The Contract Program and Demonstrating Delay
The term “Contract Program” is often used in reference to the Construction or Contractor’s Program.
The Construction (or Contractor’s) Program is basically the execution plan and timeline of how the works under the Contract will be carried out and measured. It should consider the key sequences of work and resource dependencies. It should also, depending on the Contract, identify the critical path and the relationships between the planned activities and interfaces.
The Construction Program is a vital tool in managing change and demonstrating the impact of a delay event.
Is the program a Contract document?
In short, it depends on the Contract. For example, Australian Standard forms of Contract AS2124 and AS4300 provide that a Construction Program or Contractor’s Program (as in AS4300) may be volunteered, directed or included in the Contract. AS4000 and AS4902 provide that the superintendent may direct the provision of a Construction Program, and the program is defined as a Contract document.
“A construction program is a written statement showing the dates by which, or the times within which, the various stages or portions of WUC are to be carried out or completed. It shall be deemed a Contract document.” AS4000-1997 Clause 32
Is the Contract Program static?
Contractors often hold the view that the “Contract Program” i.e., the Construction Program, accepted at the time of tender is “static”. This is understandable, given the following excerpts from Australian Standard Forms.
“The Contractor must not depart from the Contractor’s Program without the prior written approval of the Principal or the Superintendent."
“The furnishing of a Contractor’s Program or of a further Contractor’s Program shall not relieve the Contractor of any obligations under the Contract including the obligation not to depart, without reasonable cause, from an earlier Contractor’s Program.”
AS4300-1995
“The Contractor shall not, without reasonable cause, depart from a construction program.”
AS4000-1997
领英推荐
As is invariably the case, the Construction Program almost always deviates from the originally planned sequence.
Unfortunately, the Superintendent rarely approves the revised Construction Program. The approved (baseline) Construction Program becomes obsolete because it does not represent the revised plan.
This is why Contractor’s often seek to maintain a Target Program, which better reflects the revised, or “real” plan.
The Target Program may be maintained in parallel with the Contract Program. The premise being that the Target Program betters the Date for Completion by removing built-in contingencies, whilst the Contract Program maintains them.
The common misnomer that a contingency may be considered float is likely the primary reason for this, whilst also reinforcing the Contractors terminal float ownership i.e., is the Contractor entitled to an Extension of Time to the Date of Completion?
What does this mean in terms of demonstrating delay entitlement?
Generally, the Australian Standard Forms of Contract do not provide for how an entitlement to an Extension of Time should be demonstrated.
However, it is generally accepted that the impact of a delay event (to the Date for/of Completion) be demonstrated on the current (approved) Construction Program, which has been updated contemporaneously with progress data at regular intervals prior to the proximate commencement of the delay event.
The analysis should demonstrate the extent to which the delay event (the cause) impacted the critical path to completion (the effect), whilst having regard to the Contractor’s planned intent and progress.
If the Contractor has been adhering to a different program (target, or otherwise), it may encounter difficulty in demonstrating an entitlement to an Extension of Time, given its obligation to follow the approved Construction Program, as in the Australian Standard Forms.
If you enjoyed this LinkedIn Managing Construction Claims newsletter, I would love it if you subscribed for more, let me know your thoughts, or shared with your network.
To learn more about managing claims or how Accura Consulting can help you, head to our website or get in touch.
--
Paul
“The Contractor shall not, without reasonable cause, depart from a construction program.” - AS4000
FCIArb, MICE, MHKIE, CEng, LLB. Adjudicator. Claims Consultant. Delay analyst. Civil Engineer.
9 个月A programme is just a statement of intention, made at a particular point in time based on a particular set of facts and constraints known at that time. To suggest it cannot be changed “without approval” shows a serious misunderstanding of what it is and whose intention it is. If an employer is so hung up on it, they should issue their own programme and dictate the resources and method the contractor use. Oh, but then they would carry the risk of not meeting the programme, so never mind.
Contract & Commercial Manager - Licensed Civil Engineer - Contracts & Claims Specialist
9 个月A Programme is a good management tool and is used to demonstrate progress of works and delays. However, it will be unreliable if it does not show the actual progress of works and if it is not updated on a regular basis. In addition, if not resource loaded then it will not be so accurate. The accuracy of the Programme should always be considered. Having said above, thus, it is so important to support delay analysis with narratives and records. Moreover, demonstrating and proving delays should also include looking facts on reports, documents and examining the Scope of Works and obligations of the parties. Great article Paul McArd ! Thanks.
Senior Contracts Manager II LLM (Const. Law and Arb) ll MBA (RealEstConstMgt) ll BSc(Hons) ll CEng.ll MRICS ll MCIOB ll FCIArb II FICA ll Forensic Delay Expert Witness || Arbitrator (ICA l IIAC) || MMUP-A ll Researcher
9 个月Very helpful! Thank you so much