A Conversation with AI

I had a conversation with OpenAI 's ChatGPT about #AIart, which is a hot topic and pretty controversial right now. On one side, there is a group of people who think that this method of creation takes away from traditional artists and traditional art. There are also the concerns of plagiarism, and whether AI art is, in fact #Art. On the other side, there is a group of digital artists and brand new creatives who view this as a useful tool to add to their creative toolbox, (Like Photoshop, or Blender, or even Word).

I hope you enjoy my conversation, and I would love to hear your thoughts about this!

Q. ChatGPT responses are based on? logic, recorded fact,? and the accepted global societal standards, practices, and opinions. Is this a correct statement?

A. GPT (short for "Generative Pre-training Transformer") is a type of artificial intelligence (AI) model that is trained to generate human-like text based on a given input. ChatGPT is a variant of the GPT model that has been specifically designed to generate text for chatbot applications.

In general, the responses generated by ChatGPT and other AI models are based on the data that was used to train the model and the algorithms that are used to process that data. This means that ChatGPT responses may be based on logic, recorded fact, and the accepted global societal standards, practices, and opinions to the extent that these things are represented in the data that was used to train the model.

Q. Was the data used to train the model representative of the above things?

A. The data used to train ChatGPT and other artificial intelligence (AI) models can have a significant impact on the responses that the model generates. The quality and diversity of the data that is used to train the model can affect the model's ability to generate accurate and appropriate responses, and it can also influence the model's ability to generate responses that are representative of a wide range of perspectives, beliefs, and experiences.

It is not possible for me to say with certainty what specific data was used to train ChatGPT or how representative that data was of global societal standards, practices, and opinions. However, it is likely that the data used to train ChatGPT was based on a wide range of sources, including text from the internet, books, and other published materials.

Therefore, please exercise your own logical common sense when interpreting these responses.?

Q. If an artist feeds their own art into a generative AI art model, is the resulting artwork of the artist?

A. If an artist feeds their own artwork into a generative artificial intelligence (AI) model and the model generates a new piece of artwork based on the input, the resulting artwork could be considered a collaboration between the artist and the AI model. The artist would have contributed the original artwork as input and the AI model would have used that input to generate a new piece of art.

It's important to note that the AI model would not be creating the artwork entirely on its own, as it is using the artist's original artwork as input. However, the AI model may have added its own elements and transformed the original artwork in some way, resulting in a piece of art that is different from the original.

Ultimately, whether the resulting artwork is considered the work of the artist or a collaboration between the artist and the AI model would depend on the specific circumstances and the intentions of the artist. It would be up to the artist to decide how to credit and present the resulting artwork.

Q. Artists look at generative AI art models as a tool, like a paintbrush, or a set of paints. Artists do not credit the paintbrush with the creation of the art. Should artists look at AI as a partner instead?

A. It's up to the artist to decide how they want to credit and present the artwork that is generated using a generative artificial intelligence (AI) model. Some artists may view the AI model as a tool, similar to a paintbrush or other traditional artistic medium, and may not feel the need to credit the AI model in the same way that they would credit a specific brand of paint or a particular type of brush.

Other artists may view the AI model as a collaborator and choose to credit it as such. This could be especially relevant if the AI model has made significant contributions to the final artwork, such as by adding elements or transforming the original input in significant ways.

Ultimately, the decision of how to credit and present the artwork will depend on the specific circumstances and the intentions of the artist. It may be helpful for the artist to consider the role that the AI model played in the creation of the artwork and to consider how they want to communicate this to their audience.

Q. Opponents of AI art argue that art produced in this way is plagiarism, but via the input the artist provides, with the combination of the AI altering from the source of its inspiration, isn't plagiarism negated?

A. Plagiarism is the act of using the work of others without proper attribution or permission, and it can be a concern in the context of artwork generated using artificial intelligence (AI). However, it is possible for an artist to use a generative AI model in a way that does not constitute plagiarism.

If an artist uses their own original artwork as input for a generative AI model, and the model generates a new piece of artwork based on that input, the resulting artwork may not be considered plagiarism as long as the artist credits the AI model and presents the resulting artwork as a collaboration between the artist and the AI model. In this case, the artist has provided the original input and the AI model has used that input to create a new piece of art, so there is no issue of using someone else's work without proper attribution or permission.

It's important to note that the use of a generative AI model does not automatically negate the issue of plagiarism. If the artist uses someone else's artwork as input for the AI model, or if the artist presents the resulting artwork as their own without proper credit to the AI model or the original source of the input, plagiarism may still be an issue. It is important for artists to be mindful of these issues and to ensure that they are properly attributing and crediting the sources of their inspiration and input.

Q. So, if the artist uses a prompt along with the image of their own artwork, but the prompt mentions other artists, could the resulting artwork be considered plagiarized? Or would it be merely more of a source of inspiration?

A. If an artist uses a prompt that mentions other artists in combination with an image of their own artwork as input for a generative artificial intelligence (AI) model, and the model generates a new piece of artwork based on that input, it is possible that the resulting artwork could be considered to be influenced by the other artists mentioned in the prompt. However, whether or not the resulting artwork would be considered plagiarized would depend on the specific circumstances and the extent to which the other artists' work is used and credited.

If the artist uses the prompt and the image of their own artwork as inspiration for the AI model to generate a new piece of art, and the resulting artwork is significantly different from the original artwork and the other artists' work mentioned in the prompt, it is less likely that the resulting artwork would be considered plagiarism. However, if the resulting artwork is substantially similar to the other artists' work, or if the artist presents the resulting artwork as their own without proper credit to the other artists or the AI model, plagiarism may be an issue.

It is important for artists to be mindful of these issues and to ensure that they are properly attributing and crediting the sources of their inspiration and input. This can help to avoid any potential issues of plagiarism and ensure that the artist is fairly representing the sources of their work.

?

Q. Is getting a specific resulting image from a prompt with AI easy,? Can anyone do it, or is there some level of skill required to bring a specific, cohesive image from imagination to production using AI and prompting

A. Using a generative artificial intelligence (AI) model to generate an image based on a prompt can be relatively easy, depending on the specific AI model and the tools that are being used. Many AI models and software tools are designed to be user-friendly and can be used by people with little or no programming experience.

However, it is important to note that the process of using a generative AI model to create an image can be more complex than simply inputting a prompt and receiving a specific, cohesive image in return. Depending on the specific AI model and the input that is provided, the resulting image may not be exactly as the user intended, and it may require some level of skill and expertise to adjust the input or the AI model's parameters to achieve a specific result.

In general, the ease of using a generative AI model to create an image will depend on the specific model and tools being used, as well as the user's familiarity with these tools and their own artistic skills and abilities. It may be helpful for users to familiarize themselves with the specific AI model and tools that they are using and to practice using them to get a sense of their capabilities and limitations.

Q. It sounds like the context in which an artist uses an AI model to create artwork really matters when it comes to the originality of the artwork produced

A. The context in which an artist uses an artificial intelligence (AI) model to create artwork can be an important factor in determining the originality of the resulting artwork. If the artist is using their own original artwork as input for the AI model and the resulting artwork is significantly different from the original, it is more likely that the resulting artwork will be considered original.

However, if the artist is using someone else's artwork as input for the AI model or is simply providing a prompt for the AI model to generate an image, the resulting artwork may be less original. In these cases, the resulting artwork may be more heavily influenced by the original artwork or the prompt, and it may be more difficult to distinguish it as a unique, original piece.

It's important to note that the use of an AI model does not automatically negate the originality of the resulting artwork. The originality of the artwork will depend on the specific circumstances and the extent to which the artist has contributed original ideas and elements to the final piece. It is up to the artist to consider these issues and to make decisions about how to present and credit the resulting artwork in a way that fairly represents their own contributions and the influence of any other sources.

Q. What is the definition of an "Artist"

A. The definition of an "artist" can vary depending on the context in which the term is used. In general, an artist is someone who creates or produces art, which can include a wide range of activities such as painting, drawing, sculpture, music, literature, dance, theater, film, and other forms of creative expression.

Artists may work in a variety of settings, including studios, galleries, performance venues, and other locations. They may create art for personal expression, to communicate ideas or emotions, or to engage with an audience. Some artists may create art as a full-time occupation, while others may create art as a hobby or as a part-time pursuit.

The term "artist" can be used to refer to professional artists, who create and sell art as a means of earning a living, as well as to amateur or hobbyist artists, who create art for personal enjoyment or as a form of self-expression. The common thread among all artists is the act of creating or producing art, regardless of the specific medium or context in which they work.

Q. Does this apply to digital artists, and those who use AI tools also?

A. Yes, digital artists who use artificial intelligence (AI) tools to create art can be considered artists in the same way as artists who work with traditional mediums such as paint, pencil, or clay. Digital art is a form of artistic expression that uses digital technology to create and display art, and it can include a wide range of mediums such as digital painting, drawing, animation, and more.

Artists who use AI tools to create digital art may be considered digital artists, and they may use a variety of techniques and approaches to create their artwork. These artists may use AI models to generate images or animations, or they may use AI tools to manipulate and transform existing artwork or images.

Regardless of the specific medium or tools that an artist uses to create art, the act of creating and producing art is what defines an artist. Digital artists who use AI tools to create art are no different in this regard, and their work can be considered just as valid and meaningful as art created with traditional mediums.

Q. What about the concern that this digital and AI art trend will put traditional artists out of business?

A. There has been some concern that the use of artificial intelligence (AI) and digital tools in the creation of art could potentially impact the livelihoods of traditional artists who work with more traditional mediums such as paint, pencil, or clay.

It is possible that the increasing use of AI and digital tools in the art world could lead to changes in the way that art is created, exhibited, and sold, and it could potentially affect the demand for certain types of art or the career prospects of some traditional artists. However, it is important to note that the use of AI and digital tools in the art world is not a new development, and it has been an area of growth and experimentation for many years.

Ultimately, the impact of AI and digital tools on the art world and on the careers of traditional artists will depend on a variety of factors, including the specific mediums and tools that are used, the preferences and tastes of audiences and collectors, and the strategies and approaches of artists and galleries. It is likely that the use of AI and digital tools will continue to evolve and change over time, and it is important for artists and the art world to adapt and respond to these changes in a way that reflects the values and goals of the community.

Q. Is the emergence of AI in art similar to when photoshop and photo manipulation came into being? Doesnt it change the dynamic of art in the same way?

A. The emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) in the art world is similar in some ways to the emergence of digital tools such as Photoshop and other photo manipulation software. Both AI and digital tools have the potential to change the way that art is created and exhibited, and they can offer artists new opportunities and challenges.

Like Photoshop and other digital tools, AI can be used to create and manipulate images in a variety of ways, and it can be used to generate art that might not be possible to create using traditional mediums. AI can also be used to transform or enhance existing artwork, and it can be used to create interactive or immersive experiences for audiences.

However, the use of AI in art is also different in some ways from the use of digital tools such as Photoshop. AI can be used to create art that is more complex or abstract than what is possible with traditional digital tools, and it can offer artists new ways to explore and express ideas.

Overall, the emergence of AI in the art world is likely to change the dynamic of art in some ways, and it will be up to artists, galleries, collectors, and other members of the art community to adapt and respond to these changes in a way that reflects the values and goals of the community.

Q. It seems like digital is the transition of the present when it comes to alot of things, not just art. Is it safe to assume that AI? is the natural flow and the logical next step for creative tools, and so much more?

A. It is safe to say that artificial intelligence (AI) is an important and growing area of technology that is having an impact on a wide range of fields, including the arts. AI has the potential to transform the way that art is created, exhibited, and experienced, and it is likely to continue to play an increasingly significant role in the art world and in other creative industries.

AI can be used in a variety of ways to create and manipulate art, and it can offer artists new opportunities and challenges. For example, AI can be used to generate images or animations, or it can be used to transform or enhance existing artwork. AI can also be used to create interactive or immersive experiences for audiences, and it can be used to create art that is more complex or abstract than what is possible with traditional tools.

It is likely that the use of AI in the arts and other creative fields will continue to evolve and change over time, and it is important for artists and other creative professionals to be aware of these developments and to consider how they might be able to incorporate AI into their work. However, it is also important to recognize that AI is just one tool among many, and that it is up to individual artists and creative professionals to decide how they want to use it and how they want to express themselves through their work.