Contractual Realpolitik
Quality, Consequences and the Construction Industrial Complex (part 256).
1 Slide, 1 Ramble
My ramble on specifications and words.
Contractually it can be summed up as follows:
- Should = Won't
- May = No way
Specifications must be precise with zero ambiguity. Do not use the words Should or May.
Twitter: @BLDWhisperer
BlueRithm Brand Ambassador - www.BlueRithm.com
Related Posts & Links
#254 - Specifying Cx and Cx Roles https://bldwhisperer.com/specifying-cx-and-cx-roles/
#253 - Building Commissioning Bingo! https://bldwhisperer.com/building-commissioning-bingo/
#158 - "Should" https://bldwhisperer.com/should/
Edifice Complex Podcast
Podcast on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDGEo1pCt2k8NzvBNJ_78lA
Podcast on Spotify https://open.spotify.com/show/4hyglvmZaiReNGFA4ZvcUZ?si=aOxYtnDWTxOrxtuxhFygPA
Podcast Website https://edificecomplexpodcast.com
Training, facilitation and authorship about Building Services and Commissioning
4 年A thought-provoking post as always Adam Muggleton Are not "Must" and "Must not" more appropriate terms for specifications? Out of interest - here are some Building Services specification extracts from a major project currently on site in London for one of the world's largest companies.