Consistency drives Employee Engagement & Business Outcomes
Nicolas BEHBAHANI
Global People Analytics & HR Data Leader - People & Culture | Strategical People Analytics Design
?? Engagement is a business outcome itself.
Only 42% of employees have a consistent EX and Engagement is 5.5X higher when EX is aligned to culture and strategy. High-performing organizations add sand and water by looking for ways to ensure the employee experience consistently supports the business goals, and by “personalizing” the work experience to address the needs of different cohorts and groups.?So consistency and personalization is a magical combination.
?? Leaders must act on 3 powerful factors to achieve a more engaging work experience: Connection, Consistency and Courage, according to a new interesting research published by Kincentric Spencer Stuart using data from more than 9 million respondents from over 2,500 organizations, across 162 countries and 62 industries.
?Employee Engagement is plateauing
Kincentric researchers noticed that EX scores consistently falling in the high 60% engaged range over the last six years or so.
In the early 2000s, around 50% of employees surveyed had scores in the “engaged” range. Over time, as more companies have focused on and taken actions to drive engagement, the number has steadily increased1 to the point that we now see scores consistently falling in the high 60% engaged range over the last six years or so.
?A new normal?with Optimism
Researchers found that several aspects of work experience have improved over the last year and global trends reveal that employees have more optimism about their personal future and general work experience than in the previous year. There is also more confidence in the effectiveness of virtual work, both in meeting the needs of customers and being able to collaborate productively with coworkers.?
Researchers look at 4 different aspects of work experience:
? Negative aspects of Employee Experience
Researchers noticed that employees are becoming more demanding regarding what they want from their leadership and work experience.
Perceptions of senior leaders are falling back to pre-pandemic levels in terms of showing care and concern, keeping people informed and creating optimism about the future. In addition, despite being confident about collaborating virtually, fewer feel they are getting the connection and support they need from their work group and only about half feel their ideas and suggestions are being heard.
Researchers also noticed that organizational values are being understood but not being demonstrated. During the pandemic, employees felt heard, considered and cared for in many ways. As we return to a “new normal,” there may be a shift in the expectations that people have of their leaders and in how values are not just expressed, but truly lived in day-to-day work experiences.
?EX needs alignment to strategy and culture to drive business impact
To achieve the largest return on critical business outcomes, leaders must intentionally act on the employee experience to make it consistently great.
Researchers found that every employee experience effort - both measurement and transformation - ultimately should start with business strategy
?? Business strategy should be connected to the culture of your organization as well. Culture defines the values, beliefs, behaviors, artifacts and reward systems that ultimately shape how work gets done. When your culture is not aligned to business strategy, the ability to deliver on the strategy may become blocked by the culture itself. But when culture and strategy are connected and aligned, success in achieving business goals is greatly enhanced.
Researchers found that 3 general factors that may be contributing to this disconnect between business strategy and employee experience:
1?? Over-reliance on managers to drive/own the employee experience:?
2?? Over focus on engagement as a metric, rather than a focus on the experiences that drive engagement
3?? Survey measures as a “feel-good” process rather than a tool to drive change
?? Researchers finally believed that many aspects of these disconnecting factors can be resolved by shifting focus toward consistency of experience and not just the outcome of engagement.
?The Seven Key Core Experience Elements
Researchers identified 7 core elements of employee experience grounded in strategy, culture and maturity:
??Enabling
??Leading
??Recognizing
??Performing
??Developing
领英推荐
??Managing
??Connecting
?? Researchers found that “Enabling” and “Leading” tend to be influenced more by organization-wide or top down initiatives. “Managing” and “Connecting” tend to be more influenced by team actions (e.g., changes in manager behavior, day-to-day enrichment). “Recognizing,” “Performing” and “Developing” are influenced by both organizational and team actions, with organizational actions being more focused on processes and structures related to these elements, and team actions being more focused on enacting on these processes reliably, while also adjusting to local and individual needs.
?Consistent Employee Experience lead to higher Employee Engagement
?Researchers readily found that consistency of experience was related to engagement levels, with those demonstrating low consistency showing the least engagement (r = .44, p <.001). Furthermore, the range of engagement scores was limited by level of consistency. Those with low consistency at best were less than 50% engaged, whereas those with high consistency showed no less than 81% engaged. Moderate consistency shows some possibility of achieving above-average levels of engagement, but most fall within the average range
?Consistency across experience elements has a dramatic impact on engagement levels
Researchers noticed that employees with a highly consistent experience are more than 5X likely to be engaged than those in the inconsistent experience group, and intent to stay was over 2X higher for the highly consistent group than for the inconsistent group.
?Consistency translates to better Business outcomes
Researchers also noticed that over 2X differences between highly consistent and inconsistent groups - with about 65% to 70% of the highly consistent group respondents rating their organization as above average or better on financial performance and customer satisfaction, compared to only about 30% of those in the inconsistent experience group.
Here, too, being in the moderate group doesn’t take performance beyond average performance, you need to have consistency across most of the elements, not just several of them, to get the largest potential payoff.?
?Courage from the C-suite makes employee experience a business asset
Researchers ?have identified 3 critical factors that contribute to a more consistent and connected employee experience:
??Shift the ownership back to top leaders
??Empower managers to amplify through personalization
?? Drive HR with intention and cohesion to deliver more mature, personalized experiences
Researchers found that the more prevalent drivers of engagement often include measures related to senior leadership, but not managers. They believed that this makes sense, as senior leaders set the priorities in their organizations, are the ultimate owners of the processes that people engage with in their work, have oversight of these processes, and are able to determine when changes are made and to what end. Influence and support from both levels of leadership are required, but while managers play an important role in creating an engaging work experience, research shows senior leaders have a stronger level of influence.
?Leadership strength impacts consistency
Researchers found that the strength of leadership influence also has an impact on consistency of experience.
When there is strong leadership influence, consistency improves, especially with high manager support (1.2X compared to low manager support). Conversely, they found the least consistency of experience when senior leadership influence is weak, regardless of whether manager support is high or low.
?? However, high manager support can help to amplify impact in the absence of strong leadership influence, somewhat improving the employee experience.
?Leadership influences on Business performance
Researchers discovered that organizations whose financial performance was rated above average or better, those with both high senior leadership influence and high manager support outperform those with low senior leadership influence and low manager support by over 50%.
The extra manager support helps them bring leader vision and priorities to life in a more consistent way, which in turn can translate into stronger business outcomes.?
?? Researchers suggest leaders to ensure your managers are provided with a consistent experience themselves, which will enable them to amplify and activate the vision and strategy of senior leadership. It is equally important to ensure both your managers and senior leaders have a clear understanding of their authority to make decisions, particularly as it relates to processes and procedures that can shape the employee experience.
?? Researchers conclude that the more favorable work experiences an employee has, the more likely this translates into a higher level of engagement. In other words, the experience is reliable enough for one to feel engaged.
These findings suggest that a highly consistent, great employee experience has the biggest positive impact on business performance. Conversely, less consistency suggests excessive “noise” or inconsistency in the experience, which can often hamper business performance
It is important to note that achieving consistency does not mean that everyone’s specific experience is the same - rather, it means that every experience strives to give people the same effect. Positive perceptions about core EX elements such as Developing, Recognizing, Managing and so forth will come from the experiences that are most relevant to both the individual employee as well as various cohorts within the organization.
Thank you ??? Kincentric Spencer Stuart ?researchers team for these insightful findings:? Jeff Jolton Amy Vinh Seymour Adler David Perna Chiara Miuccio Ashley Hajnos Réka Bakos Katherine Waite Sophie Oberkampff de Dabrun Robin Boesen Dnika Travis Kevin Connelly Anna Kovasna
?? Follow me on?LinkedIn , and click the ?? at the top of my profile page to stay on top of the latest on new best?HR, People Analytics, Human Capital and Future of Work research, become more effective in your HR function and support your business, and join the conversation on my posts.
???Join?7,500+?people and subscribe to receive?Weekly People Research
Everyday, I share a new research article about?People Analytics, Human Capital, HR analytics, Human Resources, Talent,….
Global CPO / Coach / Curator of lists and possibilities
1 年Absolutely! Consistency breeds stability - small steps taken everyday compound over time. Find solace in the steadiness of consistent effort. It allows us to enjoy the growth, learn from challenges, and celebrate every milestone along the way - which we all know is the most important part anyway. ??
Thanks for sharing! Consistency in various aspects of the workplace is indeed a powerful driver of employee engagement, which, in turn, positively impacts business success and creates a more resilient and thriving organization. At LEAD, we navigate and propel employee engagement through team-building initiatives including the power of people analytics and AI to help companies achieve positive business outcomes.
HR Manager at Build-A-Bear Workshop | Expert in Employee Relations Strategies
1 年I think you tagged the wrong person
Founder & CEO @ Lever Talent | Host of The Lever Show | Helping leaders develop talent strategies that leverage a tech-empowered future.
1 年The point on over-reliance on employee engagement is so true, Nicolas. Engagement is a lagging indicator. This is like in sales when the task is to drive revenue. Revenue is the outcome of many other processes, tasks, and initiatives. Engagement is no different. And not all high engagement scores are good engagement scores. If you have an underperformer who's engaged, that's a false positive. Or, if you have a ton of variability in engagement by department, then that is not a sign of poor managers but, more likely poor employee experience strategy and standards set across the company. And back to the sales analogy - the way that most sales teams learn to consistently deliver is not just about hiring the best salespeople in the world. It's about training people to follow a process and teaching them how to use formulas to approach situations. I think the same can be said for employee experience and HR. In my view, HR leaders can learn a lot from their revenue counterparts to determine how to implement processes that drive consistent experiences and set standards company-wide. My two c's. Cheers to consistency!
Thanks Nicolas for the repost - glad it resonated with you. To answer George's question about consistency and change - if the strategy is clear (that is the "why" behind the change) and changes in experience are clearly aligned to that strategy, then people will see the changes as actually helping to bring more consistency of experience. It isn't that consistency is about stability - it is about reliability of what the EX. If change enhances and enriches the promised EX, it will be beneficial. If it seems random or contradictory, then it will become an obstacle. That's why alignment to strategy and leadership ownership is so critical.