Are contemporary antifungal doses sufficient for critically ill patients? Outcomes from an international, multicenter pharmacokinetics study for......
Javier Amador-Casta?eda, BHS, RRT, FCCM
| Respiratory Care Practitioner | Author | Speaker | Veteran | ESICM Representative, North America
Roberts, J.A., Sime, F.B., Lipman, J. et al. Are contemporary antifungal doses sufficient for critically ill patients? Outcomes from an international, multicenter pharmacokinetics study for Screening Antifungal Exposure in Intensive Care Units—the SAFE-ICU study. Intensive Care Med (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-025-07793-5
Summary of "Are Contemporary Antifungal Doses Sufficient for Critically Ill Patients? Outcomes from an International, Multicenter Pharmacokinetics Study for Screening Antifungal Exposure in Intensive Care Units—The SAFE-ICU Study"
Abstract
This study evaluates the adequacy of current antifungal dosing regimens in critically ill patients by analyzing pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target attainment across multiple antifungal agents. Conducted in 30 ICUs across 12 countries, the study found that while prophylactic antifungal use often met PK/PD targets, significant variability and subtherapeutic exposures were observed in treatment settings, particularly with voriconazole, posaconazole, micafungin, and amphotericin B. The findings highlight the need for individualized dosing strategies and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) to optimize antifungal therapy in critically ill patients.
Key Points
Conclusion
The SAFE-ICU study highlights significant variability in antifungal PK/PD target attainment in critically ill patients, demonstrating that contemporary dosing regimens are often inadequate. Improved strategies incorporating TDM, individualized dosing, and pathogen-specific MIC assessment are necessary to optimize antifungal efficacy and reduce mortality in ICU settings.
领英推荐
Watch the following video on "[Webinar] Antibiotic Resistance" by ICU Management & Practice
Discussion Questions
Take Advantage of This Resource
I encourage you to explore this growing library of articles and leverage it to stay informed on the latest in critical care. Visit the collection today at: https://perfusfind.com/ic/
This is another step in making high-quality, evidence-based information easily accessible to the critical care community. As always, thank you for your continued support!
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
Advanced Pharmacist Practitioner ICU & ECMO; Intensive Care Society Pharmacy Professional Advisory Group Member; Labrador UK Action Group volunteer.
2 周Hakeem Yusuff MRCP FRCA FFICM as I understand it we have surprisingly good local sensitivity to azoles still, so for prophylaxis we still use fluconazole. Whereas other areas really struggle. However our ECMO population aren't necessarily local, and we seldom use fluconazole, as we mostly choose to treat until biomarkers are back, rather than prophylact. But when we do use fluconazole in our patient group, we tend to use 400mg BD as they're often filtered too. I can't wait to see our vori data, and the genotyping results, and I'm really interested to see how it compares to Haifa Lyster's work too ?? Not long now!