Context free Questions for testers parsed (c.f. not the crooner)
Nilanjan Bhattacharya
Technical Test Manager/lead for complex software products (cybersecurity, CAD, low code). Created and mentored test teams on par with the best. Public articles show my passion and thinking.
Leaving out the names of the original author to avoid positive bias or angst at seeing repeated mentions.? (The article has a link to the original for anyone interested. That in turn has a link to another source.)
?Context-Free Questions for Testing – DevelopSense is a great blog post on questions to ask about testing at the planning stage.? The author mentions the option of linking the question to HTSM and CM (see original link for the meanings of these acronyms).? I have categorized the questions based on those two models.
For some questions, the relevance of the question wasn’t clear to me.? If you read the original inspiration for the testing blog post, the relevance becomes apparent.? I’ve added an excerpt of the original source at the end of this post.
Questions
Question about questions
Client
Mission
Schedule/Delivery
Product/Project
Team
Skills
Information (Requirements in CM)
Tools (Test Lab in CM)
Data
Feelings
Question about questions?
Questions asked in the original source.?
I’ve removed some of the questions – you can purchase the original to view those.
Exploring requirements
?Here are some context free Project related questions:
1.?????? Who is the client?
2.?????? What is a highly successful solution really worth to this client?
3.?????? What is the real reason for wanting to solve this problem?
4.?????? Should we use a single design team, or more than one?
5.?????? .
领英推荐
6.?????? .
7.?????? .
8.?????? .
Here is a list of useful context-free product questions:
9.?????? What problems does this product solve?
10.?? What problems could this product create?
11.?? .
12.?? .
The following meta-questions have been used with great success:
13.?? Am I asking you too many questions?
14.?? ?Do my questions seem relevant?
15.?? ?.
16.?? .
In order to be sure we understand each other, I've found that it helps me to have things in writing where I can study them at leisure. May I write down your answers and give you a written copy to study and approve? Use this if your communication has been only in writing so far:
17.?? The written material has been helpful, but I find I understand some things better if I can discuss them face-to-face. Can we get together at some point, so we can know each other better and can clarify some of these points?
18.?? Is there anyone else who can give me useful answers?
19.?? .
20.?? .
21.?? .
22.?? .
23.?? .
24.?? ?
Context-free questions often reveal conflicting assumptions among various interested parties. Because you have prepared the questions in advance, you can more easily compare replies, and you should always do so. Then you can ask:
25.?? When I asked X about that, she said Y. Do you have any idea why she might have said Y?
An easy way to compare replies is to interview two or more people at the same time. If they have differences in their assumptions, you may see a clear reaction. Then you can ask the following meta-question:
26.?? I notice that you don't seem to agree with that reply. Would you tell us about that?
When interviewing two or more people together, however, be on the alert for one person's answers inhibiting another's. Such inhibitions are going to haunt you as you proceed through the project, so you may want to take this early opportunity to ask:
27.?? Are you comfortable with the process right now? Is there any reason you don't feel you can answer freely?
Of course, if they don't feel comfortable, they may also not feel comfortable saying they're not comfortable. If you sense the possibility of this situation, try asking the previous questions in private, of each participant. Another group of tough, critical meta-questions cannot always be asked directly:
28.?? What can you tell me about the other people on this project?
29.?? How do you feel about the other people working with us on this project?
30.?? .
31.?? .
If a direct approach is not suitable, handle such questions not by asking them, but by looking for their answers buried in the answers to other questions. When someone mentions another person, make a note of the context and, possibly, ask.
32.?? Can you tell me more about that person?
?
Product Quality | Agile Practitioner | S1000D | SLM | Windchill | Automation | Publishing
2 个月One of the best thing I read today.