli army is separating and arresting dozens of men at checkpoints.

People filling water containers were targeted and killed. In Beit Lahiya, a school shelter was also attacked, with several killed and dozens wounded.

Do you dare ask why other countries in the United Nations are not supporting Israel and Genocide?

Do you dare ask yourself what biases or racist or religious beliefs you hold and are indoctrinated into that color your perception of world events?

According to the treaties in the 50's, Israel was to turn over Gaza to the Palestinian people but never kept up the agreement. What should we all think?



Michael Moorehead

Enterprise Architect / Principal Enterprise Infrastructure Architect (pre-sales)

4 周

FACTS: At the end of the 1948 Arab-Israeli War, Egypt was given control of the Gaza Strip. It was Egypt which placed Gaza under a military governor and chose not to allow Gaza to become a separate entity for two decades. [Even then, armed Palestinian "fedayeen" mounted attacks into Israel, drawing Israeli reprisals.] Egypt, Syria and Jordan started the Six-Day War against Israel in June 1967. Israel succeeded in pushing away the invasion and took Gaza Strip from Egypt, as a buffer against further aggression. The 1993 Oslo accords gave the Palestinians limited control in Gaza, and Jericho in the West Bank. When the radically Islamist group Hamas won the August 2005 Gaza elections, Israel evacuated all its troops and settlers from Gaza, leaving ongoing governance to the Hamas-led Palestinian Authority in Gaza. During this entire history, Gaza has been used as an attack base against Israel and this latest war was initiated by Hamas conducting a barbaric massacre and mass kidnapping of people who were peacefully celebrating. The same 'Hamas' who started this war could stop the war any day of the week by simply laying down their arms and returning any remaining hostages to Israel. -- So, as you said; "What should we all think?"

回复
Saba Faruqui

Disclaimer: Opinions and comments are my own and do not represent past, present or future employers… Free Palestine ??

4 周

According to the treaties in the 50's, Israel was to turn over Gaza to the Palestinian people but never kept up the agreement. What should we all think ??

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了