The Controlplex

The Controlplex

So, I thought it might be helpful to describe a system, or structure, in quick summary, that seems to be the current civilizational environment. According to my own, humble, observations.

I call the system “The Controlplex.” Not a “cratia” (rule) like democracy or autocracy, but a system that can contain and set the course of rulers of distinct types, their interrelationships, and their interactions with societies.

The Controlplex is not a grand conspiracy, but it does not need to be. It is a system that grew out of its own momentum, a self-reinforcing structure of monopolies, intelligence agencies, financial institutions, media networks, and political operatives that consolidate power simply because that is what power does. It does not require a central command. It does not require ideology. It only requires that each party acts in its own self-interest, and in doing so, strengthens the whole. Not by design, but by inertia. There is no singular ruler, no master architect. Power is held in systems, networks, and mechanisms that outlast administrations, outlast corporations, outlast individuals. Leaders change, companies collapse, governments fall, but the system adapts, shifts, and reconfigures itself to maintain control, because control is the only thing it knows how to do.

It does not rule through direct oppression unless necessary. It does not have to. It rules by structuring society in a way where compliance is the easiest, safest, and most convenient path. Surveillance is total, but no one calls it that. It is framed as security, efficiency, personalization. Every device logs movement, every transaction maps behavior, every online interaction feeds into predictive models designed not just to track but to shape. People are not forced into submission. They are nudged, funneled, and conditioned until deviation feels impossible, until autonomy is too costly to pursue. The economy functions the same way. It does not need explicit restrictions to keep people trapped. It simply structures access to survival in a way that makes escape impractical. Debt replaces chains. Wages stagnate. Housing becomes unattainable. Land is monopolized. Self-sufficiency is an illusion. It is not that people are not allowed to live outside the system, it is that the system makes it impossible.

Dissent is managed, not crushed. The Controlplex does not fear opposition; it absorbs it. Protest movements are not suppressed; they are redirected, monetized, commodified, and transformed into controlled opposition. Every rebellion that gains traction is either repackaged into something marketable or led into ideological dead ends that serve no threat to structural power. The internet was supposed to be a tool for democratization, but instead, it became a containment mechanism. It does not prevent free thought. It overwhelms it with noise. It does not silence dissent. It drowns it in a sea of irrelevant outrage and artificial division. It does not need to ban ideas outright. It just ensures that people are always fighting over the wrong ones.

An antique but useful feature has been brought into play to create an effigy of the Controlplex: automata. AI was marketed as an instrument of perfect prediction, peak efficiency, and limitless innovation, a technology that would unlock new wonders while also enhancing control. But it was never meant to be what was claimed. Its backers and evangelists always knew the hype was false. AI was never about intelligence. It was about justification—a way to restructure labor, restructure social order, erase legal protections, and expand surveillance while pretending it was progress. It was a control mechanism disguised as a breakthrough, a tool to offload responsibility while shifting wealth and power further upward. But AI has not become a panacea. It does not predict crime; it manufactures criminals. It does not stabilize markets; it drives speculation and collapse. It does not remove bias; it automates it at scale. It is a useful vaguery for several facets of the Controlplex.

The oligarchs, the tech billionaires, the political dynasties, and the intelligence bureaucracies do not form a single ruling class. They are cross-dependent yet adversarial, fighting for dominance within the same structure they all rely on. They sabotage each other, but never to the point of threatening the system itself, because no matter how much they hate each other, they all understand that the real threat is anything outside their sphere of control. They do not compete to destroy the system. They compete to rule different pieces of it. The strongmen like Trump are not exceptions to the Controlplex. They are predators within it. Trump did not try to overthrow the system. He tested it. January 6th was not a coup. It was a pressure test, his SA moment, his disposable political militia thrown against the gates to see what would give way. Musk is not a technological genius. He is a salesman, a master of securing deposits on products that do not exist, a state-backed monopolist leveraging public money to privatize industries under his control. The billionaires are not innovators. They are gatekeepers. They do not create. They acquire. They do not invent. They monopolize. Their job is not to advance technology. Their job is to identify potential threats to their dominance and buy them out before they become competition.

The Controlplex does not seek stability. It does not prevent collapse. It survives collapse. It thrives on brinksmanship. It is not designed for endurance. It is designed to persist for as long as possible while consuming itself in the process. Economic crises are not failures of governance. They are transfers of wealth. Every market crash is an opportunity for consolidation. Every collapse is a restructuring event that allows the ruling class to absorb more while the lower classes are liquidated. The system does not just tolerate disaster. It plans for it. It assumes that it will happen and ensures that when it does, power will not shift, only condense.

Destabilization is not an accident, it is a strategy. The Controlplex does not seek lasting value, only short-term leverage. Markets, industries, and entire nations are thrown into chaos, not because the system is failing, but because the manufacture of crisis is a tool of consolidation. The destruction of wealth, trust, and stability ensures that the game is always reset on their terms. It is not about building, it is about being the last man standing. Economic devastation, cultural fragmentation, and social decay are not side effects, they are tactics. Entire industries are gutted, cities hollowed out, populations thrown into insecurity because the only victory that matters is survival at the top. It is why they will willingly burn down functioning systems rather than allow alternatives to emerge.

This is not about control in the traditional sense. It is control through exhaustion. The system does not need to offer people hope, it only needs them to believe that there is nothing else. They do not need to build a better world. They only need to ensure that nothing better replaces them. The strategy is not progress, not longevity, it is attrition.

“They make it a desert and call it peace.”

It is not a machine that works flawlessly. It is a machine that works just well enough to keep going. It does not improve over time. It does not evolve into something greater. It expands while failing. Failing is not a problem. Failing is a feature. The Controlplex does not need to succeed at anything. It only needs to ensure that no alternatives emerge. It does not have to last forever. It only needs to outlast everything else. It does not seek progress, only continuation. It is not infallible, not invincible, not omnipotent. It is simply what remains when everything else has been eliminated.

It is failing. It is always failing. But failure is not its flaw. It is its function.

?

Liza Besso ?? Branding and Marketing Consultant

??Artist ?? Designer ?? Marketer I help people and businesses increase awareness and bottom lines.??

2 周

The system is broken. This breakdown of "The Controlplex" really hits on something I’ve been thinking about—how the endless debate between capitalism and communism distracts from the reality that both can lead to the same result: control at the top, scraps for everyone else. It’s not about ideology, it’s about who holds the reins. The billionaires, the tech oligarchs, the media gatekeepers—they don’t just control wealth, they control the narrative. Social media isn’t just a tool, it’s the stage for their reality TV show, where outrage is currency, and we’re the unpaid cast. Elon Musk is the most successful welfare recipient in history. Government subsidies, tax breaks, contracts—he’s leveraged public funds better than anyone, all while preaching self-made hustle culture. The same system that tells the rest of us to "bootstrap" hands over billions to the 1% without a second thought. I saw a post about a dragon—a perfect metaphor for the 1% sitting on a mountain of gold, hissing at the small folk. It got me thinking: you don’t take the dragon down head-on; that just drains your energy. I’m inspired to illustrate what I think is the real way to take it down.

回复
Sandy Martin

Owner, the Sandy Martin Gallery

3 周

Why does this have a familiar ring to it?

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Paul Mellender的更多文章

  • Let's discuss some stuff

    Let's discuss some stuff

    Hello! How are you? Well, you look fantastic! With the deluge of bullshit and the attempts to influence you, I thought…

    8 条评论
  • A biased interaction with Chat GPT

    A biased interaction with Chat GPT

    For your enjoyment- an interaction with Chat GPT 4o: Me (in summary): Write the reasons for the hype, dark marketing…

    8 条评论
  • Updates and Stuff

    Updates and Stuff

    Well hello! How are you? You are looking determined and stalwart, as always. So, I just wanted to give over a few…

    6 条评论
  • Art Advice 2023 Part 3

    Art Advice 2023 Part 3

    Okay, last one for the year. I’m sure this will be life-changing and stuff and things.

    8 条评论
  • Art advice 2023 Part 2

    Art advice 2023 Part 2

    Let me start off by asking what, I guess, you are asking: Why would I take advice from you? No idea. I have a keyboard…

    3 条评论
  • Art Advice 2023 Part 1

    Art Advice 2023 Part 1

    I know these art advice posts have become a family favorite every holiday season, so I certainly didn’t want to…

    10 条评论
  • More advice for artists before the New Year!

    More advice for artists before the New Year!

    1. Don’t obey in advance and don’t surrender in advance.

    1 条评论
  • Art advice..2021…it’s been a while

    Art advice..2021…it’s been a while

    1. Don’t surrender in advance nor be obedient in advance, this includes with your art work.

    4 条评论
  • Some 2021 Art advice! …that overlaps into some other matters.

    Some 2021 Art advice! …that overlaps into some other matters.

    1. Be careful when studying as an artist not to expend too much effort in studying art.

    13 条评论
  • Notes on facial expressions

    Notes on facial expressions

    Facial expressions have several uses and do several things. Often signaling, but not always.

    3 条评论

社区洞察